Cargando…
A Bayesian mathematical model of motor and cognitive outcomes in Parkinson’s disease
BACKGROUND: There are few established predictors of the clinical course of PD. Prognostic markers would be useful for clinical care and research. OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of long-term motor and cognitive outcomes and rate of progression in PD. METHODS: Newly diagnosed PD participants were f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5467836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28604798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178982 |
_version_ | 1783243325789175808 |
---|---|
author | Hayete, Boris Wuest, Diane Laramie, Jason McDonagh, Paul Church, Bruce Eberly, Shirley Lang, Anthony Marek, Kenneth Runge, Karl Shoulson, Ira Singleton, Andrew Tanner, Caroline Khalil, Iya Verma, Ajay Ravina, Bernard |
author_facet | Hayete, Boris Wuest, Diane Laramie, Jason McDonagh, Paul Church, Bruce Eberly, Shirley Lang, Anthony Marek, Kenneth Runge, Karl Shoulson, Ira Singleton, Andrew Tanner, Caroline Khalil, Iya Verma, Ajay Ravina, Bernard |
author_sort | Hayete, Boris |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are few established predictors of the clinical course of PD. Prognostic markers would be useful for clinical care and research. OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of long-term motor and cognitive outcomes and rate of progression in PD. METHODS: Newly diagnosed PD participants were followed for 7 years in a prospective study, conducted at 55 centers in the United States and Canada. Analyses were conducted in 244 participants with complete demographic, clinical, genetic, and dopamine transporter imaging data. Machine learning dynamic Bayesian graphical models were used to identify and simulate predictors and outcomes. The outcomes rate of cognition changes are assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores, and rate of motor changes are assessed by UPDRS part-III. RESULTS: The most robust and consistent longitudinal predictors of cognitive function included older age, baseline Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) parts I and II, Schwab and England activities of daily living scale, striatal dopamine transporter binding, and SNP rs11724635 in the gene BST1. The most consistent predictor of UPDRS part III was baseline level of activities of daily living (part II). Key findings were replicated using long-term data from an independent cohort study. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline function near the time of Parkinson’s disease diagnosis, as measured by activities of daily living, is a consistent predictor of long-term motor and cognitive outcomes. Additional predictors identified may further characterize the expected course of Parkinson’s disease and suggest mechanisms underlying disease progression. The prognostic model developed in this study can be used to simulate the effects of the prognostic variables on motor and cognitive outcomes, and can be replicated and refined with data from independent longitudinal studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5467836 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54678362017-06-22 A Bayesian mathematical model of motor and cognitive outcomes in Parkinson’s disease Hayete, Boris Wuest, Diane Laramie, Jason McDonagh, Paul Church, Bruce Eberly, Shirley Lang, Anthony Marek, Kenneth Runge, Karl Shoulson, Ira Singleton, Andrew Tanner, Caroline Khalil, Iya Verma, Ajay Ravina, Bernard PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: There are few established predictors of the clinical course of PD. Prognostic markers would be useful for clinical care and research. OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of long-term motor and cognitive outcomes and rate of progression in PD. METHODS: Newly diagnosed PD participants were followed for 7 years in a prospective study, conducted at 55 centers in the United States and Canada. Analyses were conducted in 244 participants with complete demographic, clinical, genetic, and dopamine transporter imaging data. Machine learning dynamic Bayesian graphical models were used to identify and simulate predictors and outcomes. The outcomes rate of cognition changes are assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores, and rate of motor changes are assessed by UPDRS part-III. RESULTS: The most robust and consistent longitudinal predictors of cognitive function included older age, baseline Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) parts I and II, Schwab and England activities of daily living scale, striatal dopamine transporter binding, and SNP rs11724635 in the gene BST1. The most consistent predictor of UPDRS part III was baseline level of activities of daily living (part II). Key findings were replicated using long-term data from an independent cohort study. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline function near the time of Parkinson’s disease diagnosis, as measured by activities of daily living, is a consistent predictor of long-term motor and cognitive outcomes. Additional predictors identified may further characterize the expected course of Parkinson’s disease and suggest mechanisms underlying disease progression. The prognostic model developed in this study can be used to simulate the effects of the prognostic variables on motor and cognitive outcomes, and can be replicated and refined with data from independent longitudinal studies. Public Library of Science 2017-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5467836/ /pubmed/28604798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178982 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hayete, Boris Wuest, Diane Laramie, Jason McDonagh, Paul Church, Bruce Eberly, Shirley Lang, Anthony Marek, Kenneth Runge, Karl Shoulson, Ira Singleton, Andrew Tanner, Caroline Khalil, Iya Verma, Ajay Ravina, Bernard A Bayesian mathematical model of motor and cognitive outcomes in Parkinson’s disease |
title | A Bayesian mathematical model of motor and cognitive outcomes in Parkinson’s disease |
title_full | A Bayesian mathematical model of motor and cognitive outcomes in Parkinson’s disease |
title_fullStr | A Bayesian mathematical model of motor and cognitive outcomes in Parkinson’s disease |
title_full_unstemmed | A Bayesian mathematical model of motor and cognitive outcomes in Parkinson’s disease |
title_short | A Bayesian mathematical model of motor and cognitive outcomes in Parkinson’s disease |
title_sort | bayesian mathematical model of motor and cognitive outcomes in parkinson’s disease |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5467836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28604798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178982 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hayeteboris abayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT wuestdiane abayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT laramiejason abayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT mcdonaghpaul abayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT churchbruce abayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT eberlyshirley abayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT langanthony abayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT marekkenneth abayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT rungekarl abayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT shoulsonira abayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT singletonandrew abayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT tannercaroline abayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT khaliliya abayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT vermaajay abayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT ravinabernard abayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT hayeteboris bayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT wuestdiane bayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT laramiejason bayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT mcdonaghpaul bayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT churchbruce bayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT eberlyshirley bayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT langanthony bayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT marekkenneth bayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT rungekarl bayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT shoulsonira bayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT singletonandrew bayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT tannercaroline bayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT khaliliya bayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT vermaajay bayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT ravinabernard bayesianmathematicalmodelofmotorandcognitiveoutcomesinparkinsonsdisease |