Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculosis diagnosis in South Africa: a real-world cost analysis and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND: In 2010 a new diagnostic test for tuberculosis, Xpert MTB/RIF, received a conditional programmatic recommendation from WHO. Several model-based economic evaluations predicted that Xpert would be cost-effective across sub-Saharan Africa. We investigated the cost-effectiveness of Xpert in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vassall, Anna, Siapka, Mariana, Foster, Nicola, Cunnama, Lucy, Ramma, Lebogang, Fielding, Katherine, McCarthy, Kerrigan, Churchyard, Gavin, Grant, Alison, Sinanovic, Edina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5471605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28619229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30205-X
_version_ 1783243980811534336
author Vassall, Anna
Siapka, Mariana
Foster, Nicola
Cunnama, Lucy
Ramma, Lebogang
Fielding, Katherine
McCarthy, Kerrigan
Churchyard, Gavin
Grant, Alison
Sinanovic, Edina
author_facet Vassall, Anna
Siapka, Mariana
Foster, Nicola
Cunnama, Lucy
Ramma, Lebogang
Fielding, Katherine
McCarthy, Kerrigan
Churchyard, Gavin
Grant, Alison
Sinanovic, Edina
author_sort Vassall, Anna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2010 a new diagnostic test for tuberculosis, Xpert MTB/RIF, received a conditional programmatic recommendation from WHO. Several model-based economic evaluations predicted that Xpert would be cost-effective across sub-Saharan Africa. We investigated the cost-effectiveness of Xpert in the real world during national roll-out in South Africa. METHODS: For this real-world cost analysis and economic evaluation, we applied extensive primary cost and patient event data from the XTEND study, a pragmatic trial examining Xpert introduction for people investigated for tuberculosis in 40 primary health facilities (20 clusters) in South Africa enrolled between June 8, and Nov 16, 2012, to estimate the costs and cost per disability-adjusted life-year averted of introducing Xpert as the initial diagnostic test for tuberculosis, compared with sputum smear microscopy (the standard of care). FINDINGS: The mean total cost per study participant for tuberculosis investigation and treatment was US$312·58 (95% CI 252·46–372·70) in the Xpert group and $298·58 (246·35–350·82) in the microscopy group. The mean health service (provider) cost per study participant was $168·79 (149·16–188·42) for the Xpert group and $160·46 (143·24–177·68) for the microscopy group of the study. Considering uncertainty in both cost and effect using a wide range of willingness to pay thresholds, we found less than 3% probability that Xpert introduction improved the cost-effectiveness of tuberculosis diagnostics. INTERPRETATION: After analysing extensive primary data collection during roll-out, we found that Xpert introduction in South Africa was cost-neutral, but found no evidence that Xpert improved the cost-effectiveness of tuberculosis diagnosis. Our study highlights the importance of considering implementation constraints, when predicting and evaluating the cost-effectiveness of new tuberculosis diagnostics in South Africa. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5471605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54716052017-06-23 Cost-effectiveness of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculosis diagnosis in South Africa: a real-world cost analysis and economic evaluation Vassall, Anna Siapka, Mariana Foster, Nicola Cunnama, Lucy Ramma, Lebogang Fielding, Katherine McCarthy, Kerrigan Churchyard, Gavin Grant, Alison Sinanovic, Edina Lancet Glob Health Articles BACKGROUND: In 2010 a new diagnostic test for tuberculosis, Xpert MTB/RIF, received a conditional programmatic recommendation from WHO. Several model-based economic evaluations predicted that Xpert would be cost-effective across sub-Saharan Africa. We investigated the cost-effectiveness of Xpert in the real world during national roll-out in South Africa. METHODS: For this real-world cost analysis and economic evaluation, we applied extensive primary cost and patient event data from the XTEND study, a pragmatic trial examining Xpert introduction for people investigated for tuberculosis in 40 