Cargando…

Exploring shared risks through public-private partnerships in public health programs: a mixed method

BACKGROUND: The natural assimilation of the process through which health partners sustain long-term relationships is a key issue in maintaining social well-being, reducing health risk factors, and sustaining public health programs. One global initiative in building effective healthcare systems is pu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Alonazi, Wadi B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5468941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28606138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4489-z
_version_ 1783243487719718912
author Alonazi, Wadi B.
author_facet Alonazi, Wadi B.
author_sort Alonazi, Wadi B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The natural assimilation of the process through which health partners sustain long-term relationships is a key issue in maintaining social well-being, reducing health risk factors, and sustaining public health programs. One global initiative in building effective healthcare systems is public-private partnerships (PPPs). This study elucidates the proposed key performance indicators initiated by the Ministry of Health of Saudi Arabia based on the projections of the government, known as Vision 2030, from the perspective of health risk factors. METHODS: Through an inductive content analysis, this study assessed primary and secondary data in relation to the Saudi National Transformation Program (NTP). To identify the institutions that played a role in formulating the new Saudi Healthcare System, health policies, regulations, and reports published between 1996 and 2016 were categorized. After ranking the risk factors, the investigator selected 13 healthcare professionals in four focus group interviews to insightfully explore the challenges that the NTP faces from a health risk perspective. Thus, the study employed qualitative data gathered through focus group interviews with key figures as well as data extracted from written sources to identify distinct but interrelated partnerships practiced within risk management. RESULTS: A methodological overview of NTP priority and implementation offered practical guidance in the healthcare context. The five critical factors in maintaining successful and sustainable PPPs were (1) trustworthiness, (2) technological capability, (3) patient-centeredness, (4) competence, and (5) flexibility. Concession on primary and secondary healthcare services might be a good option based on the literature review and considering its popularity in other countries. A high outcome-based risk of PPPs was found as the most commonly shared perspective in risk management. CONCLUSIONS: Although the impact of the NTP rise has yet to be explored, its potential for challenging health consequences requires consideration and substantial regulatory action. This study contributes to the emerging critical analysis on local health initiatives by highlighting how integration may only be possible with a more radical conceptualization of national health governance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5468941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54689412017-06-14 Exploring shared risks through public-private partnerships in public health programs: a mixed method Alonazi, Wadi B. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The natural assimilation of the process through which health partners sustain long-term relationships is a key issue in maintaining social well-being, reducing health risk factors, and sustaining public health programs. One global initiative in building effective healthcare systems is public-private partnerships (PPPs). This study elucidates the proposed key performance indicators initiated by the Ministry of Health of Saudi Arabia based on the projections of the government, known as Vision 2030, from the perspective of health risk factors. METHODS: Through an inductive content analysis, this study assessed primary and secondary data in relation to the Saudi National Transformation Program (NTP). To identify the institutions that played a role in formulating the new Saudi Healthcare System, health policies, regulations, and reports published between 1996 and 2016 were categorized. After ranking the risk factors, the investigator selected 13 healthcare professionals in four focus group interviews to insightfully explore the challenges that the NTP faces from a health risk perspective. Thus, the study employed qualitative data gathered through focus group interviews with key figures as well as data extracted from written sources to identify distinct but interrelated partnerships practiced within risk management. RESULTS: A methodological overview of NTP priority and implementation offered practical guidance in the healthcare context. The five critical factors in maintaining successful and sustainable PPPs were (1) trustworthiness, (2) technological capability, (3) patient-centeredness, (4) competence, and (5) flexibility. Concession on primary and secondary healthcare services might be a good option based on the literature review and considering its popularity in other countries. A high outcome-based risk of PPPs was found as the most commonly shared perspective in risk management. CONCLUSIONS: Although the impact of the NTP rise has yet to be explored, its potential for challenging health consequences requires consideration and substantial regulatory action. This study contributes to the emerging critical analysis on local health initiatives by highlighting how integration may only be possible with a more radical conceptualization of national health governance. BioMed Central 2017-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5468941/ /pubmed/28606138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4489-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Alonazi, Wadi B.
Exploring shared risks through public-private partnerships in public health programs: a mixed method
title Exploring shared risks through public-private partnerships in public health programs: a mixed method
title_full Exploring shared risks through public-private partnerships in public health programs: a mixed method
title_fullStr Exploring shared risks through public-private partnerships in public health programs: a mixed method
title_full_unstemmed Exploring shared risks through public-private partnerships in public health programs: a mixed method
title_short Exploring shared risks through public-private partnerships in public health programs: a mixed method
title_sort exploring shared risks through public-private partnerships in public health programs: a mixed method
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5468941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28606138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4489-z
work_keys_str_mv AT alonaziwadib exploringsharedrisksthroughpublicprivatepartnershipsinpublichealthprogramsamixedmethod