Cargando…

Methods to maximise recovery of environmental DNA from water samples

The environmental DNA (eDNA) method is a detection technique that is rapidly gaining credibility as a sensitive tool useful in the surveillance and monitoring of invasive and threatened species. Because eDNA analysis often deals with small quantities of short and degraded DNA fragments, methods that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hinlo, Rheyda, Gleeson, Dianne, Lintermans, Mark, Furlan, Elise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5467897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28604830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179251
_version_ 1783243336830681088
author Hinlo, Rheyda
Gleeson, Dianne
Lintermans, Mark
Furlan, Elise
author_facet Hinlo, Rheyda
Gleeson, Dianne
Lintermans, Mark
Furlan, Elise
author_sort Hinlo, Rheyda
collection PubMed
description The environmental DNA (eDNA) method is a detection technique that is rapidly gaining credibility as a sensitive tool useful in the surveillance and monitoring of invasive and threatened species. Because eDNA analysis often deals with small quantities of short and degraded DNA fragments, methods that maximize eDNA recovery are required to increase detectability. In this study, we performed experiments at different stages of the eDNA analysis to show which combinations of methods give the best recovery rate for eDNA. Using Oriental weatherloach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus) as a study species, we show that various combinations of DNA capture, preservation and extraction methods can significantly affect DNA yield. Filtration using cellulose nitrate filter paper preserved in ethanol or stored in a -20°C freezer and extracted with the Qiagen DNeasy kit outperformed other combinations in terms of cost and efficiency of DNA recovery. Our results support the recommendation to filter water samples within 24hours but if this is not possible, our results suggest that refrigeration may be a better option than freezing for short-term storage (i.e., 3–5 days). This information is useful in designing eDNA detection of low-density invasive or threatened species, where small variations in DNA recovery can signify the difference between detection success or failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5467897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54678972017-06-22 Methods to maximise recovery of environmental DNA from water samples Hinlo, Rheyda Gleeson, Dianne Lintermans, Mark Furlan, Elise PLoS One Research Article The environmental DNA (eDNA) method is a detection technique that is rapidly gaining credibility as a sensitive tool useful in the surveillance and monitoring of invasive and threatened species. Because eDNA analysis often deals with small quantities of short and degraded DNA fragments, methods that maximize eDNA recovery are required to increase detectability. In this study, we performed experiments at different stages of the eDNA analysis to show which combinations of methods give the best recovery rate for eDNA. Using Oriental weatherloach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus) as a study species, we show that various combinations of DNA capture, preservation and extraction methods can significantly affect DNA yield. Filtration using cellulose nitrate filter paper preserved in ethanol or stored in a -20°C freezer and extracted with the Qiagen DNeasy kit outperformed other combinations in terms of cost and efficiency of DNA recovery. Our results support the recommendation to filter water samples within 24hours but if this is not possible, our results suggest that refrigeration may be a better option than freezing for short-term storage (i.e., 3–5 days). This information is useful in designing eDNA detection of low-density invasive or threatened species, where small variations in DNA recovery can signify the difference between detection success or failure. Public Library of Science 2017-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5467897/ /pubmed/28604830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179251 Text en © 2017 Hinlo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hinlo, Rheyda
Gleeson, Dianne
Lintermans, Mark
Furlan, Elise
Methods to maximise recovery of environmental DNA from water samples
title Methods to maximise recovery of environmental DNA from water samples
title_full Methods to maximise recovery of environmental DNA from water samples
title_fullStr Methods to maximise recovery of environmental DNA from water samples
title_full_unstemmed Methods to maximise recovery of environmental DNA from water samples
title_short Methods to maximise recovery of environmental DNA from water samples
title_sort methods to maximise recovery of environmental dna from water samples
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5467897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28604830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179251
work_keys_str_mv AT hinlorheyda methodstomaximiserecoveryofenvironmentaldnafromwatersamples
AT gleesondianne methodstomaximiserecoveryofenvironmentaldnafromwatersamples
AT lintermansmark methodstomaximiserecoveryofenvironmentaldnafromwatersamples
AT furlanelise methodstomaximiserecoveryofenvironmentaldnafromwatersamples