Cargando…

Surface Coil Intensity Correction in Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Metastases

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical application of phased-array surface coil intensity correction in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in spinal metastases. METHODS: 3 phantoms and 50 patients with a corresponding total number of 80 spinal metastases were included in this study. Fast spin echo T1- an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ren, Hong, Lin, Wei, Ding, Xianjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5471916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28730173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2017-0021
_version_ 1783244044023889920
author Ren, Hong
Lin, Wei
Ding, Xianjun
author_facet Ren, Hong
Lin, Wei
Ding, Xianjun
author_sort Ren, Hong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical application of phased-array surface coil intensity correction in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in spinal metastases. METHODS: 3 phantoms and 50 patients with a corresponding total number of 80 spinal metastases were included in this study. Fast spin echo T1- and T2- weighted MRI with and without surface coil intensity correction was routinely performed for all phantoms and patients. Phantoms were evaluated by means of variance to mean ratio of signal intensity on both T1- and T2- weighted MRI obtained with and without surface coil intensity correction. Spinal metastases were evaluated by image quality scores; reading time per case on both T1- and T2- weighted MRI obtained with and without surface coil intensity correction. RESULTS: Spinal metastases were diagnosed more successfully on MRI with surface coil intensity correction than on MRI with conventional surface coil technique. The variance to mean ratio of signal intensity was 53.36% for original T1-weighted MRI and 53.58% for original T2-weighted MRI. The variance to mean ratio of signal intensity was reduced to 18.99% for T1-weighted MRI with surface coil intensity correction and 22.77% for T2-weighted MRI with surface coil intensity correction. The overall image quality scores (interface conspicuity of lesion and details of lesion) were significantly higher than those of the original MRI. The reading time per case was shorter for MRI with surface coil intensity correction than for MRI without surface coil intensity correction. CONCLUSIONS: Phased-array surface coil intensity correction in MRIs of spinal metastases provides improvements in image quality that leads to more successfully detection and assessment of spinal metastases than original MRI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5471916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54719162017-07-20 Surface Coil Intensity Correction in Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Metastases Ren, Hong Lin, Wei Ding, Xianjun Open Med (Wars) Regular Articles OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical application of phased-array surface coil intensity correction in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in spinal metastases. METHODS: 3 phantoms and 50 patients with a corresponding total number of 80 spinal metastases were included in this study. Fast spin echo T1- and T2- weighted MRI with and without surface coil intensity correction was routinely performed for all phantoms and patients. Phantoms were evaluated by means of variance to mean ratio of signal intensity on both T1- and T2- weighted MRI obtained with and without surface coil intensity correction. Spinal metastases were evaluated by image quality scores; reading time per case on both T1- and T2- weighted MRI obtained with and without surface coil intensity correction. RESULTS: Spinal metastases were diagnosed more successfully on MRI with surface coil intensity correction than on MRI with conventional surface coil technique. The variance to mean ratio of signal intensity was 53.36% for original T1-weighted MRI and 53.58% for original T2-weighted MRI. The variance to mean ratio of signal intensity was reduced to 18.99% for T1-weighted MRI with surface coil intensity correction and 22.77% for T2-weighted MRI with surface coil intensity correction. The overall image quality scores (interface conspicuity of lesion and details of lesion) were significantly higher than those of the original MRI. The reading time per case was shorter for MRI with surface coil intensity correction than for MRI without surface coil intensity correction. CONCLUSIONS: Phased-array surface coil intensity correction in MRIs of spinal metastases provides improvements in image quality that leads to more successfully detection and assessment of spinal metastases than original MRI. De Gruyter 2017-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5471916/ /pubmed/28730173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2017-0021 Text en © 2017Hong Ren et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Regular Articles
Ren, Hong
Lin, Wei
Ding, Xianjun
Surface Coil Intensity Correction in Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Metastases
title Surface Coil Intensity Correction in Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Metastases
title_full Surface Coil Intensity Correction in Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Metastases
title_fullStr Surface Coil Intensity Correction in Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Metastases
title_full_unstemmed Surface Coil Intensity Correction in Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Metastases
title_short Surface Coil Intensity Correction in Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Metastases
title_sort surface coil intensity correction in magnetic resonance imaging in spinal metastases
topic Regular Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5471916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28730173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2017-0021
work_keys_str_mv AT renhong surfacecoilintensitycorrectioninmagneticresonanceimaginginspinalmetastases
AT linwei surfacecoilintensitycorrectioninmagneticresonanceimaginginspinalmetastases
AT dingxianjun surfacecoilintensitycorrectioninmagneticresonanceimaginginspinalmetastases