Cargando…
Methods to maximise recovery of environmental DNA from water samples
The environmental DNA (eDNA) method is a detection technique that is rapidly gaining credibility as a sensitive tool useful in the surveillance and monitoring of invasive and threatened species. Because eDNA analysis often deals with small quantities of short and degraded DNA fragments, methods that...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5467897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28604830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179251 |
_version_ | 1783243336830681088 |
---|---|
author | Hinlo, Rheyda Gleeson, Dianne Lintermans, Mark Furlan, Elise |
author_facet | Hinlo, Rheyda Gleeson, Dianne Lintermans, Mark Furlan, Elise |
author_sort | Hinlo, Rheyda |
collection | PubMed |
description | The environmental DNA (eDNA) method is a detection technique that is rapidly gaining credibility as a sensitive tool useful in the surveillance and monitoring of invasive and threatened species. Because eDNA analysis often deals with small quantities of short and degraded DNA fragments, methods that maximize eDNA recovery are required to increase detectability. In this study, we performed experiments at different stages of the eDNA analysis to show which combinations of methods give the best recovery rate for eDNA. Using Oriental weatherloach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus) as a study species, we show that various combinations of DNA capture, preservation and extraction methods can significantly affect DNA yield. Filtration using cellulose nitrate filter paper preserved in ethanol or stored in a -20°C freezer and extracted with the Qiagen DNeasy kit outperformed other combinations in terms of cost and efficiency of DNA recovery. Our results support the recommendation to filter water samples within 24hours but if this is not possible, our results suggest that refrigeration may be a better option than freezing for short-term storage (i.e., 3–5 days). This information is useful in designing eDNA detection of low-density invasive or threatened species, where small variations in DNA recovery can signify the difference between detection success or failure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5467897 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54678972017-06-22 Methods to maximise recovery of environmental DNA from water samples Hinlo, Rheyda Gleeson, Dianne Lintermans, Mark Furlan, Elise PLoS One Research Article The environmental DNA (eDNA) method is a detection technique that is rapidly gaining credibility as a sensitive tool useful in the surveillance and monitoring of invasive and threatened species. Because eDNA analysis often deals with small quantities of short and degraded DNA fragments, methods that maximize eDNA recovery are required to increase detectability. In this study, we performed experiments at different stages of the eDNA analysis to show which combinations of methods give the best recovery rate for eDNA. Using Oriental weatherloach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus) as a study species, we show that various combinations of DNA capture, preservation and extraction methods can significantly affect DNA yield. Filtration using cellulose nitrate filter paper preserved in ethanol or stored in a -20°C freezer and extracted with the Qiagen DNeasy kit outperformed other combinations in terms of cost and efficiency of DNA recovery. Our results support the recommendation to filter water samples within 24hours but if this is not possible, our results suggest that refrigeration may be a better option than freezing for short-term storage (i.e., 3–5 days). This information is useful in designing eDNA detection of low-density invasive or threatened species, where small variations in DNA recovery can signify the difference between detection success or failure. Public Library of Science 2017-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5467897/ /pubmed/28604830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179251 Text en © 2017 Hinlo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hinlo, Rheyda Gleeson, Dianne Lintermans, Mark Furlan, Elise Methods to maximise recovery of environmental DNA from water samples |
title | Methods to maximise recovery of environmental DNA from water samples |
title_full | Methods to maximise recovery of environmental DNA from water samples |
title_fullStr | Methods to maximise recovery of environmental DNA from water samples |
title_full_unstemmed | Methods to maximise recovery of environmental DNA from water samples |
title_short | Methods to maximise recovery of environmental DNA from water samples |
title_sort | methods to maximise recovery of environmental dna from water samples |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5467897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28604830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179251 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hinlorheyda methodstomaximiserecoveryofenvironmentaldnafromwatersamples AT gleesondianne methodstomaximiserecoveryofenvironmentaldnafromwatersamples AT lintermansmark methodstomaximiserecoveryofenvironmentaldnafromwatersamples AT furlanelise methodstomaximiserecoveryofenvironmentaldnafromwatersamples |