Cargando…

Clarithromycin versus Gemifloxacin in Quadruple Therapeutic Regimens for Helicobacter Pylori Infection Eradication

BACKGROUND Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is a major casual factor in any peptic diseases. Clarithromycin as one of the drugs recommended for the infection eradication regimen has shown different levels of resistance. The present study is comparing the effectiveness of clarithromycin- and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mansour-Ghanaei, Fariborz, Pedarpour, Zahra, Shafaghi, Afshin, Joukar, Farahnaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Association of Gastroerterology and Hepatology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5471100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28638586
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/mejdd.2017.58
_version_ 1783243883933597696
author Mansour-Ghanaei, Fariborz
Pedarpour, Zahra
Shafaghi, Afshin
Joukar, Farahnaz
author_facet Mansour-Ghanaei, Fariborz
Pedarpour, Zahra
Shafaghi, Afshin
Joukar, Farahnaz
author_sort Mansour-Ghanaei, Fariborz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is a major casual factor in any peptic diseases. Clarithromycin as one of the drugs recommended for the infection eradication regimen has shown different levels of resistance. The present study is comparing the effectiveness of clarithromycin- and gemifloxacin - based quadruple regimens in H. pylori eradication. METHODS This was a prospective double blind randomized clinical trial on patients with clear indication of H. pylori eradication. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: "BPAC group" treated with bismuth subcitrate (240 mg), pantoprazole (20 mg), amoxicillin (1 gr), and clarithromycin (500 mg), all twice daily, and the "BPAG group" treated with bismuth subcitrate, pantoprazole, and amoxicillin with same doses as "BPAC group" and gemifloxacin (320 mg daily) all for 10 days. Three months after the end of therapy, 14C-Urea breath test was performed to confirm the eradication. All the patients were assessed for compliance and drug side effects. Based on per-protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) methods, data were analyzed and a P value<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. This project has been registered in the Iranian registry of clinical trials (IRCT). RESULTS Three patients were excluded from the survey and finally, 179 patients (89 patients in BPAC group and 90 patients in BPAG group) including 71(39.66%) men with the mean age of 46.4±12.3 years completed the treatment period. The incidence of side effects between the two study groups did not differ significantly. The success rate of BPAC regimen eradication was remarkably greater than BPAG regimen (ITT analysis; 89% vs 77%, respectively; CI 95%: 1.072-5.507, P<0.015 and PP analysis; 91% vs 77.8% respectively; CI 95%: P<0.015). There was no significant relationship between the demographic features and the eradication results. CONCLUSION The results showed that gemifloxacin is not a good alternative for clarithromycin in H. pylori eradication regimens in our region.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5471100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Iranian Association of Gastroerterology and Hepatology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54711002017-06-21 Clarithromycin versus Gemifloxacin in Quadruple Therapeutic Regimens for Helicobacter Pylori Infection Eradication Mansour-Ghanaei, Fariborz Pedarpour, Zahra Shafaghi, Afshin Joukar, Farahnaz Middle East J Dig Dis Original Article BACKGROUND Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is a major casual factor in any peptic diseases. Clarithromycin as one of the drugs recommended for the infection eradication regimen has shown different levels of resistance. The present study is comparing the effectiveness of clarithromycin- and gemifloxacin - based quadruple regimens in H. pylori eradication. METHODS This was a prospective double blind randomized clinical trial on patients with clear indication of H. pylori eradication. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: "BPAC group" treated with bismuth subcitrate (240 mg), pantoprazole (20 mg), amoxicillin (1 gr), and clarithromycin (500 mg), all twice daily, and the "BPAG group" treated with bismuth subcitrate, pantoprazole, and amoxicillin with same doses as "BPAC group" and gemifloxacin (320 mg daily) all for 10 days. Three months after the end of therapy, 14C-Urea breath test was performed to confirm the eradication. All the patients were assessed for compliance and drug side effects. Based on per-protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) methods, data were analyzed and a P value<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. This project has been registered in the Iranian registry of clinical trials (IRCT). RESULTS Three patients were excluded from the survey and finally, 179 patients (89 patients in BPAC group and 90 patients in BPAG group) including 71(39.66%) men with the mean age of 46.4±12.3 years completed the treatment period. The incidence of side effects between the two study groups did not differ significantly. The success rate of BPAC regimen eradication was remarkably greater than BPAG regimen (ITT analysis; 89% vs 77%, respectively; CI 95%: 1.072-5.507, P<0.015 and PP analysis; 91% vs 77.8% respectively; CI 95%: P<0.015). There was no significant relationship between the demographic features and the eradication results. CONCLUSION The results showed that gemifloxacin is not a good alternative for clarithromycin in H. pylori eradication regimens in our region. Iranian Association of Gastroerterology and Hepatology 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5471100/ /pubmed/28638586 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/mejdd.2017.58 Text en © 2017 by Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases This work is published by Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases as an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mansour-Ghanaei, Fariborz
Pedarpour, Zahra
Shafaghi, Afshin
Joukar, Farahnaz
Clarithromycin versus Gemifloxacin in Quadruple Therapeutic Regimens for Helicobacter Pylori Infection Eradication
title Clarithromycin versus Gemifloxacin in Quadruple Therapeutic Regimens for Helicobacter Pylori Infection Eradication
title_full Clarithromycin versus Gemifloxacin in Quadruple Therapeutic Regimens for Helicobacter Pylori Infection Eradication
title_fullStr Clarithromycin versus Gemifloxacin in Quadruple Therapeutic Regimens for Helicobacter Pylori Infection Eradication
title_full_unstemmed Clarithromycin versus Gemifloxacin in Quadruple Therapeutic Regimens for Helicobacter Pylori Infection Eradication
title_short Clarithromycin versus Gemifloxacin in Quadruple Therapeutic Regimens for Helicobacter Pylori Infection Eradication
title_sort clarithromycin versus gemifloxacin in quadruple therapeutic regimens for helicobacter pylori infection eradication
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5471100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28638586
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/mejdd.2017.58
work_keys_str_mv AT mansourghanaeifariborz clarithromycinversusgemifloxacininquadrupletherapeuticregimensforhelicobacterpyloriinfectioneradication
AT pedarpourzahra clarithromycinversusgemifloxacininquadrupletherapeuticregimensforhelicobacterpyloriinfectioneradication
AT shafaghiafshin clarithromycinversusgemifloxacininquadrupletherapeuticregimensforhelicobacterpyloriinfectioneradication
AT joukarfarahnaz clarithromycinversusgemifloxacininquadrupletherapeuticregimensforhelicobacterpyloriinfectioneradication