Cargando…

Impact of Mid-Luteal Phase GnRH Agonist Administration on Reproductive Outcomes in GnRH Agonist-Triggered Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether the addition of a mid-luteal bolus of GnRH agonist (GnRHa) improves the implantation rate (IR) in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Private IVF center. PATIENTS: 328 IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients were tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benmachiche, Abdelhamid, Benbouhedja, Sebti, Zoghmar, Abdelali, Boularak, Amel, Humaidan, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5471294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28663739
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2017.00124
_version_ 1783243921301700608
author Benmachiche, Abdelhamid
Benbouhedja, Sebti
Zoghmar, Abdelali
Boularak, Amel
Humaidan, Peter
author_facet Benmachiche, Abdelhamid
Benbouhedja, Sebti
Zoghmar, Abdelali
Boularak, Amel
Humaidan, Peter
author_sort Benmachiche, Abdelhamid
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore whether the addition of a mid-luteal bolus of GnRH agonist (GnRHa) improves the implantation rate (IR) in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Private IVF center. PATIENTS: 328 IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients were triggered with GnRHa and received 1,500 IU HCG on the day of oocyte pick-up (OPU) in addition to a standard luteal phase support (LPS). INTERVENTION(S): In addition, the study group received a bolus of GnRHa 6 days after OPU, whereas the control group did not. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Implantation rate. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ongoing pregnancy (OP) and live birth (LB) rates. RESULTS: Although serum concentrations of FSH, LH, E2, and P on day OPU + 7 were significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group, the IR was not statistically different between the treatment group (27%) and the control group (23%) [odds ratio (OR) 1.2 (95% CI 0.9–1.7), P < 0.27]. Similarly, the OP rate was 37% in the treatment group and 31% in the control group [OR 1.3 (95% CI 0.8–2.0), P < 0.23]. The LB rate was 36% in the treatment group and 31% in the control group [OR: 1.3 (95% CI 0.8–2.0), P < 0.27]. CONCLUSION: Although a trend toward a higher IR and pregnancy rate was observed in the treatment group, this difference was not statistically significant. However, the absolute risk difference of 5% found for LB is clinically relevant, warranting further investigation. NCT: 02053779.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5471294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54712942017-06-29 Impact of Mid-Luteal Phase GnRH Agonist Administration on Reproductive Outcomes in GnRH Agonist-Triggered Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial Benmachiche, Abdelhamid Benbouhedja, Sebti Zoghmar, Abdelali Boularak, Amel Humaidan, Peter Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: To explore whether the addition of a mid-luteal bolus of GnRH agonist (GnRHa) improves the implantation rate (IR) in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Private IVF center. PATIENTS: 328 IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients were triggered with GnRHa and received 1,500 IU HCG on the day of oocyte pick-up (OPU) in addition to a standard luteal phase support (LPS). INTERVENTION(S): In addition, the study group received a bolus of GnRHa 6 days after OPU, whereas the control group did not. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Implantation rate. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ongoing pregnancy (OP) and live birth (LB) rates. RESULTS: Although serum concentrations of FSH, LH, E2, and P on day OPU + 7 were significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group, the IR was not statistically different between the treatment group (27%) and the control group (23%) [odds ratio (OR) 1.2 (95% CI 0.9–1.7), P < 0.27]. Similarly, the OP rate was 37% in the treatment group and 31% in the control group [OR 1.3 (95% CI 0.8–2.0), P < 0.23]. The LB rate was 36% in the treatment group and 31% in the control group [OR: 1.3 (95% CI 0.8–2.0), P < 0.27]. CONCLUSION: Although a trend toward a higher IR and pregnancy rate was observed in the treatment group, this difference was not statistically significant. However, the absolute risk difference of 5% found for LB is clinically relevant, warranting further investigation. NCT: 02053779. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5471294/ /pubmed/28663739 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2017.00124 Text en Copyright © 2017 Benmachiche, Benbouhedja, Zoghmar, Boularak and Humaidan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Benmachiche, Abdelhamid
Benbouhedja, Sebti
Zoghmar, Abdelali
Boularak, Amel
Humaidan, Peter
Impact of Mid-Luteal Phase GnRH Agonist Administration on Reproductive Outcomes in GnRH Agonist-Triggered Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Impact of Mid-Luteal Phase GnRH Agonist Administration on Reproductive Outcomes in GnRH Agonist-Triggered Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Impact of Mid-Luteal Phase GnRH Agonist Administration on Reproductive Outcomes in GnRH Agonist-Triggered Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Impact of Mid-Luteal Phase GnRH Agonist Administration on Reproductive Outcomes in GnRH Agonist-Triggered Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Mid-Luteal Phase GnRH Agonist Administration on Reproductive Outcomes in GnRH Agonist-Triggered Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Impact of Mid-Luteal Phase GnRH Agonist Administration on Reproductive Outcomes in GnRH Agonist-Triggered Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort impact of mid-luteal phase gnrh agonist administration on reproductive outcomes in gnrh agonist-triggered cycles: a randomized controlled trial
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5471294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28663739
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2017.00124
work_keys_str_mv AT benmachicheabdelhamid impactofmidlutealphasegnrhagonistadministrationonreproductiveoutcomesingnrhagonisttriggeredcyclesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT benbouhedjasebti impactofmidlutealphasegnrhagonistadministrationonreproductiveoutcomesingnrhagonisttriggeredcyclesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zoghmarabdelali impactofmidlutealphasegnrhagonistadministrationonreproductiveoutcomesingnrhagonisttriggeredcyclesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT boularakamel impactofmidlutealphasegnrhagonistadministrationonreproductiveoutcomesingnrhagonisttriggeredcyclesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT humaidanpeter impactofmidlutealphasegnrhagonistadministrationonreproductiveoutcomesingnrhagonisttriggeredcyclesarandomizedcontrolledtrial