primary health facilities (20 clusters) in South Africa enrolled between June 8, and Nov 16, 2012, to estimate the costs and cost per disability-adjusted life-year averted of introducing Xpert as the initial diagnostic test for tuberculosis, compared with sputum smear microscopy (the standard of care). FINDINGS: The mean total cost per study participant for tuberculosis investigation and treatment was US$312·58 (95% CI 252·46–372·70) in the Xpert group and $298·58 (246·35–350·82) in the microscopy group. The mean health service (provider) cost per study participant was $168·79 (149·16–188·42) for the Xpert group and $160·46 (143·24–177·68) for the microscopy group of the study. Considering uncertainty in both cost and effect using a wide range of willingness to pay thresholds, we found less than 3% probability that Xpert introduction improved the cost-effectiveness of tuberculosis diagnostics. INTERPRETATION: After analysing extensive primary data collection during roll-out, we found that Xpert introduction in South Africa was cost-neutral, but found no evidence that Xpert improved the cost-effectiveness of tuberculosis diagnosis. Our study highlights the importance of considering implementation constraints, when predicting and evaluating the cost-effectiveness of new tuberculosis diagnostics in South Africa. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Elsevier Ltd 2017-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5471605/ /pubmed/28619229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30205-X Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Vassall, Anna
Siapka, Mariana
Foster, Nicola
Cunnama, Lucy
Ramma, Lebogang
Fielding, Katherine
McCarthy, Kerrigan
Churchyard, Gavin
Grant, Alison
Sinanovic, Edina
Cost-effectiveness of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculosis diagnosis in South Africa: a real-world cost analysis and economic evaluation
title Cost-effectiveness of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculosis diagnosis in South Africa: a real-world cost analysis and economic evaluation
title_full Cost-effectiveness of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculosis diagnosis in South Africa: a real-world cost analysis and economic evaluation
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculosis diagnosis in South Africa: a real-world cost analysis and economic evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculosis diagnosis in South Africa: a real-world cost analysis and economic evaluation
title_short Cost-effectiveness of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculosis diagnosis in South Africa: a real-world cost analysis and economic evaluation
title_sort cost-effectiveness of xpert mtb/rif for tuberculosis diagnosis in south africa: a real-world cost analysis and economic evaluation
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5471605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28619229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30205-X
work_keys_str_mv AT vassallanna costeffectivenessofxpertmtbriffortuberculosisdiagnosisinsouthafricaarealworldcostanalysisandeconomicevaluation
AT siapkamariana costeffectivenessofxpertmtbriffortuberculosisdiagnosisinsouthafricaarealworldcostanalysisandeconomicevaluation
AT fosternicola costeffectivenessofxpertmtbriffortuberculosisdiagnosisinsouthafricaarealworldcostanalysisandeconomicevaluation
AT cunnamalucy costeffectivenessofxpertmtbriffortuberculosisdiagnosisinsouthafricaarealworldcostanalysisandeconomicevaluation
AT rammalebogang costeffectivenessofxpertmtbriffortuberculosisdiagnosisinsouthafricaarealworldcostanalysisandeconomicevaluation
AT fieldingkatherine costeffectivenessofxpertmtbriffortuberculosisdiagnosisinsouthafricaarealworldcostanalysisandeconomicevaluation
AT mccarthykerrigan costeffectivenessofxpertmtbriffortuberculosisdiagnosisinsouthafricaarealworldcostanalysisandeconomicevaluation
AT churchyardgavin costeffectivenessofxpertmtbriffortuberculosisdiagnosisinsouthafricaarealworldcostanalysisandeconomicevaluation
AT grantalison costeffectivenessofxpertmtbriffortuberculosisdiagnosisinsouthafricaarealworldcostanalysisandeconomicevaluation
AT sinanovicedina costeffectivenessofxpertmtbriffortuberculosisdiagnosisinsouthafricaarealworldcostanalysisandeconomicevaluation