Cargando…

Comment (2) on “Formation of the Isthmus of Panama” by O’Dea et al.

O’Dea et al. challenged the inference that the Isthmus of Panama has been in place for the last 10 million years or more and from “an exhaustive review and reanalysis of geological, paleontological, and molecular records,” they argued for a “formation of the Isthmus of Panama sensu stricto around 2....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Molnar, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for the Advancement of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5470827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28630902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602320
_version_ 1783243831923179520
author Molnar, Peter
author_facet Molnar, Peter
author_sort Molnar, Peter
collection PubMed
description O’Dea et al. challenged the inference that the Isthmus of Panama has been in place for the last 10 million years or more and from “an exhaustive review and reanalysis of geological, paleontological, and molecular records,” they argued for a “formation of the Isthmus of Panama sensu stricto around 2.8 Ma.” I review environmental changes since ~5 Ma throughout Earth, and I argue that environmental changes in the Central American-Caribbean region have been part of a concurrent, worldwide phenomenon that requires a global, not local, explanation. Accordingly, evidence of environmental change from the Central American-Caribbean region does not implicate the emergence of the Isthmus of Panama.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5470827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher American Association for the Advancement of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54708272017-06-19 Comment (2) on “Formation of the Isthmus of Panama” by O’Dea et al. Molnar, Peter Sci Adv Technical Comments O’Dea et al. challenged the inference that the Isthmus of Panama has been in place for the last 10 million years or more and from “an exhaustive review and reanalysis of geological, paleontological, and molecular records,” they argued for a “formation of the Isthmus of Panama sensu stricto around 2.8 Ma.” I review environmental changes since ~5 Ma throughout Earth, and I argue that environmental changes in the Central American-Caribbean region have been part of a concurrent, worldwide phenomenon that requires a global, not local, explanation. Accordingly, evidence of environmental change from the Central American-Caribbean region does not implicate the emergence of the Isthmus of Panama. American Association for the Advancement of Science 2017-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5470827/ /pubmed/28630902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602320 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Comments
Molnar, Peter
Comment (2) on “Formation of the Isthmus of Panama” by O’Dea et al.
title Comment (2) on “Formation of the Isthmus of Panama” by O’Dea et al.
title_full Comment (2) on “Formation of the Isthmus of Panama” by O’Dea et al.
title_fullStr Comment (2) on “Formation of the Isthmus of Panama” by O’Dea et al.
title_full_unstemmed Comment (2) on “Formation of the Isthmus of Panama” by O’Dea et al.
title_short Comment (2) on “Formation of the Isthmus of Panama” by O’Dea et al.
title_sort comment (2) on “formation of the isthmus of panama” by o’dea et al.
topic Technical Comments
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5470827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28630902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602320
work_keys_str_mv AT molnarpeter comment2onformationoftheisthmusofpanamabyodeaetal