Cargando…

Looking for the needle in the kidney transplantation haystack

The diagnosis of acute rejection still relies on renal allograft biopsy. In fact, histological features including C4d staining can be useful to differentiate cellular and antibody-mediated acute rejection. However, the pathogenic mechanism to define the type of rejection is usually assessed by anti-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cruzado, Josep M., Melilli, Edoardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5469560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28638610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfw122
_version_ 1783243600732094464
author Cruzado, Josep M.
Melilli, Edoardo
author_facet Cruzado, Josep M.
Melilli, Edoardo
author_sort Cruzado, Josep M.
collection PubMed
description The diagnosis of acute rejection still relies on renal allograft biopsy. In fact, histological features including C4d staining can be useful to differentiate cellular and antibody-mediated acute rejection. However, the pathogenic mechanism to define the type of rejection is usually assessed by anti-HLA donor specific antibodies (DSA) monitoring. Suspicion of acute rejection is usually based on renal function deterioration. This method has low sensitivity. Moreover, creatinine increase follows graft injury and therefore the diagnosis is performed when there is an ongoing acute rejection. One strategy to overcome the limitation of serum creatinine as predictor of acute rejection is to perform surveillance protocol biopsies. However, the low incidence of subclinical acute rejection among patients treated with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression makes this procedure questionable in terms of cost-effectiveness. In this scenario new biomarkers predicting acute rejection are urgently needed. Ideally, such biomarkers should anticipate acute rejection, thus allowing preventive actions such as maintenance immunosupression intensification and/or modification. Alternatively, these new biomarkers should at least improve the predictive value of serum creatinine monitoring. Although many of the new biomarkers are promising, none have been translated to the clinic to date because of a lack of validation studies and the existence of major methodological concerns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5469560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54695602017-06-21 Looking for the needle in the kidney transplantation haystack Cruzado, Josep M. Melilli, Edoardo Clin Kidney J Transplantation The diagnosis of acute rejection still relies on renal allograft biopsy. In fact, histological features including C4d staining can be useful to differentiate cellular and antibody-mediated acute rejection. However, the pathogenic mechanism to define the type of rejection is usually assessed by anti-HLA donor specific antibodies (DSA) monitoring. Suspicion of acute rejection is usually based on renal function deterioration. This method has low sensitivity. Moreover, creatinine increase follows graft injury and therefore the diagnosis is performed when there is an ongoing acute rejection. One strategy to overcome the limitation of serum creatinine as predictor of acute rejection is to perform surveillance protocol biopsies. However, the low incidence of subclinical acute rejection among patients treated with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression makes this procedure questionable in terms of cost-effectiveness. In this scenario new biomarkers predicting acute rejection are urgently needed. Ideally, such biomarkers should anticipate acute rejection, thus allowing preventive actions such as maintenance immunosupression intensification and/or modification. Alternatively, these new biomarkers should at least improve the predictive value of serum creatinine monitoring. Although many of the new biomarkers are promising, none have been translated to the clinic to date because of a lack of validation studies and the existence of major methodological concerns. Oxford University Press 2017-02 2017-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5469560/ /pubmed/28638610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfw122 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Transplantation
Cruzado, Josep M.
Melilli, Edoardo
Looking for the needle in the kidney transplantation haystack
title Looking for the needle in the kidney transplantation haystack
title_full Looking for the needle in the kidney transplantation haystack
title_fullStr Looking for the needle in the kidney transplantation haystack
title_full_unstemmed Looking for the needle in the kidney transplantation haystack
title_short Looking for the needle in the kidney transplantation haystack
title_sort looking for the needle in the kidney transplantation haystack
topic Transplantation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5469560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28638610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfw122
work_keys_str_mv AT cruzadojosepm lookingfortheneedleinthekidneytransplantationhaystack
AT melilliedoardo lookingfortheneedleinthekidneytransplantationhaystack