Cargando…

The route of infection determines Wolbachia antibacterial protection in Drosophila

Bacterial symbionts are widespread among metazoans and provide a range of beneficial functions. Wolbachia-mediated protection against viral infection has been extensively demonstrated in Drosophila. In mosquitoes that are artificially transinfected with Drosophila melanogaster Wolbachia (wMel), prot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Vanika, Vasanthakrishnan, Radhakrishnan B., Siva-Jothy, Jonathon, Monteith, Katy M., Brown, Sam P., Vale, Pedro F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5474083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28592678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0809
_version_ 1783244404157317120
author Gupta, Vanika
Vasanthakrishnan, Radhakrishnan B.
Siva-Jothy, Jonathon
Monteith, Katy M.
Brown, Sam P.
Vale, Pedro F.
author_facet Gupta, Vanika
Vasanthakrishnan, Radhakrishnan B.
Siva-Jothy, Jonathon
Monteith, Katy M.
Brown, Sam P.
Vale, Pedro F.
author_sort Gupta, Vanika
collection PubMed
description Bacterial symbionts are widespread among metazoans and provide a range of beneficial functions. Wolbachia-mediated protection against viral infection has been extensively demonstrated in Drosophila. In mosquitoes that are artificially transinfected with Drosophila melanogaster Wolbachia (wMel), protection from both viral and bacterial infections has been demonstrated. However, no evidence for Wolbachia-mediated antibacterial protection has been demonstrated in Drosophila to date. Here, we show that the route of infection is key for Wolbachia-mediated antibacterial protection. Drosophila melanogaster carrying Wolbachia showed reduced mortality during enteric—but not systemic—infection with the opportunist pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Wolbachia-mediated protection was more pronounced in male flies and is associated with increased early expression of the antimicrobial peptide Attacin A, and also increased expression of a reactive oxygen species detoxification gene (Gst D8). These results highlight that the route of infection is important for symbiont-mediated protection from infection, that Wolbachia can protect hosts by eliciting a combination of resistance and disease tolerance mechanisms, and that these effects are sexually dimorphic. We discuss the importance of using ecologically relevant routes of infection to gain a better understanding of symbiont-mediated protection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5474083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54740832017-06-19 The route of infection determines Wolbachia antibacterial protection in Drosophila Gupta, Vanika Vasanthakrishnan, Radhakrishnan B. Siva-Jothy, Jonathon Monteith, Katy M. Brown, Sam P. Vale, Pedro F. Proc Biol Sci Development and Physiology Bacterial symbionts are widespread among metazoans and provide a range of beneficial functions. Wolbachia-mediated protection against viral infection has been extensively demonstrated in Drosophila. In mosquitoes that are artificially transinfected with Drosophila melanogaster Wolbachia (wMel), protection from both viral and bacterial infections has been demonstrated. However, no evidence for Wolbachia-mediated antibacterial protection has been demonstrated in Drosophila to date. Here, we show that the route of infection is key for Wolbachia-mediated antibacterial protection. Drosophila melanogaster carrying Wolbachia showed reduced mortality during enteric—but not systemic—infection with the opportunist pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Wolbachia-mediated protection was more pronounced in male flies and is associated with increased early expression of the antimicrobial peptide Attacin A, and also increased expression of a reactive oxygen species detoxification gene (Gst D8). These results highlight that the route of infection is important for symbiont-mediated protection from infection, that Wolbachia can protect hosts by eliciting a combination of resistance and disease tolerance mechanisms, and that these effects are sexually dimorphic. We discuss the importance of using ecologically relevant routes of infection to gain a better understanding of symbiont-mediated protection. The Royal Society 2017-06-14 2017-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5474083/ /pubmed/28592678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0809 Text en © 2017 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Development and Physiology
Gupta, Vanika
Vasanthakrishnan, Radhakrishnan B.
Siva-Jothy, Jonathon
Monteith, Katy M.
Brown, Sam P.
Vale, Pedro F.
The route of infection determines Wolbachia antibacterial protection in Drosophila
title The route of infection determines Wolbachia antibacterial protection in Drosophila
title_full The route of infection determines Wolbachia antibacterial protection in Drosophila
title_fullStr The route of infection determines Wolbachia antibacterial protection in Drosophila
title_full_unstemmed The route of infection determines Wolbachia antibacterial protection in Drosophila
title_short The route of infection determines Wolbachia antibacterial protection in Drosophila
title_sort route of infection determines wolbachia antibacterial protection in drosophila
topic Development and Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5474083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28592678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0809
work_keys_str_mv AT guptavanika therouteofinfectiondetermineswolbachiaantibacterialprotectionindrosophila
AT vasanthakrishnanradhakrishnanb therouteofinfectiondetermineswolbachiaantibacterialprotectionindrosophila
AT sivajothyjonathon therouteofinfectiondetermineswolbachiaantibacterialprotectionindrosophila
AT monteithkatym therouteofinfectiondetermineswolbachiaantibacterialprotectionindrosophila
AT brownsamp therouteofinfectiondetermineswolbachiaantibacterialprotectionindrosophila
AT valepedrof therouteofinfectiondetermineswolbachiaantibacterialprotectionindrosophila
AT guptavanika routeofinfectiondetermineswolbachiaantibacterialprotectionindrosophila
AT vasanthakrishnanradhakrishnanb routeofinfectiondetermineswolbachiaantibacterialprotectionindrosophila
AT sivajothyjonathon routeofinfectiondetermineswolbachiaantibacterialprotectionindrosophila
AT monteithkatym routeofinfectiondetermineswolbachiaantibacterialprotectionindrosophila
AT brownsamp routeofinfectiondetermineswolbachiaantibacterialprotectionindrosophila
AT valepedrof routeofinfectiondetermineswolbachiaantibacterialprotectionindrosophila