Cargando…
Impact of Mid-Luteal Phase GnRH Agonist Administration on Reproductive Outcomes in GnRH Agonist-Triggered Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVE: To explore whether the addition of a mid-luteal bolus of GnRH agonist (GnRHa) improves the implantation rate (IR) in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Private IVF center. PATIENTS: 328 IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients were tr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5471294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28663739 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2017.00124 |
_version_ | 1783243921301700608 |
---|---|
author | Benmachiche, Abdelhamid Benbouhedja, Sebti Zoghmar, Abdelali Boularak, Amel Humaidan, Peter |
author_facet | Benmachiche, Abdelhamid Benbouhedja, Sebti Zoghmar, Abdelali Boularak, Amel Humaidan, Peter |
author_sort | Benmachiche, Abdelhamid |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To explore whether the addition of a mid-luteal bolus of GnRH agonist (GnRHa) improves the implantation rate (IR) in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Private IVF center. PATIENTS: 328 IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients were triggered with GnRHa and received 1,500 IU HCG on the day of oocyte pick-up (OPU) in addition to a standard luteal phase support (LPS). INTERVENTION(S): In addition, the study group received a bolus of GnRHa 6 days after OPU, whereas the control group did not. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Implantation rate. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ongoing pregnancy (OP) and live birth (LB) rates. RESULTS: Although serum concentrations of FSH, LH, E2, and P on day OPU + 7 were significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group, the IR was not statistically different between the treatment group (27%) and the control group (23%) [odds ratio (OR) 1.2 (95% CI 0.9–1.7), P < 0.27]. Similarly, the OP rate was 37% in the treatment group and 31% in the control group [OR 1.3 (95% CI 0.8–2.0), P < 0.23]. The LB rate was 36% in the treatment group and 31% in the control group [OR: 1.3 (95% CI 0.8–2.0), P < 0.27]. CONCLUSION: Although a trend toward a higher IR and pregnancy rate was observed in the treatment group, this difference was not statistically significant. However, the absolute risk difference of 5% found for LB is clinically relevant, warranting further investigation. NCT: 02053779. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5471294 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54712942017-06-29 Impact of Mid-Luteal Phase GnRH Agonist Administration on Reproductive Outcomes in GnRH Agonist-Triggered Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial Benmachiche, Abdelhamid Benbouhedja, Sebti Zoghmar, Abdelali Boularak, Amel Humaidan, Peter Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: To explore whether the addition of a mid-luteal bolus of GnRH agonist (GnRHa) improves the implantation rate (IR) in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Private IVF center. PATIENTS: 328 IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients were triggered with GnRHa and received 1,500 IU HCG on the day of oocyte pick-up (OPU) in addition to a standard luteal phase support (LPS). INTERVENTION(S): In addition, the study group received a bolus of GnRHa 6 days after OPU, whereas the control group did not. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Implantation rate. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ongoing pregnancy (OP) and live birth (LB) rates. RESULTS: Although serum concentrations of FSH, LH, E2, and P on day OPU + 7 were significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group, the IR was not statistically different between the treatment group (27%) and the control group (23%) [odds ratio (OR) 1.2 (95% CI 0.9–1.7), P < 0.27]. Similarly, the OP rate was 37% in the treatment group and 31% in the control group [OR 1.3 (95% CI 0.8–2.0), P < 0.23]. The LB rate was 36% in the treatment group and 31% in the control group [OR: 1.3 (95% CI 0.8–2.0), P < 0.27]. CONCLUSION: Although a trend toward a higher IR and pregnancy rate was observed in the treatment group, this difference was not statistically significant. However, the absolute risk difference of 5% found for LB is clinically relevant, warranting further investigation. NCT: 02053779. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5471294/ /pubmed/28663739 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2017.00124 Text en Copyright © 2017 Benmachiche, Benbouhedja, Zoghmar, Boularak and Humaidan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology Benmachiche, Abdelhamid Benbouhedja, Sebti Zoghmar, Abdelali Boularak, Amel Humaidan, Peter Impact of Mid-Luteal Phase GnRH Agonist Administration on Reproductive Outcomes in GnRH Agonist-Triggered Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Impact of Mid-Luteal Phase GnRH Agonist Administration on Reproductive Outcomes in GnRH Agonist-Triggered Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Impact of Mid-Luteal Phase GnRH Agonist Administration on Reproductive Outcomes in GnRH Agonist-Triggered Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Impact of Mid-Luteal Phase GnRH Agonist Administration on Reproductive Outcomes in GnRH Agonist-Triggered Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Mid-Luteal Phase GnRH Agonist Administration on Reproductive Outcomes in GnRH Agonist-Triggered Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Impact of Mid-Luteal Phase GnRH Agonist Administration on Reproductive Outcomes in GnRH Agonist-Triggered Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | impact of mid-luteal phase gnrh agonist administration on reproductive outcomes in gnrh agonist-triggered cycles: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5471294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28663739 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2017.00124 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benmachicheabdelhamid impactofmidlutealphasegnrhagonistadministrationonreproductiveoutcomesingnrhagonisttriggeredcyclesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT benbouhedjasebti impactofmidlutealphasegnrhagonistadministrationonreproductiveoutcomesingnrhagonisttriggeredcyclesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zoghmarabdelali impactofmidlutealphasegnrhagonistadministrationonreproductiveoutcomesingnrhagonisttriggeredcyclesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT boularakamel impactofmidlutealphasegnrhagonistadministrationonreproductiveoutcomesingnrhagonisttriggeredcyclesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT humaidanpeter impactofmidlutealphasegnrhagonistadministrationonreproductiveoutcomesingnrhagonisttriggeredcyclesarandomizedcontrolledtrial |