Cargando…

Neural Cross-Frequency Coupling Functions

Although neural interactions are usually characterized only by their coupling strength and directionality, there is often a need to go beyond this by establishing the functional mechanisms of the interaction. We introduce the use of dynamical Bayesian inference for estimation of the coupling functio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stankovski, Tomislav, Ticcinelli, Valentina, McClintock, Peter V. E., Stefanovska, Aneta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5471314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28663726
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2017.00033
_version_ 1783243926075867136
author Stankovski, Tomislav
Ticcinelli, Valentina
McClintock, Peter V. E.
Stefanovska, Aneta
author_facet Stankovski, Tomislav
Ticcinelli, Valentina
McClintock, Peter V. E.
Stefanovska, Aneta
author_sort Stankovski, Tomislav
collection PubMed
description Although neural interactions are usually characterized only by their coupling strength and directionality, there is often a need to go beyond this by establishing the functional mechanisms of the interaction. We introduce the use of dynamical Bayesian inference for estimation of the coupling functions of neural oscillations in the presence of noise. By grouping the partial functional contributions, the coupling is decomposed into its functional components and its most important characteristics—strength and form—are quantified. The method is applied to characterize the δ-to-α phase-to-phase neural coupling functions from electroencephalographic (EEG) data of the human resting state, and the differences that arise when the eyes are either open (EO) or closed (EC) are evaluated. The δ-to-α phase-to-phase coupling functions were reconstructed, quantified, compared, and followed as they evolved in time. Using phase-shuffled surrogates to test for significance, we show how the strength of the direct coupling, and the similarity and variability of the coupling functions, characterize the EO and EC states for different regions of the brain. We confirm an earlier observation that the direct coupling is stronger during EC, and we show for the first time that the coupling function is significantly less variable. Given the current understanding of the effects of e.g., aging and dementia on δ-waves, as well as the effect of cognitive and emotional tasks on α-waves, one may expect that new insights into the neural mechanisms underlying certain diseases will be obtained from studies of coupling functions. In principle, any pair of coupled oscillations could be studied in the same way as those shown here.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5471314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54713142017-06-29 Neural Cross-Frequency Coupling Functions Stankovski, Tomislav Ticcinelli, Valentina McClintock, Peter V. E. Stefanovska, Aneta Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience Although neural interactions are usually characterized only by their coupling strength and directionality, there is often a need to go beyond this by establishing the functional mechanisms of the interaction. We introduce the use of dynamical Bayesian inference for estimation of the coupling functions of neural oscillations in the presence of noise. By grouping the partial functional contributions, the coupling is decomposed into its functional components and its most important characteristics—strength and form—are quantified. The method is applied to characterize the δ-to-α phase-to-phase neural coupling functions from electroencephalographic (EEG) data of the human resting state, and the differences that arise when the eyes are either open (EO) or closed (EC) are evaluated. The δ-to-α phase-to-phase coupling functions were reconstructed, quantified, compared, and followed as they evolved in time. Using phase-shuffled surrogates to test for significance, we show how the strength of the direct coupling, and the similarity and variability of the coupling functions, characterize the EO and EC states for different regions of the brain. We confirm an earlier observation that the direct coupling is stronger during EC, and we show for the first time that the coupling function is significantly less variable. Given the current understanding of the effects of e.g., aging and dementia on δ-waves, as well as the effect of cognitive and emotional tasks on α-waves, one may expect that new insights into the neural mechanisms underlying certain diseases will be obtained from studies of coupling functions. In principle, any pair of coupled oscillations could be studied in the same way as those shown here. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5471314/ /pubmed/28663726 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2017.00033 Text en Copyright © 2017 Stankovski, Ticcinelli, McClintock and Stefanovska. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Stankovski, Tomislav
Ticcinelli, Valentina
McClintock, Peter V. E.
Stefanovska, Aneta
Neural Cross-Frequency Coupling Functions
title Neural Cross-Frequency Coupling Functions
title_full Neural Cross-Frequency Coupling Functions
title_fullStr Neural Cross-Frequency Coupling Functions
title_full_unstemmed Neural Cross-Frequency Coupling Functions
title_short Neural Cross-Frequency Coupling Functions
title_sort neural cross-frequency coupling functions
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5471314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28663726
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2017.00033
work_keys_str_mv AT stankovskitomislav neuralcrossfrequencycouplingfunctions
AT ticcinellivalentina neuralcrossfrequencycouplingfunctions
AT mcclintockpeterve neuralcrossfrequencycouplingfunctions
AT stefanovskaaneta neuralcrossfrequencycouplingfunctions