Cargando…

Pooled analysis of two studies evaluating efficacy and safety of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.77% in patients with allergic conjunctivitis

PURPOSE: Two individual phase 3 conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) studies of similar design have assessed the efficacy and safety of olopatadine hydrochloride (HCl) 0.77% for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the integrated efficacy and safety of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McLaurin, Eugene, Bergmann, Mark, Narvekar, Abhijit, Adewale, Adeniyi, Gomes, Paul, Torkildsen, Gail
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5472412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28652694
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S131830
_version_ 1783244116779335680
author McLaurin, Eugene
Bergmann, Mark
Narvekar, Abhijit
Adewale, Adeniyi
Gomes, Paul
Torkildsen, Gail
author_facet McLaurin, Eugene
Bergmann, Mark
Narvekar, Abhijit
Adewale, Adeniyi
Gomes, Paul
Torkildsen, Gail
author_sort McLaurin, Eugene
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Two individual phase 3 conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) studies of similar design have assessed the efficacy and safety of olopatadine hydrochloride (HCl) 0.77% for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the integrated efficacy and safety of olopatadine HCl 0.77% from a larger dataset by pooling data from the two individual CAC studies. METHODS: Data were pooled from two phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double-masked, active- and vehicle-controlled CAC studies. The primary comparison was on ocular itching scores between olopatadine HCl 0.77% versus vehicle (at onset and 24 hours) and olopatadine HCl 0.77% versus olopatadine 0.2% (at 24 hours). Additional end points included conjunctival redness, total redness, and proportion of itching responders at onset and 24-hour duration of CAC. For both primary and secondary analysis, mixed model repeated measures analysis was used, except for proportion of ocular itching responders. Sensitivity analyses were carried out using a two-sample t-test. RESULTS: This analysis included 448 patients. Olopatadine HCl 0.77% was superior to vehicle (P<0.0001) at onset and 24-hour duration of action (difference in means: −1.14 to −1.52) and to olopatadine 0.2% (P=0.0009) at 24-hour duration of action in relieving ocular itch. Additionally, olopatadine HCl 0.77% substantially reduced conjunctival redness and total redness over vehicle and olopatadine 0.2% at onset and 24-hour duration of action. At 24 hours CAC, there were a higher proportion of itching responders with olopatadine HCl 0.77% compared to vehicle or olopatadine 0.2% (difference in proportion of responders: 43.17%, P<0.0001, and 17.25%, P=0.0012, respectively). No safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSION: This analysis confirms the findings from the individual studies. The rapid onset and prolonged duration of action (for 24 hours) of olopatadine HCl 0.77% supports once-daily dosing in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5472412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54724122017-06-26 Pooled analysis of two studies evaluating efficacy and safety of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.77% in patients with allergic conjunctivitis McLaurin, Eugene Bergmann, Mark Narvekar, Abhijit Adewale, Adeniyi Gomes, Paul Torkildsen, Gail Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: Two individual phase 3 conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) studies of similar design have assessed the efficacy and safety of olopatadine hydrochloride (HCl) 0.77% for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the integrated efficacy and safety of olopatadine HCl 0.77% from a larger dataset by pooling data from the two individual CAC studies. METHODS: Data were pooled from two phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double-masked, active- and vehicle-controlled CAC studies. The primary comparison was on ocular itching scores between olopatadine HCl 0.77% versus vehicle (at onset and 24 hours) and olopatadine HCl 0.77% versus olopatadine 0.2% (at 24 hours). Additional end points included conjunctival redness, total redness, and proportion of itching responders at onset and 24-hour duration of CAC. For both primary and secondary analysis, mixed model repeated measures analysis was used, except for proportion of ocular itching responders. Sensitivity analyses were carried out using a two-sample t-test. RESULTS: This analysis included 448 patients. Olopatadine HCl 0.77% was superior to vehicle (P<0.0001) at onset and 24-hour duration of action (difference in means: −1.14 to −1.52) and to olopatadine 0.2% (P=0.0009) at 24-hour duration of action in relieving ocular itch. Additionally, olopatadine HCl 0.77% substantially reduced conjunctival redness and total redness over vehicle and olopatadine 0.2% at onset and 24-hour duration of action. At 24 hours CAC, there were a higher proportion of itching responders with olopatadine HCl 0.77% compared to vehicle or olopatadine 0.2% (difference in proportion of responders: 43.17%, P<0.0001, and 17.25%, P=0.0012, respectively). No safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSION: This analysis confirms the findings from the individual studies. The rapid onset and prolonged duration of action (for 24 hours) of olopatadine HCl 0.77% supports once-daily dosing in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. Dove Medical Press 2017-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5472412/ /pubmed/28652694 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S131830 Text en © 2017 McLaurin et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
McLaurin, Eugene
Bergmann, Mark
Narvekar, Abhijit
Adewale, Adeniyi
Gomes, Paul
Torkildsen, Gail
Pooled analysis of two studies evaluating efficacy and safety of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.77% in patients with allergic conjunctivitis
title Pooled analysis of two studies evaluating efficacy and safety of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.77% in patients with allergic conjunctivitis
title_full Pooled analysis of two studies evaluating efficacy and safety of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.77% in patients with allergic conjunctivitis
title_fullStr Pooled analysis of two studies evaluating efficacy and safety of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.77% in patients with allergic conjunctivitis
title_full_unstemmed Pooled analysis of two studies evaluating efficacy and safety of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.77% in patients with allergic conjunctivitis
title_short Pooled analysis of two studies evaluating efficacy and safety of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.77% in patients with allergic conjunctivitis
title_sort pooled analysis of two studies evaluating efficacy and safety of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.77% in patients with allergic conjunctivitis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5472412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28652694
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S131830
work_keys_str_mv AT mclaurineugene pooledanalysisoftwostudiesevaluatingefficacyandsafetyofolopatadinehydrochloride077inpatientswithallergicconjunctivitis
AT bergmannmark pooledanalysisoftwostudiesevaluatingefficacyandsafetyofolopatadinehydrochloride077inpatientswithallergicconjunctivitis
AT narvekarabhijit pooledanalysisoftwostudiesevaluatingefficacyandsafetyofolopatadinehydrochloride077inpatientswithallergicconjunctivitis
AT adewaleadeniyi pooledanalysisoftwostudiesevaluatingefficacyandsafetyofolopatadinehydrochloride077inpatientswithallergicconjunctivitis
AT gomespaul pooledanalysisoftwostudiesevaluatingefficacyandsafetyofolopatadinehydrochloride077inpatientswithallergicconjunctivitis
AT torkildsengail pooledanalysisoftwostudiesevaluatingefficacyandsafetyofolopatadinehydrochloride077inpatientswithallergicconjunctivitis