Cargando…

No Additional Benefits of Block- Over Evenly-Distributed High-Intensity Interval Training within a Polarized Microcycle

Introduction: The current study aimed to investigate the responses to block- versus evenly-distributed high-intensity interval training (HIT) within a polarized microcycle. Methods: Twenty well-trained junior cross-country skiers (10 males, age 17.6 ± 1.5 and 10 females, age 17.3 ± 1.5) completed tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGawley, Kerry, Juudas, Elisabeth, Kazior, Zuzanna, Ström, Kristoffer, Blomstrand, Eva, Hansson, Ola, Holmberg, Hans-Christer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5468439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28659826
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00413
_version_ 1783243441637949440
author McGawley, Kerry
Juudas, Elisabeth
Kazior, Zuzanna
Ström, Kristoffer
Blomstrand, Eva
Hansson, Ola
Holmberg, Hans-Christer
author_facet McGawley, Kerry
Juudas, Elisabeth
Kazior, Zuzanna
Ström, Kristoffer
Blomstrand, Eva
Hansson, Ola
Holmberg, Hans-Christer
author_sort McGawley, Kerry
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The current study aimed to investigate the responses to block- versus evenly-distributed high-intensity interval training (HIT) within a polarized microcycle. Methods: Twenty well-trained junior cross-country skiers (10 males, age 17.6 ± 1.5 and 10 females, age 17.3 ± 1.5) completed two, 3-week periods of training (EVEN and BLOCK) in a randomized, crossover-design study. In EVEN, 3 HIT sessions (5 × 4-min of diagonal-stride roller-skiing) were completed at a maximal sustainable intensity each week while low-intensity training (LIT) was distributed evenly around the HIT. In BLOCK, the same 9 HIT sessions were completed in the second week while only LIT was completed in the first and third weeks. Heart rate (HR), session ratings of perceived exertion (sRPE), and perceived recovery (pREC) were recorded for all HIT and LIT sessions, while distance covered was recorded for each HIT interval. The recovery-stress questionnaire for athletes (RESTQ-Sport) was completed weekly. Before and after EVEN and BLOCK, resting saliva and muscle samples were collected and an incremental test and 600-m time-trial (TT) were completed. Results: Pre- to post-testing revealed no significant differences between EVEN and BLOCK for changes in resting salivary cortisol, testosterone, or IgA, or for changes in muscle capillary density, fiber area, fiber composition, enzyme activity (CS, HAD, and PFK) or the protein content of VEGF or PGC-1α. Neither were any differences observed in the changes in skiing economy, [Formula: see text] or 600-m time-trial performance between interventions. These findings were coupled with no significant differences between EVEN and BLOCK for distance covered during HIT, summated HR zone scores, total sRPE training load, overall pREC or overall recovery-stress state. However, 600-m TT performance improved from pre- to post-training, irrespective of intervention (P = 0.003), and a number of hormonal and muscle biopsy markers were also significantly altered post-training (P < 0.05). Discussion: The current study shows that well-trained junior cross-country skiers are able to complete 9 HIT sessions within 1 week without compromising total work done and without experiencing greater stress or reduced recovery over a 3-week polarized microcycle. However, the findings do not support block-distributed HIT as a superior method to a more even distribution of HIT in terms of enhancing physiological or performance adaptions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5468439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54684392017-06-28 No Additional Benefits of Block- Over Evenly-Distributed High-Intensity Interval Training within a Polarized Microcycle McGawley, Kerry Juudas, Elisabeth Kazior, Zuzanna Ström, Kristoffer Blomstrand, Eva Hansson, Ola Holmberg, Hans-Christer Front Physiol Physiology Introduction: The current study aimed to investigate the responses to block- versus evenly-distributed high-intensity interval training (HIT) within a polarized microcycle. Methods: Twenty well-trained junior cross-country skiers (10 males, age 17.6 ± 1.5 and 10 females, age 17.3 ± 1.5) completed two, 3-week periods of training (EVEN and BLOCK) in a randomized, crossover-design study. In EVEN, 3 HIT sessions (5 × 4-min of