Cargando…

An unpleasant emotional state reduces working memory capacity: electrophysiological evidence

Emotional states can guide the actions and decisions we make in our everyday life through their influence on cognitive processes such as working memory (WM). We investigated the long-lasting interference that an unpleasant emotional state had on goal-relevant WM representations from an electrophysio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Figueira, Jessica S. B., Oliveira, Leticia, Pereira, Mirtes G., Pacheco, Luiza B., Lobo, Isabela, Motta-Ribeiro, Gabriel C., David, Isabel A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5472131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28402534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx030
_version_ 1783244075781062656
author Figueira, Jessica S. B.
Oliveira, Leticia
Pereira, Mirtes G.
Pacheco, Luiza B.
Lobo, Isabela
Motta-Ribeiro, Gabriel C.
David, Isabel A.
author_facet Figueira, Jessica S. B.
Oliveira, Leticia
Pereira, Mirtes G.
Pacheco, Luiza B.
Lobo, Isabela
Motta-Ribeiro, Gabriel C.
David, Isabel A.
author_sort Figueira, Jessica S. B.
collection PubMed
description Emotional states can guide the actions and decisions we make in our everyday life through their influence on cognitive processes such as working memory (WM). We investigated the long-lasting interference that an unpleasant emotional state had on goal-relevant WM representations from an electrophysiological perspective. Participants performed a change detection task that was preceded by the presentation of unpleasant or neutral task-irrelevant pictures in a blocked fashion. We focused on the contralateral delay activity (CDA), an event-related potential that is sensitive to the number of task-relevant items stored in WM. We found that the asymptotic limit for the CDA amplitude was lower during the unpleasant emotional state than during the neutral one; that is, an emotional state was capable of reducing how many task-relevant items the participants could hold in WM. Furthermore, both the individuals who experienced more intrusive thoughts and those who were dispositionally anxious were more susceptible to the influence of the emotional state. We provide evidence that an unpleasant emotional state diminished visual WM for task-relevant items, particularly in susceptible individuals. These results open new avenues to uncover the emotional-cognitive processing that underlies maladaptive WM representations and the role of such processing in the development of mental illness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5472131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54721312017-06-21 An unpleasant emotional state reduces working memory capacity: electrophysiological evidence Figueira, Jessica S. B. Oliveira, Leticia Pereira, Mirtes G. Pacheco, Luiza B. Lobo, Isabela Motta-Ribeiro, Gabriel C. David, Isabel A. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Articles Emotional states can guide the actions and decisions we make in our everyday life through their influence on cognitive processes such as working memory (WM). We investigated the long-lasting interference that an unpleasant emotional state had on goal-relevant WM representations from an electrophysiological perspective. Participants performed a change detection task that was preceded by the presentation of unpleasant or neutral task-irrelevant pictures in a blocked fashion. We focused on the contralateral delay activity (CDA), an event-related potential that is sensitive to the number of task-relevant items stored in WM. We found that the asymptotic limit for the CDA amplitude was lower during the unpleasant emotional state than during the neutral one; that is, an emotional state was capable of reducing how many task-relevant items the participants could hold in WM. Furthermore, both the individuals who experienced more intrusive thoughts and those who were dispositionally anxious were more susceptible to the influence of the emotional state. We provide evidence that an unpleasant emotional state diminished visual WM for task-relevant items, particularly in susceptible individuals. These results open new avenues to uncover the emotional-cognitive processing that underlies maladaptive WM representations and the role of such processing in the development of mental illness. Oxford University Press 2017-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5472131/ /pubmed/28402534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx030 Text en © The Author(s) (2017). Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Figueira, Jessica S. B.
Oliveira, Leticia
Pereira, Mirtes G.
Pacheco, Luiza B.
Lobo, Isabela
Motta-Ribeiro, Gabriel C.
David, Isabel A.
An unpleasant emotional state reduces working memory capacity: electrophysiological evidence
title An unpleasant emotional state reduces working memory capacity: electrophysiological evidence
title_full An unpleasant emotional state reduces working memory capacity: electrophysiological evidence
title_fullStr An unpleasant emotional state reduces working memory capacity: electrophysiological evidence
title_full_unstemmed An unpleasant emotional state reduces working memory capacity: electrophysiological evidence
title_short An unpleasant emotional state reduces working memory capacity: electrophysiological evidence
title_sort unpleasant emotional state reduces working memory capacity: electrophysiological evidence
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5472131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28402534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx030
work_keys_str_mv AT figueirajessicasb anunpleasantemotionalstatereducesworkingmemorycapacityelectrophysiologicalevidence
AT oliveiraleticia anunpleasantemotionalstatereducesworkingmemorycapacityelectrophysiologicalevidence
AT pereiramirtesg anunpleasantemotionalstatereducesworkingmemorycapacityelectrophysiologicalevidence
AT pachecoluizab anunpleasantemotionalstatereducesworkingmemorycapacityelectrophysiologicalevidence
AT loboisabela anunpleasantemotionalstatereducesworkingmemorycapacityelectrophysiologicalevidence
AT mottaribeirogabrielc anunpleasantemotionalstatereducesworkingmemorycapacityelectrophysiologicalevidence
AT davidisabela anunpleasantemotionalstatereducesworkingmemorycapacityelectrophysiologicalevidence
AT figueirajessicasb unpleasantemotionalstatereducesworkingmemorycapacityelectrophysiologicalevidence
AT oliveiraleticia unpleasantemotionalstatereducesworkingmemorycapacityelectrophysiologicalevidence
AT pereiramirtesg unpleasantemotionalstatereducesworkingmemorycapacityelectrophysiologicalevidence
AT pachecoluizab unpleasantemotionalstatereducesworkingmemorycapacityelectrophysiologicalevidence
AT loboisabela unpleasantemotionalstatereducesworkingmemorycapacityelectrophysiologicalevidence
AT mottaribeirogabrielc unpleasantemotionalstatereducesworkingmemorycapacityelectrophysiologicalevidence
AT davidisabela unpleasantemotionalstatereducesworkingmemorycapacityelectrophysiologicalevidence