Cargando…

Underutilisation of routinely collected data in the HIV programme in Zambia: a review of quantitatively analysed peer-reviewed articles

BACKGROUND: The extent to which routinely collected HIV data from Zambia has been used in peer-reviewed published articles remains unexplored. This paper is an analysis of peer-reviewed articles that utilised routinely collected HIV data from Zambia within six programme areas from 2004 to 2014. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munthali, Tendai, Musonda, Patrick, Mee, Paul, Gumede, Sehlulekile, Schaap, Ab, Mwinga, Alwyn, Phiri, Caroline, Kapata, Nathan, Michelo, Charles, Todd, Jim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5470192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28610616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0221-9
_version_ 1783243727708356608
author Munthali, Tendai
Musonda, Patrick
Mee, Paul
Gumede, Sehlulekile
Schaap, Ab
Mwinga, Alwyn
Phiri, Caroline
Kapata, Nathan
Michelo, Charles
Todd, Jim
author_facet Munthali, Tendai
Musonda, Patrick
Mee, Paul
Gumede, Sehlulekile
Schaap, Ab
Mwinga, Alwyn
Phiri, Caroline
Kapata, Nathan
Michelo, Charles
Todd, Jim
author_sort Munthali, Tendai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The extent to which routinely collected HIV data from Zambia has been used in peer-reviewed published articles remains unexplored. This paper is an analysis of peer-reviewed articles that utilised routinely collected HIV data from Zambia within six programme areas from 2004 to 2014. METHODS: Articles on HIV, published in English, listed in the Directory of open access journals, African Journals Online, Google scholar, and PubMed were reviewed. Only articles from peer-reviewed journals, that utilised routinely collected data and included quantitative data analysis methods were included. Multi-country studies involving Zambia and another country, where the specific results for Zambia were not reported, as well as clinical trials and intervention studies that did not take place under routine care conditions were excluded, although community trials which referred patients to the routine clinics were included. Independent extraction was conducted using a predesigned data collection form. Pooled analysis was not possible due to diversity in topics reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 69 articles were extracted for review. Of these, 7 were excluded. From the 62 articles reviewed, 39 focused on HIV treatment and retention in care, 15 addressed prevention of mother-to-child transmission, 4 assessed social behavioural change, and 4 reported on voluntary counselling and testing. In our search, no articles were found on condom programming or voluntary male medical circumcision. The most common outcome measures reported were CD4+ count, clinical failure or mortality. The population analysed was children in 13 articles, women in 16 articles, and both adult men and women in 33 articles. CONCLUSION: During the 10 year period of review, only 62 articles were published analysing routinely collected HIV data in Zambia. Serious consideration needs to be made to maximise the utility of routinely collected data, and to benefit from the funds and efforts to collect these data. This could be achieved with government support of operational research and publication of findings based on routinely collected Zambian HIV data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5470192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54701922017-06-21 Underutilisation of routinely collected data in the HIV programme in Zambia: a review of quantitatively analysed peer-reviewed articles Munthali, Tendai Musonda, Patrick Mee, Paul Gumede, Sehlulekile Schaap, Ab Mwinga, Alwyn Phiri, Caroline Kapata, Nathan Michelo, Charles Todd, Jim Health Res Policy Syst Review BACKGROUND: The extent to which routinely collected HIV data from Zambia has been used in peer-reviewed published articles remains unexplored. This paper is an analysis of peer-reviewed articles that utilised routinely collected HIV data from Zambia within six programme areas from 2004 to 2014. METHODS: Articles on HIV, published in English, listed in the Directory of open access journals, African Journals Online, Google scholar, and PubMed were reviewed. Only articles from peer-reviewed journals, that utilised routinely collected data and included quantitative data analysis methods were included. Multi-country studies involving Zambia and another country, where the specific results for Zambia were not reported, as well as clinical trials and intervention studies that did not take place under routine care conditions were excluded, although community trials which referred patients to the routine clinics were included. Independent extraction was conducted using a predesigned data collection form. Pooled analysis was not possible due to diversity in topics reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 69 articles were extracted for review. Of these, 7 were excluded. From the 62 articles reviewed, 39 focused on HIV treatment and retention in care, 15 addressed prevention of mother-to-child transmission, 4 assessed social behavioural change, and 4 reported on voluntary counselling and testing. In our search, no articles were found on condom programming or voluntary male medical circumcision. The most common outcome measures reported were CD4+ count, clinical failure or mortality. The population analysed was children in 13 articles, women in 16 articles, and both adult men and women in 33 articles. CONCLUSION: During the 10 year period of review, only 62 articles were published analysing routinely collected HIV data in Zambia. Serious consideration needs to be made to maximise the utility of routinely collected data, and to benefit from the funds and efforts to collect these data. This could be achieved with government support of operational research and publication of findings based on routinely collected Zambian HIV data. BioMed Central 2017-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5470192/ /pubmed/28610616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0221-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Munthali, Tendai
Musonda, Patrick
Mee, Paul
Gumede, Sehlulekile
Schaap, Ab
Mwinga, Alwyn
Phiri, Caroline
Kapata, Nathan
Michelo, Charles
Todd, Jim
Underutilisation of routinely collected data in the HIV programme in Zambia: a review of quantitatively analysed peer-reviewed articles
title Underutilisation of routinely collected data in the HIV programme in Zambia: a review of quantitatively analysed peer-reviewed articles
title_full Underutilisation of routinely collected data in the HIV programme in Zambia: a review of quantitatively analysed peer-reviewed articles
title_fullStr Underutilisation of routinely collected data in the HIV programme in Zambia: a review of quantitatively analysed peer-reviewed articles
title_full_unstemmed Underutilisation of routinely collected data in the HIV programme in Zambia: a review of quantitatively analysed peer-reviewed articles
title_short Underutilisation of routinely collected data in the HIV programme in Zambia: a review of quantitatively analysed peer-reviewed articles
title_sort underutilisation of routinely collected data in the hiv programme in zambia: a review of quantitatively analysed peer-reviewed articles
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5470192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28610616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0221-9
work_keys_str_mv AT munthalitendai underutilisationofroutinelycollecteddatainthehivprogrammeinzambiaareviewofquantitativelyanalysedpeerreviewedarticles
AT musondapatrick underutilisationofroutinelycollecteddatainthehivprogrammeinzambiaareviewofquantitativelyanalysedpeerreviewedarticles
AT meepaul underutilisationofroutinelycollecteddatainthehivprogrammeinzambiaareviewofquantitativelyanalysedpeerreviewedarticles
AT gumedesehlulekile underutilisationofroutinelycollecteddatainthehivprogrammeinzambiaareviewofquantitativelyanalysedpeerreviewedarticles
AT schaapab underutilisationofroutinelycollecteddatainthehivprogrammeinzambiaareviewofquantitativelyanalysedpeerreviewedarticles
AT mwingaalwyn underutilisationofroutinelycollecteddatainthehivprogrammeinzambiaareviewofquantitativelyanalysedpeerreviewedarticles
AT phiricaroline underutilisationofroutinelycollecteddatainthehivprogrammeinzambiaareviewofquantitativelyanalysedpeerreviewedarticles
AT kapatanathan underutilisationofroutinelycollecteddatainthehivprogrammeinzambiaareviewofquantitativelyanalysedpeerreviewedarticles
AT michelocharles underutilisationofroutinelycollecteddatainthehivprogrammeinzambiaareviewofquantitativelyanalysedpeerreviewedarticles
AT toddjim underutilisationofroutinelycollecteddatainthehivprogrammeinzambiaareviewofquantitativelyanalysedpeerreviewedarticles