Cargando…

Differences in utilization of Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) within human services (HHS) regions and metropolitan megaregions in the U.S.

BACKGROUND: Anecdotal evidence suggests that US practice patterns for ART differ by geographical region. The purpose of this study was to determine whether use of ICSI differs by region and to evaluate whether these rates are correlated with differences in live birth rates. METHODS: Public data for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zagadailov, Pavel, Hsu, Albert, Seifer, David B., Stern, Judy E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5469007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28606175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-017-0263-4
_version_ 1783243501478084608
author Zagadailov, Pavel
Hsu, Albert
Seifer, David B.
Stern, Judy E.
author_facet Zagadailov, Pavel
Hsu, Albert
Seifer, David B.
Stern, Judy E.
author_sort Zagadailov, Pavel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anecdotal evidence suggests that US practice patterns for ART differ by geographical region. The purpose of this study was to determine whether use of ICSI differs by region and to evaluate whether these rates are correlated with differences in live birth rates. METHODS: Public data for 2012 were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clinics with ≥100 fresh, non-donor cycles were grouped by 10 nationally recognized Department of Health & Human Services regions and 11 metropolitan Megaregions and were compared for use of ICSI, frequency of male factor infertility, and live birth rate in women <35 years. RESULTS: There were 274 clinics in the Health & Human Services regions and 247 in the Megaregions. ICSI utilization rates in Health & Human Services groups ranged between 52.5–78.2% (P < 0.0001). Live birth rates per cycle in women <35 years differed (34.1–47.6%; P < 0.0001) but did not correlate with rates of ICSI (R(2) = 0.2096; P = 0.18) per cycle. For Megaregions, rates of ICSI per cycle differed (63.4%–93.5%, P < 0.0001) as did live birth rates per cycle for women <35 (36.0%–59.0%, P = 0.001) but there was only minimal correlation between them (R(2) = 0.5347; P = 0.01). Highest rates of ICSI occurred in Front Range (93.5%) and Gulf Coast (83.1%) Megaregions. Lowest rates occurred in the Northeast (63.4%) and Florida (64.8%) Megaregions. Male factor infertility rates did not differ across regions. CONCLUSIONS: ICSI utilization and live birth rates per cycle for each clinic group were significantly different across geographical regions of the U.S. However, higher ICSI utilization rate was not associated with higher rates of male factor infertility nor were they strongly correlated with higher live birth rates per cycle. Studies are needed to understand factors that may influence ICSI overutilization in the U.S.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5469007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54690072017-06-14 Differences in utilization of Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) within human services (HHS) regions and metropolitan megaregions in the U.S. Zagadailov, Pavel Hsu, Albert Seifer, David B. Stern, Judy E. Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Anecdotal evidence suggests that US practice patterns for ART differ by geographical region. The purpose of this study was to determine whether use of ICSI differs by region and to evaluate whether these rates are correlated with differences in live birth rates. METHODS: Public data for 2012 were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clinics with ≥100 fresh, non-donor cycles were grouped by 10 nationally recognized Department of Health & Human Services regions and 11 metropolitan Megaregions and were compared for use of ICSI, frequency of male factor infertility, and live birth rate in women <35 years. RESULTS: There were 274 clinics in the Health & Human Services regions and 247 in the Megaregions. ICSI utilization rates in Health & Human Services groups ranged between 52.5–78.2% (P < 0.0001). Live birth rates per cycle in women <35 years differed (34.1–47.6%; P < 0.0001) but did not correlate with rates of ICSI (R(2) = 0.2096; P = 0.18) per cycle. For Megaregions, rates of ICSI per cycle differed (63.4%–93.5%, P < 0.0001) as did live birth rates per cycle for women <35 (36.0%–59.0%, P = 0.001) but there was only minimal correlation between them (R(2) = 0.5347; P = 0.01). Highest rates of ICSI occurred in Front Range (93.5%) and Gulf Coast (83.1%) Megaregions. Lowest rates occurred in the Northeast (63.4%) and Florida (64.8%) Megaregions. Male factor infertility rates did not differ across regions. CONCLUSIONS: ICSI utilization and live birth rates per cycle for each clinic group were significantly different across geographical regions of the U.S. However, higher ICSI utilization rate was not associated with higher rates of male factor infertility nor were they strongly correlated with higher live birth rates per cycle. Studies are needed to understand factors that may influence ICSI overutilization in the U.S. BioMed Central 2017-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5469007/ /pubmed/28606175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-017-0263-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Zagadailov, Pavel
Hsu, Albert
Seifer, David B.
Stern, Judy E.
Differences in utilization of Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) within human services (HHS) regions and metropolitan megaregions in the U.S.
title Differences in utilization of Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) within human services (HHS) regions and metropolitan megaregions in the U.S.
title_full Differences in utilization of Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) within human services (HHS) regions and metropolitan megaregions in the U.S.
title_fullStr Differences in utilization of Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) within human services (HHS) regions and metropolitan megaregions in the U.S.
title_full_unstemmed Differences in utilization of Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) within human services (HHS) regions and metropolitan megaregions in the U.S.
title_short Differences in utilization of Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) within human services (HHS) regions and metropolitan megaregions in the U.S.
title_sort differences in utilization of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (icsi) within human services (hhs) regions and metropolitan megaregions in the u.s.
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5469007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28606175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-017-0263-4
work_keys_str_mv AT zagadailovpavel differencesinutilizationofintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiwithinhumanserviceshhsregionsandmetropolitanmegaregionsintheus
AT hsualbert differencesinutilizationofintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiwithinhumanserviceshhsregionsandmetropolitanmegaregionsintheus
AT seiferdavidb differencesinutilizationofintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiwithinhumanserviceshhsregionsandmetropolitanmegaregionsintheus
AT sternjudye differencesinutilizationofintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiwithinhumanserviceshhsregionsandmetropolitanmegaregionsintheus