Cargando…

Choosing the target difference (‘effect size’) for a randomised controlled trial - DELTA(2) guidance protocol

BACKGROUND: A key step in the design of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) is the estimation of the number of participants needed. By far the most common approach is to specify a target difference and then estimate the corresponding sample size; this sample size is chosen to provide reassurance tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cook, Jonathan A., Julious, Steven A., Sones, William, Rothwell, Joanne C., Ramsay, Craig R., Hampson, Lisa V., Emsley, Richard, Walters, Stephen J., Hewitt, Catherine, Bland, Martin, Fergusson, Dean A., Berlin, Jesse A., Altman, Doug, Vale, Luke D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5469157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28606102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1969-5
_version_ 1783243535797977088
author Cook, Jonathan A.
Julious, Steven A.
Sones, William
Rothwell, Joanne C.
Ramsay, Craig R.
Hampson, Lisa V.
Emsley, Richard
Walters, Stephen J.
Hewitt, Catherine
Bland, Martin
Fergusson, Dean A.
Berlin, Jesse A.
Altman, Doug
Vale, Luke D.
author_facet Cook, Jonathan A.
Julious, Steven A.
Sones, William
Rothwell, Joanne C.
Ramsay, Craig R.
Hampson, Lisa V.
Emsley, Richard
Walters, Stephen J.
Hewitt, Catherine
Bland, Martin
Fergusson, Dean A.
Berlin, Jesse A.
Altman, Doug
Vale, Luke D.
author_sort Cook, Jonathan A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A key step in the design of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) is the estimation of the number of participants needed. By far the most common approach is to specify a target difference and then estimate the corresponding sample size; this sample size is chosen to provide reassurance that the trial will have high statistical power to detect such a difference between the randomised groups (at the planned statistical significance level). The sample size has many implications for the conduct of the study, as well as carrying scientific and ethical aspects to its choice. Despite the critical role of the target difference for the primary outcome in the design of an RCT, the manner in which it is determined has received little attention. This article reports the protocol of the Difference ELicitation in TriAls (DELTA(2)) project, which will produce guidance on the specification and reporting of the target difference for the primary outcome in a sample size calculation for RCTs. METHODS/DESIGN: The DELTA(2) project has five components: systematic literature reviews of recent methodological developments (stage 1) and existing funder guidance (stage 2); a Delphi study (stage 3); a 2-day consensus meeting bringing together researchers, funders and patient representatives, as well as one-off engagement sessions at relevant stakeholder meetings (stage 4); and the preparation and dissemination of a guidance document (stage 5). DISCUSSION: Specification of the target difference for the primary outcome is a key component of the design of an RCT. There is a need for better guidance for researchers and funders regarding specification and reporting of this aspect of trial design. The aim of this project is to produce consensus based guidance for researchers and funders. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1969-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5469157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54691572017-06-14 Choosing the target difference (‘effect size’) for a randomised controlled trial - DELTA(2) guidance protocol Cook, Jonathan A. Julious, Steven A. Sones, William Rothwell, Joanne C. Ramsay, Craig R. Hampson, Lisa V. Emsley, Richard Walters, Stephen J. Hewitt, Catherine Bland, Martin Fergusson, Dean A. Berlin, Jesse A. Altman, Doug Vale, Luke D. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: A key step in the design of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) is the estimation of the number of participants needed. By far the most common approach is to specify a target difference and then estimate the corresponding sample size; this sample size is chosen to provide reassurance that the trial will have high statistical power to detect such a difference between the randomised groups (at the planned statistical significance level). The sample size has many implications for the conduct of the study, as well as carrying scientific and ethical aspects to its choice. Despite the critical role of the target difference for the primary outcome in the design of an RCT, the manner in which it is determined has received little attention. This article reports the protocol of the Difference ELicitation in TriAls (DELTA(2)) project, which will produce guidance on the specification and reporting of the target difference for the primary outcome in a sample size calculation for RCTs. METHODS/DESIGN: The DELTA(2) project has five components: systematic literature reviews of recent methodological developments (stage 1) and existing funder guidance (stage 2); a Delphi study (stage 3); a 2-day consensus meeting bringing together researchers, funders and patient representatives, as well as one-off engagement sessions at relevant stakeholder meetings (stage 4); and the preparation and dissemination of a guidance document (stage 5). DISCUSSION: Specification of the target difference for the primary outcome is a key component of the design of an RCT. There is a need for better guidance for researchers and funders regarding specification and reporting of this aspect of trial design. The aim of this project is to produce consensus based guidance for researchers and funders. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1969-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5469157/ /pubmed/28606102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1969-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Cook, Jonathan A.
Julious, Steven A.
Sones, William
Rothwell, Joanne C.
Ramsay, Craig R.
Hampson, Lisa V.
Emsley, Richard
Walters, Stephen J.
Hewitt, Catherine
Bland, Martin
Fergusson, Dean A.
Berlin, Jesse A.
Altman, Doug
Vale, Luke D.
Choosing the target difference (‘effect size’) for a randomised controlled trial - DELTA(2) guidance protocol
title Choosing the target difference (‘effect size’) for a randomised controlled trial - DELTA(2) guidance protocol
title_full Choosing the target difference (‘effect size’) for a randomised controlled trial - DELTA(2) guidance protocol
title_fullStr Choosing the target difference (‘effect size’) for a randomised controlled trial - DELTA(2) guidance protocol
title_full_unstemmed Choosing the target difference (‘effect size’) for a randomised controlled trial - DELTA(2) guidance protocol
title_short Choosing the target difference (‘effect size’) for a randomised controlled trial - DELTA(2) guidance protocol
title_sort choosing the target difference (‘effect size’) for a randomised controlled trial - delta(2) guidance protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5469157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28606102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1969-5
work_keys_str_mv AT cookjonathana choosingthetargetdifferenceeffectsizeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdelta2guidanceprotocol
AT juliousstevena choosingthetargetdifferenceeffectsizeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdelta2guidanceprotocol
AT soneswilliam choosingthetargetdifferenceeffectsizeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdelta2guidanceprotocol
AT rothwelljoannec choosingthetargetdifferenceeffectsizeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdelta2guidanceprotocol
AT ramsaycraigr choosingthetargetdifferenceeffectsizeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdelta2guidanceprotocol
AT hampsonlisav choosingthetargetdifferenceeffectsizeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdelta2guidanceprotocol
AT emsleyrichard choosingthetargetdifferenceeffectsizeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdelta2guidanceprotocol
AT waltersstephenj choosingthetargetdifferenceeffectsizeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdelta2guidanceprotocol
AT hewittcatherine choosingthetargetdifferenceeffectsizeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdelta2guidanceprotocol
AT blandmartin choosingthetargetdifferenceeffectsizeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdelta2guidanceprotocol
AT fergussondeana choosingthetargetdifferenceeffectsizeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdelta2guidanceprotocol
AT berlinjessea choosingthetargetdifferenceeffectsizeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdelta2guidanceprotocol
AT altmandoug choosingthetargetdifferenceeffectsizeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdelta2guidanceprotocol
AT valeluked choosingthetargetdifferenceeffectsizeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialdelta2guidanceprotocol