Cargando…
Contextualization of drug-mediator relations using evidence networks
BACKGROUND: Genomic analysis of drug response can provide unique insights into therapies that can be used to match the “right drug to the right patient.” However, the process of discovering such therapeutic insights using genomic data is not straightforward and represents an area of active investiga...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5471944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28617226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1642-8 |
_version_ | 1783244050628870144 |
---|---|
author | Tran, Hai Joey Speyer, Gil Kiefer, Jeff Kim, Seungchan |
author_facet | Tran, Hai Joey Speyer, Gil Kiefer, Jeff Kim, Seungchan |
author_sort | Tran, Hai Joey |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Genomic analysis of drug response can provide unique insights into therapies that can be used to match the “right drug to the right patient.” However, the process of discovering such therapeutic insights using genomic data is not straightforward and represents an area of active investigation. EDDY (Evaluation of Differential DependencY), a statistical test to detect differential statistical dependencies, is one method that leverages genomic data to identify differential genetic dependencies. EDDY has been used in conjunction with the Cancer Therapeutics Response Portal (CTRP), a dataset with drug-response measurements for more than 400 small molecules, and RNAseq data of cell lines in the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) to find potential drug-mediator pairs. Mediators were identified as genes that showed significant change in genetic statistical dependencies within annotated pathways between drug sensitive and drug non-sensitive cell lines, and the results are presented as a public web-portal (EDDY-CTRP). However, the interpretability of drug-mediator pairs currently hinders further exploration of these potentially valuable results. METHODS: In this study, we address this challenge by constructing evidence networks built with protein and drug interactions from the STITCH and STRING interaction databases. STITCH and STRING are sister databases that catalog known and predicted drug-protein interactions and protein-protein interactions, respectively. Using these two databases, we have developed a method to construct evidence networks to “explain” the relation between a drug and a mediator. RESULTS: We applied this approach to drug-mediator relations discovered in EDDY-CTRP analysis and identified evidence networks for ~70% of drug-mediator pairs where most mediators were not known direct targets for the drug. Constructed evidence networks enable researchers to contextualize the drug-mediator pair with current research and knowledge. Using evidence networks, we were able to improve the interpretability of the EDDY-CTRP results by linking the drugs and mediators with genes associated with both the drug and the mediator. CONCLUSION: We anticipate that these evidence networks will help inform EDDY-CTRP results and enhance the generation of important insights to drug sensitivity that will lead to improved precision medicine applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5471944 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54719442017-06-19 Contextualization of drug-mediator relations using evidence networks Tran, Hai Joey Speyer, Gil Kiefer, Jeff Kim, Seungchan BMC Bioinformatics Research BACKGROUND: Genomic analysis of drug response can provide unique insights into therapies that can be used to match the “right drug to the right patient.” However, the process of discovering such therapeutic insights using genomic data is not straightforward and represents an area of active investigation. EDDY (Evaluation of Differential DependencY), a statistical test to detect differential statistical dependencies, is one method that leverages genomic data to identify differential genetic dependencies. EDDY has been used in conjunction with the Cancer Therapeutics Response Portal (CTRP), a dataset with drug-response measurements for more than 400 small molecules, and RNAseq data of cell lines in the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) to find potential drug-mediator pairs. Mediators were identified as genes that showed significant change in genetic statistical dependencies within annotated pathways between drug sensitive and drug non-sensitive cell lines, and the results are presented as a public web-portal (EDDY-CTRP). However, the interpretability of drug-mediator pairs currently hinders further exploration of these potentially valuable results. METHODS: In this study, we address this challenge by constructing evidence networks built with protein and drug interactions from the STITCH and STRING interaction databases. STITCH and STRING are sister databases that catalog known and predicted drug-protein interactions and protein-protein interactions, respectively. Using these two databases, we have developed a method to construct evidence networks to “explain” the relation between a drug and a mediator. RESULTS: We applied this approach to drug-mediator relations discovered in EDDY-CTRP analysis and identified evidence networks for ~70% of drug-mediator pairs where most mediators were not known direct targets for the drug. Constructed evidence networks enable researchers to contextualize the drug-mediator pair with current research and knowledge. Using evidence networks, we were able to improve the interpretability of the EDDY-CTRP results by linking the drugs and mediators with genes associated with both the drug and the mediator. CONCLUSION: We anticipate that these evidence networks will help inform EDDY-CTRP results and enhance the generation of important insights to drug sensitivity that will lead to improved precision medicine applications. BioMed Central 2017-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5471944/ /pubmed/28617226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1642-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Tran, Hai Joey Speyer, Gil Kiefer, Jeff Kim, Seungchan Contextualization of drug-mediator relations using evidence networks |
title | Contextualization of drug-mediator relations using evidence networks |
title_full | Contextualization of drug-mediator relations using evidence networks |
title_fullStr | Contextualization of drug-mediator relations using evidence networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Contextualization of drug-mediator relations using evidence networks |
title_short | Contextualization of drug-mediator relations using evidence networks |
title_sort | contextualization of drug-mediator relations using evidence networks |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5471944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28617226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1642-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tranhaijoey contextualizationofdrugmediatorrelationsusingevidencenetworks AT speyergil contextualizationofdrugmediatorrelationsusingevidencenetworks AT kieferjeff contextualizationofdrugmediatorrelationsusingevidencenetworks AT kimseungchan contextualizationofdrugmediatorrelationsusingevidencenetworks |