Cargando…

Intrathoracic Fat Measurements Using Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT): Feasibility and Reproducibility

Intrathoracic fat volume, more specifically, epicardial fat volume, is an emerging imaging biomarker of adverse cardiovascular events. The purpose of this work is to show the feasibility and reproducibility of intrathoracic fat volume measurement applied to contrast-enhanced multidetector computed t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stojanovska, Jadranka, Ibrahim, El-Sayed H., Chughtai, Aamer R., Jackson, Elizabeth A., Gross, Barry H., Jacobson, Jon A., Tsodikov, Alexander, Daneshvar, Brian, Long, Benjamin D., Chenevert, Thomas L., Kazerooni, Ella A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Grapho Publications, LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5472382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28626797
http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2017.00103
Descripción
Sumario:Intrathoracic fat volume, more specifically, epicardial fat volume, is an emerging imaging biomarker of adverse cardiovascular events. The purpose of this work is to show the feasibility and reproducibility of intrathoracic fat volume measurement applied to contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography images. A retrospective cohort study of 62 subjects free of cardiovascular disease (55% females, age = 49 ± 11 years) conducted from 2008 to 2011 formed the study group. Intrathoracic fat volume was defined as all fat voxels measuring −50 to −250 Hounsfield Unit within the intrathoracic cavity from the level of the pulmonary artery bifurcation to the heart apex. The intrathoracic fat was separated into epicardial and extrapericardial fat by tracing the pericardium. The measurements were obtained by 2 readers and compared for interrater reproducibility. The fat volume measurements for the study group were 141 ± 72 cm(3) for intrathoracic fat, 58 ± 27 cm(3) for epicardial fat, and 84 ± 50 cm(3) for extrapericardial fat. There was no statistically significant difference in intrathoracic fat volume measurements between the 2 readers, with correlation coefficients of 0.88 (P = .55) for intrathoracic fat volume and −0.12 (P = .33) for epicardial fat volume. Voxel-based measurement of intrathoracic fat, including the separation into epicardial and extrapericardial fat, is feasible and highly reproducible from multidetector computed tomography scans.