Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of combined directly acting antivirals for treatment of Chinese chronic hepatitis C patients in a real-world setting

AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of combined directly acting antivirals (DAAs) for the treatment of Chinese chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients in a real-world setting. METHODS: Hospitalized CHC patients who were treated with DAAs at Peking University First Hospital between January 2015 and Dec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Jian-Hong, Zeng, Zheng, Zhang, Xia-Xia, Zhang, Yu, Zhang, Ren-Wen, Wang, Shuai, Wu, Chi-Hong, Yu, Min, Liu, Dan, Xi, Hong-Li, Zhou, Yi-Xing, An, Yao-Yu, Xu, Xiao-Yuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5473126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28652660
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i22.4072
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of combined directly acting antivirals (DAAs) for the treatment of Chinese chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients in a real-world setting. METHODS: Hospitalized CHC patients who were treated with DAAs at Peking University First Hospital between January 2015 and December 2016 were enrolled. Samples and clinical data were collected at 0 wk, 2 wk, 4 wk, 8 wk, 12 wk, or 24 wk during DAAs treatment and at 4 wk, 12 wk, and 24 wk after the end of treatment. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients who underwent DAAs treatment were included in our study, of whom 83.3% (45/54) achieved rapid virological response at 2 wk after treatment initiation (RVR 2) and 94.4% (51/54) achieved sustained virological response at 24 wk after the end of treatment (SVR 24). Serum creatinine and uric acid levels at the end of treatment were significantly increased compared with baseline levels (83.6 ± 17.9 vs 88.8 ± 19.4, P(01) < 0.001; 320.8 ± 76.3 vs 354.5 ± 87.6, P(01) < 0.001), and no significant improvements were observed at 24w after the end of treatment (83.6 ± 17.9 vs 86.8 ± 19.1, P(02) = 0.039; 320.8 ± 76.3 vs 345.9 ± 89.4, P(02) = 0.001). The total frequency of adverse events (AEs) during treatment was 33.3% (18/54), with major AEs being fatigue (16.7%), headache (7.4%), anorexia (7.4%), and insomnia (5.6%). CONCLUSION: Though based in a small cohort of patients, the abnormal changes in renal function indices and relative high frequency of AEs during combined DAAs treatment should be taken as a note of caution.