Cargando…

Electrophysiological Correlates of Cue-Related Processing in a Gambling Task: Early Outcome Evaluation or Outcome Expectation?

Several recent studies have suggested that cues that predict outcomes elicit a feedback-related-like negativity (FRN-like negativity) reflecting initial appraisals of whether desired outcomes are probable. Some other studies, however, have found that the cues that predict outcomes elicited event-rel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xiaoyi, Lin, Xiaohong, Takagi, Shiho, Sai, Liyang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5468781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28659847
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00978
_version_ 1783243482068942848
author Zhang, Xiaoyi
Lin, Xiaohong
Takagi, Shiho
Sai, Liyang
author_facet Zhang, Xiaoyi
Lin, Xiaohong
Takagi, Shiho
Sai, Liyang
author_sort Zhang, Xiaoyi
collection PubMed
description Several recent studies have suggested that cues that predict outcomes elicit a feedback-related-like negativity (FRN-like negativity) reflecting initial appraisals of whether desired outcomes are probable. Some other studies, however, have found that the cues that predict outcomes elicited event-related potentials (ERPs) that reflect the expectation to outcomes (e.g., outcome expectations). Given these mixed findings, this study aimed to examine whether the brain activity elicited by predictive cues in a gambling task reflected the initial evaluations of the outcomes, the outcome expectations, or both. We used a gambling task in which the participants were told to guess which of two doors hid a reward. At the beginning of each trial, a cue was presented to inform the participants of how many doors hid a reward. We found that these predictive cues elicited a FRN-like negativity at the frontal sites within around 200–300 ms. However, this negativity did not significantly differ between the cues that fully predicted gains and the cues that fully predicted losses. Furthermore, predictive cues elicited an expectation-related slow wave, and cues that predicted gains with a 50% probability elicited a larger expectation-related slow wave than cues that fully predicted gains or losses. Our results suggest that cues predicting outcomes reflect outcome expectations rather than initial evaluations of the forthcoming outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5468781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54687812017-06-28 Electrophysiological Correlates of Cue-Related Processing in a Gambling Task: Early Outcome Evaluation or Outcome Expectation? Zhang, Xiaoyi Lin, Xiaohong Takagi, Shiho Sai, Liyang Front Psychol Psychology Several recent studies have suggested that cues that predict outcomes elicit a feedback-related-like negativity (FRN-like negativity) reflecting initial appraisals of whether desired outcomes are probable. Some other studies, however, have found that the cues that predict outcomes elicited event-related potentials (ERPs) that reflect the expectation to outcomes (e.g., outcome expectations). Given these mixed findings, this study aimed to examine whether the brain activity elicited by predictive cues in a gambling task reflected the initial evaluations of the outcomes, the outcome expectations, or both. We used a gambling task in which the participants were told to guess which of two doors hid a reward. At the beginning of each trial, a cue was presented to inform the participants of how many doors hid a reward. We found that these predictive cues elicited a FRN-like negativity at the frontal sites within around 200–300 ms. However, this negativity did not significantly differ between the cues that fully predicted gains and the cues that fully predicted losses. Furthermore, predictive cues elicited an expectation-related slow wave, and cues that predicted gains with a 50% probability elicited a larger expectation-related slow wave than cues that fully predicted gains or losses. Our results suggest that cues predicting outcomes reflect outcome expectations rather than initial evaluations of the forthcoming outcomes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5468781/ /pubmed/28659847 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00978 Text en Copyright © 2017 Zhang, Lin, Takagi and Sai. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Zhang, Xiaoyi
Lin, Xiaohong
Takagi, Shiho
Sai, Liyang
Electrophysiological Correlates of Cue-Related Processing in a Gambling Task: Early Outcome Evaluation or Outcome Expectation?
title Electrophysiological Correlates of Cue-Related Processing in a Gambling Task: Early Outcome Evaluation or Outcome Expectation?
title_full Electrophysiological Correlates of Cue-Related Processing in a Gambling Task: Early Outcome Evaluation or Outcome Expectation?
title_fullStr Electrophysiological Correlates of Cue-Related Processing in a Gambling Task: Early Outcome Evaluation or Outcome Expectation?
title_full_unstemmed Electrophysiological Correlates of Cue-Related Processing in a Gambling Task: Early Outcome Evaluation or Outcome Expectation?
title_short Electrophysiological Correlates of Cue-Related Processing in a Gambling Task: Early Outcome Evaluation or Outcome Expectation?
title_sort electrophysiological correlates of cue-related processing in a gambling task: early outcome evaluation or outcome expectation?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5468781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28659847
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00978
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxiaoyi electrophysiologicalcorrelatesofcuerelatedprocessinginagamblingtaskearlyoutcomeevaluationoroutcomeexpectation
AT linxiaohong electrophysiologicalcorrelatesofcuerelatedprocessinginagamblingtaskearlyoutcomeevaluationoroutcomeexpectation
AT takagishiho electrophysiologicalcorrelatesofcuerelatedprocessinginagamblingtaskearlyoutcomeevaluationoroutcomeexpectation
AT sailiyang electrophysiologicalcorrelatesofcuerelatedprocessinginagamblingtaskearlyoutcomeevaluationoroutcomeexpectation