Cargando…

Protecting an island nation from extreme pandemic threats: Proof-of-concept around border closure as an intervention

BACKGROUND: Countries are well advised to prepare for future pandemic risks (e.g., pandemic influenza, novel emerging agents or synthetic bioweapons). These preparations do not typically include planning for complete border closure. Even though border closure may not be instituted in time, and can f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boyd, Matt, Baker, Michael G., Mansoor, Osman D., Kvizhinadze, Giorgi, Wilson, Nick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5473559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28622344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178732
_version_ 1783244308685520896
author Boyd, Matt
Baker, Michael G.
Mansoor, Osman D.
Kvizhinadze, Giorgi
Wilson, Nick
author_facet Boyd, Matt
Baker, Michael G.
Mansoor, Osman D.
Kvizhinadze, Giorgi
Wilson, Nick
author_sort Boyd, Matt
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Countries are well advised to prepare for future pandemic risks (e.g., pandemic influenza, novel emerging agents or synthetic bioweapons). These preparations do not typically include planning for complete border closure. Even though border closure may not be instituted in time, and can fail, there might still plausible chances of success for well organized island nations. OBJECTIVE: To estimate costs and benefits of complete border closure in response to new pandemic threats, at an initial proof-of-concept level. New Zealand was used as a case-study for an island country. METHODS: An Excel spreadsheet model was developed to estimate costs and benefits. Case-study specific epidemiological data was sourced from past influenza pandemics. Country-specific healthcare cost data, valuation of life, and lost tourism revenue were imputed (with lost trade also in scenario analyses). RESULTS: For a new pandemic equivalent to the 1918 influenza pandemic (albeit with half the mortality rate, “Scenario A”), it was estimated that successful border closure for 26 weeks provided a net societal benefit (e.g., of NZ$11.0 billion, USD$7.3 billion). Even in the face of a complete end to trade, a net benefit was estimated for scenarios where the mortality rate was high (e.g., at 10 times the mortality impact of “Scenario A”, or 2.75% of the country’s population dying) giving a net benefit of NZ$54 billion (USD$36 billion). But for some other pandemic scenarios where trade ceased, border closure resulted in a net negative societal value (e.g., for “Scenario A” times three for 26 weeks of border closure–but not for only 12 weeks of closure when it would still be beneficial). CONCLUSIONS: This “proof-of-concept” work indicates that more detailed cost-benefit analysis of border closure in very severe pandemic situations for some island nations is probably warranted, as this course of action might sometimes be worthwhile from a societal perspective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5473559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54735592017-06-22 Protecting an island nation from extreme pandemic threats: Proof-of-concept around border closure as an intervention Boyd, Matt Baker, Michael G. Mansoor, Osman D. Kvizhinadze, Giorgi Wilson, Nick PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Countries are well advised to prepare for future pandemic risks (e.g., pandemic influenza, novel emerging agents or synthetic bioweapons). These preparations do not typically include planning for complete border closure. Even though border closure may not be instituted in time, and can fail, there might still plausible chances of success for well organized island nations. OBJECTIVE: To estimate costs and benefits of complete border closure in response to new pandemic threats, at an initial proof-of-concept level. New Zealand was used as a case-study for an island country. METHODS: An Excel spreadsheet model was developed to estimate costs and benefits. Case-study specific epidemiological data was sourced from past influenza pandemics. Country-specific healthcare cost data, valuation of life, and lost tourism revenue were imputed (with lost trade also in scenario analyses). RESULTS: For a new pandemic equivalent to the 1918 influenza pandemic (albeit with half the mortality rate, “Scenario A”), it was estimated that successful border closure for 26 weeks provided a net societal benefit (e.g., of NZ$11.0 billion, USD$7.3 billion). Even in the face of a complete end to trade, a net benefit was estimated for scenarios where the mortality rate was high (e.g., at 10 times the mortality impact of “Scenario A”, or 2.75% of the country’s population dying) giving a net benefit of NZ$54 billion (USD$36 billion). But for some other pandemic scenarios where trade ceased, border closure resulted in a net negative societal value (e.g., for “Scenario A” times three for 26 weeks of border closure–but not for only 12 weeks of closure when it would still be beneficial). CONCLUSIONS: This “proof-of-concept” work indicates that more detailed cost-benefit analysis of border closure in very severe pandemic situations for some island nations is probably warranted, as this course of action might sometimes be worthwhile from a societal perspective. Public Library of Science 2017-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5473559/ /pubmed/28622344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178732 Text en © 2017 Boyd et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Boyd, Matt
Baker, Michael G.
Mansoor, Osman D.
Kvizhinadze, Giorgi
Wilson, Nick
Protecting an island nation from extreme pandemic threats: Proof-of-concept around border closure as an intervention
title Protecting an island nation from extreme pandemic threats: Proof-of-concept around border closure as an intervention
title_full Protecting an island nation from extreme pandemic threats: Proof-of-concept around border closure as an intervention
title_fullStr Protecting an island nation from extreme pandemic threats: Proof-of-concept around border closure as an intervention
title_full_unstemmed Protecting an island nation from extreme pandemic threats: Proof-of-concept around border closure as an intervention
title_short Protecting an island nation from extreme pandemic threats: Proof-of-concept around border closure as an intervention
title_sort protecting an island nation from extreme pandemic threats: proof-of-concept around border closure as an intervention
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5473559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28622344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178732
work_keys_str_mv AT boydmatt protectinganislandnationfromextremepandemicthreatsproofofconceptaroundborderclosureasanintervention
AT bakermichaelg protectinganislandnationfromextremepandemicthreatsproofofconceptaroundborderclosureasanintervention
AT mansoorosmand protectinganislandnationfromextremepandemicthreatsproofofconceptaroundborderclosureasanintervention
AT kvizhinadzegiorgi protectinganislandnationfromextremepandemicthreatsproofofconceptaroundborderclosureasanintervention
AT wilsonnick protectinganislandnationfromextremepandemicthreatsproofofconceptaroundborderclosureasanintervention