Cargando…

Translational contributions to tissue specificity in rhythmic and constitutive gene expression

BACKGROUND: The daily gene expression oscillations that underlie mammalian circadian rhythms show striking differences between tissues and involve post-transcriptional regulation. Both aspects remain poorly understood. We have used ribosome profiling to explore the contribution of translation effici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castelo-Szekely, Violeta, Arpat, Alaaddin Bulak, Janich, Peggy, Gatfield, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5473967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28622766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1222-2
_version_ 1783244383648219136
author Castelo-Szekely, Violeta
Arpat, Alaaddin Bulak
Janich, Peggy
Gatfield, David
author_facet Castelo-Szekely, Violeta
Arpat, Alaaddin Bulak
Janich, Peggy
Gatfield, David
author_sort Castelo-Szekely, Violeta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The daily gene expression oscillations that underlie mammalian circadian rhythms show striking differences between tissues and involve post-transcriptional regulation. Both aspects remain poorly understood. We have used ribosome profiling to explore the contribution of translation efficiency to temporal gene expression in kidney and contrasted our findings with liver data available from the same mice. RESULTS: Rhythmic translation of constantly abundant messenger RNAs (mRNAs) affects largely non-overlapping transcript sets with distinct phase clustering in the two organs. Moreover, tissue differences in translation efficiency modulate the timing and amount of protein biosynthesis from rhythmic mRNAs, consistent with organ specificity in clock output gene repertoires and rhythmicity parameters. Our comprehensive datasets provided insights into translational control beyond temporal regulation. Between tissues, many transcripts show differences in translation efficiency, which are, however, of markedly smaller scale than mRNA abundance differences. Tissue-specific changes in translation efficiency are associated with specific transcript features and, intriguingly, globally counteracted and compensated transcript abundance variations, leading to higher similarity at the level of protein biosynthesis between both tissues. CONCLUSIONS: We show that tissue specificity in rhythmic gene expression extends to the translatome and contributes to define the identities, the phases and the expression levels of rhythmic protein biosynthesis. Moreover, translational compensation of transcript abundance divergence leads to overall higher similarity at the level of protein production across organs. The unique resources provided through our study will serve to address fundamental questions of post-transcriptional control and differential gene expression in vivo. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1222-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5473967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54739672017-06-21 Translational contributions to tissue specificity in rhythmic and constitutive gene expression Castelo-Szekely, Violeta Arpat, Alaaddin Bulak Janich, Peggy Gatfield, David Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: The daily gene expression oscillations that underlie mammalian circadian rhythms show striking differences between tissues and involve post-transcriptional regulation. Both aspects remain poorly understood. We have used ribosome profiling to explore the contribution of translation efficiency to temporal gene expression in kidney and contrasted our findings with liver data available from the same mice. RESULTS: Rhythmic translation of constantly abundant messenger RNAs (mRNAs) affects largely non-overlapping transcript sets with distinct phase clustering in the two organs. Moreover, tissue differences in translation efficiency modulate the timing and amount of protein biosynthesis from rhythmic mRNAs, consistent with organ specificity in clock output gene repertoires and rhythmicity parameters. Our comprehensive datasets provided insights into translational control beyond temporal regulation. Between tissues, many transcripts show differences in translation efficiency, which are, however, of markedly smaller scale than mRNA abundance differences. Tissue-specific changes in translation efficiency are associated with specific transcript features and, intriguingly, globally counteracted and compensated transcript abundance variations, leading to higher similarity at the level of protein biosynthesis between both tissues. CONCLUSIONS: We show that tissue specificity in rhythmic gene expression extends to the translatome and contributes to define the identities, the phases and the expression levels of rhythmic protein biosynthesis. Moreover, translational compensation of transcript abundance divergence leads to overall higher similarity at the level of protein production across organs. The unique resources provided through our study will serve to address fundamental questions of post-transcriptional control and differential gene expression in vivo. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1222-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5473967/ /pubmed/28622766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1222-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Castelo-Szekely, Violeta
Arpat, Alaaddin Bulak
Janich, Peggy
Gatfield, David
Translational contributions to tissue specificity in rhythmic and constitutive gene expression
title Translational contributions to tissue specificity in rhythmic and constitutive gene expression
title_full Translational contributions to tissue specificity in rhythmic and constitutive gene expression
title_fullStr Translational contributions to tissue specificity in rhythmic and constitutive gene expression
title_full_unstemmed Translational contributions to tissue specificity in rhythmic and constitutive gene expression
title_short Translational contributions to tissue specificity in rhythmic and constitutive gene expression
title_sort translational contributions to tissue specificity in rhythmic and constitutive gene expression
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5473967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28622766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1222-2
work_keys_str_mv AT casteloszekelyvioleta translationalcontributionstotissuespecificityinrhythmicandconstitutivegeneexpression
AT arpatalaaddinbulak translationalcontributionstotissuespecificityinrhythmicandconstitutivegeneexpression
AT janichpeggy translationalcontributionstotissuespecificityinrhythmicandconstitutivegeneexpression
AT gatfielddavid translationalcontributionstotissuespecificityinrhythmicandconstitutivegeneexpression