Cargando…

The importance of naming cryptic species and the conservation of endemic subterranean amphipods

Molecular taxonomy often uncovers cryptic species, reminding us that taxonomic incompleteness is even more severe than previous thought. The importance of cryptic species for conservation is poorly understood. Although some cryptic species may be seriously threatened or otherwise important, they are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delić, Teo, Trontelj, Peter, Rendoš, Michal, Fišer, Cene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5469755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28611400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02938-z
_version_ 1783243634242486272
author Delić, Teo
Trontelj, Peter
Rendoš, Michal
Fišer, Cene
author_facet Delić, Teo
Trontelj, Peter
Rendoš, Michal
Fišer, Cene
author_sort Delić, Teo
collection PubMed
description Molecular taxonomy often uncovers cryptic species, reminding us that taxonomic incompleteness is even more severe than previous thought. The importance of cryptic species for conservation is poorly understood. Although some cryptic species may be seriously threatened or otherwise important, they are rarely included in conservation programs as most of them remain undescribed. We analysed the importance of cryptic species in conservation by scrutinizing the South European cryptic complex of the subterranean amphipod Niphargus stygius sensu lato. Using uni- and multilocus delineation methods we show that it consists of 15 parapatric and sympatric species, which we describe using molecular diagnoses. The new species are not mere “taxonomic inflation” as they originate from several distinct branches within the genus and coexist with no evidence of lineage sharing. They are as evolutionarily distinct as average nominal species of the same genus. Ignoring these cryptic species will underestimate the number of subterranean endemics in Slovenia by 12 and in Croatia by four species, although alpha diversity of single caves remains unchanged. The new taxonomy renders national Red Lists largely obsolete, as they list mostly large-ranged species but omit critically endangered single-site endemics. Formal naming of cryptic species is critical for them to be included in conservation policies and faunal listings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5469755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54697552017-06-19 The importance of naming cryptic species and the conservation of endemic subterranean amphipods Delić, Teo Trontelj, Peter Rendoš, Michal Fišer, Cene Sci Rep Article Molecular taxonomy often uncovers cryptic species, reminding us that taxonomic incompleteness is even more severe than previous thought. The importance of cryptic species for conservation is poorly understood. Although some cryptic species may be seriously threatened or otherwise important, they are rarely included in conservation programs as most of them remain undescribed. We analysed the importance of cryptic species in conservation by scrutinizing the South European cryptic complex of the subterranean amphipod Niphargus stygius sensu lato. Using uni- and multilocus delineation methods we show that it consists of 15 parapatric and sympatric species, which we describe using molecular diagnoses. The new species are not mere “taxonomic inflation” as they originate from several distinct branches within the genus and coexist with no evidence of lineage sharing. They are as evolutionarily distinct as average nominal species of the same genus. Ignoring these cryptic species will underestimate the number of subterranean endemics in Slovenia by 12 and in Croatia by four species, although alpha diversity of single caves remains unchanged. The new taxonomy renders national Red Lists largely obsolete, as they list mostly large-ranged species but omit critically endangered single-site endemics. Formal naming of cryptic species is critical for them to be included in conservation policies and faunal listings. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5469755/ /pubmed/28611400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02938-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Delić, Teo
Trontelj, Peter
Rendoš, Michal
Fišer, Cene
The importance of naming cryptic species and the conservation of endemic subterranean amphipods
title The importance of naming cryptic species and the conservation of endemic subterranean amphipods
title_full The importance of naming cryptic species and the conservation of endemic subterranean amphipods
title_fullStr The importance of naming cryptic species and the conservation of endemic subterranean amphipods
title_full_unstemmed The importance of naming cryptic species and the conservation of endemic subterranean amphipods
title_short The importance of naming cryptic species and the conservation of endemic subterranean amphipods
title_sort importance of naming cryptic species and the conservation of endemic subterranean amphipods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5469755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28611400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02938-z
work_keys_str_mv AT delicteo theimportanceofnamingcrypticspeciesandtheconservationofendemicsubterraneanamphipods
AT tronteljpeter theimportanceofnamingcrypticspeciesandtheconservationofendemicsubterraneanamphipods
AT rendosmichal theimportanceofnamingcrypticspeciesandtheconservationofendemicsubterraneanamphipods
AT fisercene theimportanceofnamingcrypticspeciesandtheconservationofendemicsubterraneanamphipods
AT delicteo importanceofnamingcrypticspeciesandtheconservationofendemicsubterraneanamphipods
AT tronteljpeter importanceofnamingcrypticspeciesandtheconservationofendemicsubterraneanamphipods
AT rendosmichal importanceofnamingcrypticspeciesandtheconservationofendemicsubterraneanamphipods
AT fisercene importanceofnamingcrypticspeciesandtheconservationofendemicsubterraneanamphipods