Cargando…
Neural Cross-Frequency Coupling Functions
Although neural interactions are usually characterized only by their coupling strength and directionality, there is often a need to go beyond this by establishing the functional mechanisms of the interaction. We introduce the use of dynamical Bayesian inference for estimation of the coupling functio...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5471314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28663726 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2017.00033 |
_version_ | 1783243926075867136 |
---|---|
author | Stankovski, Tomislav Ticcinelli, Valentina McClintock, Peter V. E. Stefanovska, Aneta |
author_facet | Stankovski, Tomislav Ticcinelli, Valentina McClintock, Peter V. E. Stefanovska, Aneta |
author_sort | Stankovski, Tomislav |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although neural interactions are usually characterized only by their coupling strength and directionality, there is often a need to go beyond this by establishing the functional mechanisms of the interaction. We introduce the use of dynamical Bayesian inference for estimation of the coupling functions of neural oscillations in the presence of noise. By grouping the partial functional contributions, the coupling is decomposed into its functional components and its most important characteristics—strength and form—are quantified. The method is applied to characterize the δ-to-α phase-to-phase neural coupling functions from electroencephalographic (EEG) data of the human resting state, and the differences that arise when the eyes are either open (EO) or closed (EC) are evaluated. The δ-to-α phase-to-phase coupling functions were reconstructed, quantified, compared, and followed as they evolved in time. Using phase-shuffled surrogates to test for significance, we show how the strength of the direct coupling, and the similarity and variability of the coupling functions, characterize the EO and EC states for different regions of the brain. We confirm an earlier observation that the direct coupling is stronger during EC, and we show for the first time that the coupling function is significantly less variable. Given the current understanding of the effects of e.g., aging and dementia on δ-waves, as well as the effect of cognitive and emotional tasks on α-waves, one may expect that new insights into the neural mechanisms underlying certain diseases will be obtained from studies of coupling functions. In principle, any pair of coupled oscillations could be studied in the same way as those shown here. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5471314 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54713142017-06-29 Neural Cross-Frequency Coupling Functions Stankovski, Tomislav Ticcinelli, Valentina McClintock, Peter V. E. Stefanovska, Aneta Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience Although neural interactions are usually characterized only by their coupling strength and directionality, there is often a need to go beyond this by establishing the functional mechanisms of the interaction. We introduce the use of dynamical Bayesian inference for estimation of the coupling functions of neural oscillations in the presence of noise. By grouping the partial functional contributions, the coupling is decomposed into its functional components and its most important characteristics—strength and form—are quantified. The method is applied to characterize the δ-to-α phase-to-phase neural coupling functions from electroencephalographic (EEG) data of the human resting state, and the differences that arise when the eyes are either open (EO) or closed (EC) are evaluated. The δ-to-α phase-to-phase coupling functions were reconstructed, quantified, compared, and followed as they evolved in time. Using phase-shuffled surrogates to test for significance, we show how the strength of the direct coupling, and the similarity and variability of the coupling functions, characterize the EO and EC states for different regions of the brain. We confirm an earlier observation that the direct coupling is stronger during EC, and we show for the first time that the coupling function is significantly less variable. Given the current understanding of the effects of e.g., aging and dementia on δ-waves, as well as the effect of cognitive and emotional tasks on α-waves, one may expect that new insights into the neural mechanisms underlying certain diseases will be obtained from studies of coupling functions. In principle, any pair of coupled oscillations could be studied in the same way as those shown here. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5471314/ /pubmed/28663726 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2017.00033 Text en Copyright © 2017 Stankovski, Ticcinelli, McClintock and Stefanovska. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Stankovski, Tomislav Ticcinelli, Valentina McClintock, Peter V. E. Stefanovska, Aneta Neural Cross-Frequency Coupling Functions |
title | Neural Cross-Frequency Coupling Functions |
title_full | Neural Cross-Frequency Coupling Functions |
title_fullStr | Neural Cross-Frequency Coupling Functions |
title_full_unstemmed | Neural Cross-Frequency Coupling Functions |
title_short | Neural Cross-Frequency Coupling Functions |
title_sort | neural cross-frequency coupling functions |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5471314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28663726 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2017.00033 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stankovskitomislav neuralcrossfrequencycouplingfunctions AT ticcinellivalentina neuralcrossfrequencycouplingfunctions AT mcclintockpeterve neuralcrossfrequencycouplingfunctions AT stefanovskaaneta neuralcrossfrequencycouplingfunctions |