Cargando…
Prognostic factors and outcome of Liposarcoma patients: a retrospective evaluation over 15 years
BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas are rare entities with over 50 histological subtypes. Liposarcoma (LS) is the most common neoplasm in this group; it is a complex neoplasm that is divided into different histological subtypes. Different therapy options, such as surgical resection, radiation, and chem...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5469180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28606068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3398-y |
_version_ | 1783243541463433216 |
---|---|
author | Knebel, Carolin Lenze, Ulrich Pohlig, Florian Lenze, Florian Harrasser, Norbert Suren, Christian Breitenbach, Jonathan Rechl, Hans von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger Mühlhofer, Heinrich M. L. |
author_facet | Knebel, Carolin Lenze, Ulrich Pohlig, Florian Lenze, Florian Harrasser, Norbert Suren, Christian Breitenbach, Jonathan Rechl, Hans von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger Mühlhofer, Heinrich M. L. |
author_sort | Knebel, Carolin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas are rare entities with over 50 histological subtypes. Liposarcoma (LS) is the most common neoplasm in this group; it is a complex neoplasm that is divided into different histological subtypes. Different therapy options, such as surgical resection, radiation, and chemotherapy, are available. Depending on the subtype, location, status of the resection margins and metastatic status, different therapy options are used. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the prognostic factors influencing the survival of patients affected by LS with consideration for the grading, histological subtype, state of the resection margin, size, location, metastases and local recurrence in a retrospective, single-centre analysis over 15 years. METHODS: We included 133 patients (male/female = 67/66) in this study. We recorded the histologic subtype, grade, TNM classification, localization, biopsy technique, tumour margins, number of operations, complications, radiation and dose, chemotherapy, survival, recrudescence, metastases and follow-up. Survivorship analysis was performed. RESULTS: We detected 56 (43%; 95%-CI 34.6–51.6%) atypical LS cases, 21 (16.2%; 95%-CI 9.8–22.5) dedifferentiated LS cases, 40 (30.8%; 95%-CI 22.8–38.7) myxoid LS cases and 12 (9.2%; 95%-CI 4.3–14.2) pleomorphic LS cases. G1 was the most common grade, which was followed by G3. Negative margins (R0) were detected in 67 cases (53.6%; 95%-CI 44.9–62.3) after surgical resection. Local recurrence was detected in 23.6% of cases. The presence of metastases and dedifferentiated LS subtype as well as negative margins, grade and tumour size are significant prognostic factors of the survival rates (p < 0.015). CONCLUSION: Grading, LS subtype, negative margins after surgery, metastases and tumour size are independently associated with disease-specific survival, and patients with local recurrence had lower survival rates. We hope our investigation may facilitate a further prospective study and clinical decision-making in LS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5469180 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54691802017-06-14 Prognostic factors and outcome of Liposarcoma patients: a retrospective evaluation over 15 years Knebel, Carolin Lenze, Ulrich Pohlig, Florian Lenze, Florian Harrasser, Norbert Suren, Christian Breitenbach, Jonathan Rechl, Hans von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger Mühlhofer, Heinrich M. L. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas are rare entities with over 50 histological subtypes. Liposarcoma (LS) is the most common neoplasm in this group; it is a complex neoplasm that is divided into different histological subtypes. Different therapy options, such as surgical resection, radiation, and chemotherapy, are available. Depending on the subtype, location, status of the resection margins and metastatic status, different therapy options are used. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the prognostic factors influencing the survival of patients affected by LS with consideration for the grading, histological subtype, state of the resection margin, size, location, metastases and local recurrence in a retrospective, single-centre analysis over 15 years. METHODS: We included 133 patients (male/female = 67/66) in this study. We recorded the histologic subtype, grade, TNM classification, localization, biopsy technique, tumour margins, number of operations, complications, radiation and dose, chemotherapy, survival, recrudescence, metastases and follow-up. Survivorship analysis was performed. RESULTS: We detected 56 (43%; 95%-CI 34.6–51.6%) atypical LS cases, 21 (16.2%; 95%-CI 9.8–22.5) dedifferentiated LS cases, 40 (30.8%; 95%-CI 22.8–38.7) myxoid LS cases and 12 (9.2%; 95%-CI 4.3–14.2) pleomorphic LS cases. G1 was the most common grade, which was followed by G3. Negative margins (R0) were detected in 67 cases (53.6%; 95%-CI 44.9–62.3) after surgical resection. Local recurrence was detected in 23.6% of cases. The presence of metastases and dedifferentiated LS subtype as well as negative margins, grade and tumour size are significant prognostic factors of the survival rates (p < 0.015). CONCLUSION: Grading, LS subtype, negative margins after surgery, metastases and tumour size are independently associated with disease-specific survival, and patients with local recurrence had lower survival rates. We hope our investigation may facilitate a further prospective study and clinical decision-making in LS. BioMed Central 2017-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5469180/ /pubmed/28606068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3398-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Knebel, Carolin Lenze, Ulrich Pohlig, Florian Lenze, Florian Harrasser, Norbert Suren, Christian Breitenbach, Jonathan Rechl, Hans von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger Mühlhofer, Heinrich M. L. Prognostic factors and outcome of Liposarcoma patients: a retrospective evaluation over 15 years |
title | Prognostic factors and outcome of Liposarcoma patients: a retrospective evaluation over 15 years |
title_full | Prognostic factors and outcome of Liposarcoma patients: a retrospective evaluation over 15 years |
title_fullStr | Prognostic factors and outcome of Liposarcoma patients: a retrospective evaluation over 15 years |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic factors and outcome of Liposarcoma patients: a retrospective evaluation over 15 years |
title_short | Prognostic factors and outcome of Liposarcoma patients: a retrospective evaluation over 15 years |
title_sort | prognostic factors and outcome of liposarcoma patients: a retrospective evaluation over 15 years |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5469180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28606068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3398-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT knebelcarolin prognosticfactorsandoutcomeofliposarcomapatientsaretrospectiveevaluationover15years AT lenzeulrich prognosticfactorsandoutcomeofliposarcomapatientsaretrospectiveevaluationover15years AT pohligflorian prognosticfactorsandoutcomeofliposarcomapatientsaretrospectiveevaluationover15years AT lenzeflorian prognosticfactorsandoutcomeofliposarcomapatientsaretrospectiveevaluationover15years AT harrassernorbert prognosticfactorsandoutcomeofliposarcomapatientsaretrospectiveevaluationover15years AT surenchristian prognosticfactorsandoutcomeofliposarcomapatientsaretrospectiveevaluationover15years AT breitenbachjonathan prognosticfactorsandoutcomeofliposarcomapatientsaretrospectiveevaluationover15years AT rechlhans prognosticfactorsandoutcomeofliposarcomapatientsaretrospectiveevaluationover15years AT voneisenhartrotherudiger prognosticfactorsandoutcomeofliposarcomapatientsaretrospectiveevaluationover15years AT muhlhoferheinrichml prognosticfactorsandoutcomeofliposarcomapatientsaretrospectiveevaluationover15years |