diagonal-stride roller-skiing) were completed at a maximal sustainable intensity each week while low-intensity training (LIT) was distributed evenly around the HIT. In BLOCK, the same 9 HIT sessions were completed in the second week while only LIT was completed in the first and third weeks. Heart rate (HR), session ratings of perceived exertion (sRPE), and perceived recovery (pREC) were recorded for all HIT and LIT sessions, while distance covered was recorded for each HIT interval. The recovery-stress questionnaire for athletes (RESTQ-Sport) was completed weekly. Before and after EVEN and BLOCK, resting saliva and muscle samples were collected and an incremental test and 600-m time-trial (TT) were completed. Results: Pre- to post-testing revealed no significant differences between EVEN and BLOCK for changes in resting salivary cortisol, testosterone, or IgA, or for changes in muscle capillary density, fiber area, fiber composition, enzyme activity (CS, HAD, and PFK) or the protein content of VEGF or PGC-1α. Neither were any differences observed in the changes in skiing economy, [Formula: see text] or 600-m time-trial performance between interventions. These findings were coupled with no significant differences between EVEN and BLOCK for distance covered during HIT, summated HR zone scores, total sRPE training load, overall pREC or overall recovery-stress state. However, 600-m TT performance improved from pre- to post-training, irrespective of intervention (P = 0.003), and a number of hormonal and muscle biopsy markers were also significantly altered post-training (P < 0.05). Discussion: The current study shows that well-trained junior cross-country skiers are able to complete 9 HIT sessions within 1 week without compromising total work done and without experiencing greater stress or reduced recovery over a 3-week polarized microcycle. However, the findings do not support block-distributed HIT as a superior method to a more even distribution of HIT in terms of enhancing physiological or performance adaptions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5468439/ /pubmed/28659826 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00413 Text en Copyright © 2017 McGawley, Juudas, Kazior, Ström, Blomstrand, Hansson and Holmberg. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
McGawley, Kerry
Juudas, Elisabeth
Kazior, Zuzanna
Ström, Kristoffer
Blomstrand, Eva
Hansson, Ola
Holmberg, Hans-Christer
No Additional Benefits of Block- Over Evenly-Distributed High-Intensity Interval Training within a Polarized Microcycle
title No Additional Benefits of Block- Over Evenly-Distributed High-Intensity Interval Training within a Polarized Microcycle
title_full No Additional Benefits of Block- Over Evenly-Distributed High-Intensity Interval Training within a Polarized Microcycle
title_fullStr No Additional Benefits of Block- Over Evenly-Distributed High-Intensity Interval Training within a Polarized Microcycle
title_full_unstemmed No Additional Benefits of Block- Over Evenly-Distributed High-Intensity Interval Training within a Polarized Microcycle
title_short No Additional Benefits of Block- Over Evenly-Distributed High-Intensity Interval Training within a Polarized Microcycle
title_sort no additional benefits of block- over evenly-distributed high-intensity interval training within a polarized microcycle
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5468439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28659826
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00413
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgawleykerry noadditionalbenefitsofblockoverevenlydistributedhighintensityintervaltrainingwithinapolarizedmicrocycle
AT juudaselisabeth noadditionalbenefitsofblockoverevenlydistributedhighintensityintervaltrainingwithinapolarizedmicrocycle
AT kaziorzuzanna noadditionalbenefitsofblockoverevenlydistributedhighintensityintervaltrainingwithinapolarizedmicrocycle
AT stromkristoffer noadditionalbenefitsofblockoverevenlydistributedhighintensityintervaltrainingwithinapolarizedmicrocycle
AT blomstrandeva noadditionalbenefitsofblockoverevenlydistributedhighintensityintervaltrainingwithinapolarizedmicrocycle
AT hanssonola noadditionalbenefitsofblockoverevenlydistributedhighintensityintervaltrainingwithinapolarizedmicrocycle
AT holmberghanschrister noadditionalbenefitsofblockoverevenlydistributedhighintensityintervaltrainingwithinapolarizedmicrocycle