Cargando…
Non-invasive approaches in the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Part I. In vivo imaging methods
Kidney transplantation (KTx) represents the best available treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Still, full benefits of KTx are undermined by acute rejection (AR). The diagnosis of AR ultimately relies on transplant needle biopsy. However, such an invasive procedure is associated wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5469561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28643821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfw062 |
_version_ | 1783243600981655552 |
---|---|
author | Hanssen, Oriane Erpicum, Pauline Lovinfosse, Pierre Meunier, Paul Weekers, Laurent Tshibanda, Luaba Krzesinski, Jean-Marie Hustinx, Roland Jouret, François |
author_facet | Hanssen, Oriane Erpicum, Pauline Lovinfosse, Pierre Meunier, Paul Weekers, Laurent Tshibanda, Luaba Krzesinski, Jean-Marie Hustinx, Roland Jouret, François |
author_sort | Hanssen, Oriane |
collection | PubMed |
description | Kidney transplantation (KTx) represents the best available treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Still, full benefits of KTx are undermined by acute rejection (AR). The diagnosis of AR ultimately relies on transplant needle biopsy. However, such an invasive procedure is associated with a significant risk of complications and is limited by sampling error and interobserver variability. In the present review, we summarize the current literature about non-invasive approaches for the diagnosis of AR in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), including in vivo imaging, gene expression profiling and omics analyses of blood and urine samples. Most imaging techniques, like contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance, exploit the fact that blood flow is significantly lowered in case of AR-induced inflammation. In addition, AR-associated recruitment of activated leukocytes may be detectable by (18)F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography. In parallel, urine biomarkers, including CXCL9/CXCL10 or a three-gene signature of CD3ε, IP-10 and 18S RNA levels, have been identified. None of these approaches has been adopted yet in the clinical follow-up of KTRs, but standardization of procedures may help assess reproducibility and compare diagnostic yields in large prospective multicentric trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5469561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54695612017-06-21 Non-invasive approaches in the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Part I. In vivo imaging methods Hanssen, Oriane Erpicum, Pauline Lovinfosse, Pierre Meunier, Paul Weekers, Laurent Tshibanda, Luaba Krzesinski, Jean-Marie Hustinx, Roland Jouret, François Clin Kidney J Transplantation Kidney transplantation (KTx) represents the best available treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Still, full benefits of KTx are undermined by acute rejection (AR). The diagnosis of AR ultimately relies on transplant needle biopsy. However, such an invasive procedure is associated with a significant risk of complications and is limited by sampling error and interobserver variability. In the present review, we summarize the current literature about non-invasive approaches for the diagnosis of AR in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), including in vivo imaging, gene expression profiling and omics analyses of blood and urine samples. Most imaging techniques, like contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance, exploit the fact that blood flow is significantly lowered in case of AR-induced inflammation. In addition, AR-associated recruitment of activated leukocytes may be detectable by (18)F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography. In parallel, urine biomarkers, including CXCL9/CXCL10 or a three-gene signature of CD3ε, IP-10 and 18S RNA levels, have been identified. None of these approaches has been adopted yet in the clinical follow-up of KTRs, but standardization of procedures may help assess reproducibility and compare diagnostic yields in large prospective multicentric trials. Oxford University Press 2017-02 2016-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5469561/ /pubmed/28643821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfw062 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Transplantation Hanssen, Oriane Erpicum, Pauline Lovinfosse, Pierre Meunier, Paul Weekers, Laurent Tshibanda, Luaba Krzesinski, Jean-Marie Hustinx, Roland Jouret, François Non-invasive approaches in the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Part I. In vivo imaging methods |
title | Non-invasive approaches in the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Part I. In vivo imaging methods |
title_full | Non-invasive approaches in the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Part I. In vivo imaging methods |
title_fullStr | Non-invasive approaches in the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Part I. In vivo imaging methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-invasive approaches in the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Part I. In vivo imaging methods |
title_short | Non-invasive approaches in the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Part I. In vivo imaging methods |
title_sort | non-invasive approaches in the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. part i. in vivo imaging methods |
topic | Transplantation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5469561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28643821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfw062 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanssenoriane noninvasiveapproachesinthediagnosisofacuterejectioninkidneytransplantrecipientspartiinvivoimagingmethods AT erpicumpauline noninvasiveapproachesinthediagnosisofacuterejectioninkidneytransplantrecipientspartiinvivoimagingmethods AT lovinfossepierre noninvasiveapproachesinthediagnosisofacuterejectioninkidneytransplantrecipientspartiinvivoimagingmethods AT meunierpaul noninvasiveapproachesinthediagnosisofacuterejectioninkidneytransplantrecipientspartiinvivoimagingmethods AT weekerslaurent noninvasiveapproachesinthediagnosisofacuterejectioninkidneytransplantrecipientspartiinvivoimagingmethods AT tshibandaluaba noninvasiveapproachesinthediagnosisofacuterejectioninkidneytransplantrecipientspartiinvivoimagingmethods AT krzesinskijeanmarie noninvasiveapproachesinthediagnosisofacuterejectioninkidneytransplantrecipientspartiinvivoimagingmethods AT hustinxroland noninvasiveapproachesinthediagnosisofacuterejectioninkidneytransplantrecipientspartiinvivoimagingmethods AT jouretfrancois noninvasiveapproachesinthediagnosisofacuterejectioninkidneytransplantrecipientspartiinvivoimagingmethods |