Cargando…
Comparing the plant diversity between artificial forest and nature growth forest in a giant panda habitat
Artificial restoration is an important way to restore forests, but little is known about its effect on the habitat restoration of the giant panda. In the present study, we investigated the characteristics of artificial forest in the Wanglang Nature Reserve to determine whether through succession it...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5472610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28620224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03895-3 |
_version_ | 1783244142508244992 |
---|---|
author | Kang, Dongwei Wang, Xiaorong Li, Shuang Li, Junqing |
author_facet | Kang, Dongwei Wang, Xiaorong Li, Shuang Li, Junqing |
author_sort | Kang, Dongwei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Artificial restoration is an important way to restore forests, but little is known about its effect on the habitat restoration of the giant panda. In the present study, we investigated the characteristics of artificial forest in the Wanglang Nature Reserve to determine whether through succession it has formed a suitable habitat for the giant panda. We compared artificial forest characteristics with those of natural habitat used by the giant panda. We found that the dominant tree species in artificial forest differed from those in the natural habitat. The artificial forest had lower plant species richness and diversity in the tree and shrub layers than did the latter, and its community structure was characterized by smaller tree and bamboo sizes, and fewer and lower bamboo clumps, but more trees and larger shrub sizes. The typical community collocation of artificial forest was a “Picea asperata + no-bamboo” model, which differs starkly from the giant panda’s natural habitat. After several years of restoration, the artificial forest has failed to become a suitable habitat for the giant panda. Therefore, a simple way of planting individual trees cannot restore giant panda habitat; instead, habitat restoration should be based on the habitat requirements of the giant panda. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5472610 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54726102017-06-21 Comparing the plant diversity between artificial forest and nature growth forest in a giant panda habitat Kang, Dongwei Wang, Xiaorong Li, Shuang Li, Junqing Sci Rep Article Artificial restoration is an important way to restore forests, but little is known about its effect on the habitat restoration of the giant panda. In the present study, we investigated the characteristics of artificial forest in the Wanglang Nature Reserve to determine whether through succession it has formed a suitable habitat for the giant panda. We compared artificial forest characteristics with those of natural habitat used by the giant panda. We found that the dominant tree species in artificial forest differed from those in the natural habitat. The artificial forest had lower plant species richness and diversity in the tree and shrub layers than did the latter, and its community structure was characterized by smaller tree and bamboo sizes, and fewer and lower bamboo clumps, but more trees and larger shrub sizes. The typical community collocation of artificial forest was a “Picea asperata + no-bamboo” model, which differs starkly from the giant panda’s natural habitat. After several years of restoration, the artificial forest has failed to become a suitable habitat for the giant panda. Therefore, a simple way of planting individual trees cannot restore giant panda habitat; instead, habitat restoration should be based on the habitat requirements of the giant panda. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5472610/ /pubmed/28620224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03895-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Kang, Dongwei Wang, Xiaorong Li, Shuang Li, Junqing Comparing the plant diversity between artificial forest and nature growth forest in a giant panda habitat |
title | Comparing the plant diversity between artificial forest and nature growth forest in a giant panda habitat |
title_full | Comparing the plant diversity between artificial forest and nature growth forest in a giant panda habitat |
title_fullStr | Comparing the plant diversity between artificial forest and nature growth forest in a giant panda habitat |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the plant diversity between artificial forest and nature growth forest in a giant panda habitat |
title_short | Comparing the plant diversity between artificial forest and nature growth forest in a giant panda habitat |
title_sort | comparing the plant diversity between artificial forest and nature growth forest in a giant panda habitat |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5472610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28620224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03895-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kangdongwei comparingtheplantdiversitybetweenartificialforestandnaturegrowthforestinagiantpandahabitat AT wangxiaorong comparingtheplantdiversitybetweenartificialforestandnaturegrowthforestinagiantpandahabitat AT lishuang comparingtheplantdiversitybetweenartificialforestandnaturegrowthforestinagiantpandahabitat AT lijunqing comparingtheplantdiversitybetweenartificialforestandnaturegrowthforestinagiantpandahabitat |