Cargando…

Evaluation of an in vitro fibre fermentation method using feline faecal inocula: repeatability and reproducibility

To gain knowledge on the precision of an in vitro method for characterisation of the fermentability of dietary fibres, this study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of such a method. Substrates used were citrus pectin (CP), fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS), guar gum (GG), sugar bee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bosch, Guido, Heesen, Lisa, de Melo Santos, Karine, Pellikaan, Wilbert F., Cone, John W., Hendriks, Wouter H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5468747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28630702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2017.22
_version_ 1783243474613567488
author Bosch, Guido
Heesen, Lisa
de Melo Santos, Karine
Pellikaan, Wilbert F.
Cone, John W.
Hendriks, Wouter H.
author_facet Bosch, Guido
Heesen, Lisa
de Melo Santos, Karine
Pellikaan, Wilbert F.
Cone, John W.
Hendriks, Wouter H.
author_sort Bosch, Guido
collection PubMed
description To gain knowledge on the precision of an in vitro method for characterisation of the fermentability of dietary fibres, this study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of such a method. Substrates used were citrus pectin (CP), fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS), guar gum (GG), sugar beet pulp (SBP) and wheat middlings (WM). Each substrate was incubated with faecal inoculum from five cats with three replicates for each substrate–cat combination. Gas production was measured continuously during the 48 h incubation and SCFA and organic matter disappearance (only SBP and WM) were determined after incubation. Four consecutive runs were performed. The within-run variability (repeatability) was generally lower for the more simple and pure substrates (CP, FOS, GG) than for the more complex substrates containing mixtures of fibres (SBP, WM). Replicates showed high variability, in particular for SCFA profiles and parameters of gas production kinetics. The between-run CV (reproducibility) for the measured parameters were, in general, below 10 % for CP, FOS and GG and higher values were obtained for SBP and WM. It is concluded that for precise dietary fibre characterisation, the number of replicates should be multiple and adjusted according to the variability of the parameters of interest and the complexity of fibres. The method yielded reproducible results with some variation in absolute values obtained, which may have an impact on the significance level of the differences among substrates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5468747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54687472017-06-19 Evaluation of an in vitro fibre fermentation method using feline faecal inocula: repeatability and reproducibility Bosch, Guido Heesen, Lisa de Melo Santos, Karine Pellikaan, Wilbert F. Cone, John W. Hendriks, Wouter H. J Nutr Sci Research Article To gain knowledge on the precision of an in vitro method for characterisation of the fermentability of dietary fibres, this study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of such a method. Substrates used were citrus pectin (CP), fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS), guar gum (GG), sugar beet pulp (SBP) and wheat middlings (WM). Each substrate was incubated with faecal inoculum from five cats with three replicates for each substrate–cat combination. Gas production was measured continuously during the 48 h incubation and SCFA and organic matter disappearance (only SBP and WM) were determined after incubation. Four consecutive runs were performed. The within-run variability (repeatability) was generally lower for the more simple and pure substrates (CP, FOS, GG) than for the more complex substrates containing mixtures of fibres (SBP, WM). Replicates showed high variability, in particular for SCFA profiles and parameters of gas production kinetics. The between-run CV (reproducibility) for the measured parameters were, in general, below 10 % for CP, FOS and GG and higher values were obtained for SBP and WM. It is concluded that for precise dietary fibre characterisation, the number of replicates should be multiple and adjusted according to the variability of the parameters of interest and the complexity of fibres. The method yielded reproducible results with some variation in absolute values obtained, which may have an impact on the significance level of the differences among substrates. Cambridge University Press 2017-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5468747/ /pubmed/28630702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2017.22 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bosch, Guido
Heesen, Lisa
de Melo Santos, Karine
Pellikaan, Wilbert F.
Cone, John W.
Hendriks, Wouter H.
Evaluation of an in vitro fibre fermentation method using feline faecal inocula: repeatability and reproducibility
title Evaluation of an in vitro fibre fermentation method using feline faecal inocula: repeatability and reproducibility
title_full Evaluation of an in vitro fibre fermentation method using feline faecal inocula: repeatability and reproducibility
title_fullStr Evaluation of an in vitro fibre fermentation method using feline faecal inocula: repeatability and reproducibility
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of an in vitro fibre fermentation method using feline faecal inocula: repeatability and reproducibility
title_short Evaluation of an in vitro fibre fermentation method using feline faecal inocula: repeatability and reproducibility
title_sort evaluation of an in vitro fibre fermentation method using feline faecal inocula: repeatability and reproducibility
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5468747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28630702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2017.22
work_keys_str_mv AT boschguido evaluationofaninvitrofibrefermentationmethodusingfelinefaecalinocularepeatabilityandreproducibility
AT heesenlisa evaluationofaninvitrofibrefermentationmethodusingfelinefaecalinocularepeatabilityandreproducibility
AT demelosantoskarine evaluationofaninvitrofibrefermentationmethodusingfelinefaecalinocularepeatabilityandreproducibility
AT pellikaanwilbertf evaluationofaninvitrofibrefermentationmethodusingfelinefaecalinocularepeatabilityandreproducibility
AT conejohnw evaluationofaninvitrofibrefermentationmethodusingfelinefaecalinocularepeatabilityandreproducibility
AT hendrikswouterh evaluationofaninvitrofibrefermentationmethodusingfelinefaecalinocularepeatabilityandreproducibility