Cargando…
A comparative evaluation: Oral leukoplakia surgical management using diode laser, CO2 laser, and cryosurgery
BACKGROUND: The comparatively evaluate the three surgical treatment modalities namely cryosurgery, diode and CO2 laser surgery in terms of healing outcomes on the day of surgery, first and second week post operatively and recurrence at the end of 18 months was assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5474334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28638555 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.53602 |
_version_ | 1783244427946360832 |
---|---|
author | Natekar, Madhukar Raghuveer, Hosahallli-Puttaiah Rayapati, Dilip-Kumar Shobha, Eshwara-Singh Prashanth, Nagesh-Tavane Rangan, Vinod Panicker, Archana G |
author_facet | Natekar, Madhukar Raghuveer, Hosahallli-Puttaiah Rayapati, Dilip-Kumar Shobha, Eshwara-Singh Prashanth, Nagesh-Tavane Rangan, Vinod Panicker, Archana G |
author_sort | Natekar, Madhukar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The comparatively evaluate the three surgical treatment modalities namely cryosurgery, diode and CO2 laser surgery in terms of healing outcomes on the day of surgery, first and second week post operatively and recurrence at the end of 18 months was assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty selected patients were divided randomly into three groups. Each group comprising of ten patients were subjected to one of the three modalities of treatment namely cryosurgery, diode laser or CO2 laser surgery for ablation of OL. Obtained data was analyzed using mainly using Chi-square and Anova tests. RESULTS: Study showed statistical significant differences (p > 0.05) for evaluation parameters like pain, edema and scar. The parameters like infection, recurrence, bleeding showed no statistical significance. Pain was significantly higher in CO2 laser surgery group as compared with diode laser group. There was no recurrence observed at the end of the 6 months follow up period in all the three study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Observations from the study highlights that all three surgical modalities used in this study were effective for treatment of OL, and the overall summation of the results of the study showed that laser therapy (CO2 and Diode) seems to offer better clinically significant results than cryotherapy. Key words:Oral premalignant lesion, leukoplakia, cryosurgery, CO2 laser surgery, diode laser surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5474334 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54743342017-06-21 A comparative evaluation: Oral leukoplakia surgical management using diode laser, CO2 laser, and cryosurgery Natekar, Madhukar Raghuveer, Hosahallli-Puttaiah Rayapati, Dilip-Kumar Shobha, Eshwara-Singh Prashanth, Nagesh-Tavane Rangan, Vinod Panicker, Archana G J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: The comparatively evaluate the three surgical treatment modalities namely cryosurgery, diode and CO2 laser surgery in terms of healing outcomes on the day of surgery, first and second week post operatively and recurrence at the end of 18 months was assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty selected patients were divided randomly into three groups. Each group comprising of ten patients were subjected to one of the three modalities of treatment namely cryosurgery, diode laser or CO2 laser surgery for ablation of OL. Obtained data was analyzed using mainly using Chi-square and Anova tests. RESULTS: Study showed statistical significant differences (p > 0.05) for evaluation parameters like pain, edema and scar. The parameters like infection, recurrence, bleeding showed no statistical significance. Pain was significantly higher in CO2 laser surgery group as compared with diode laser group. There was no recurrence observed at the end of the 6 months follow up period in all the three study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Observations from the study highlights that all three surgical modalities used in this study were effective for treatment of OL, and the overall summation of the results of the study showed that laser therapy (CO2 and Diode) seems to offer better clinically significant results than cryotherapy. Key words:Oral premalignant lesion, leukoplakia, cryosurgery, CO2 laser surgery, diode laser surgery. Medicina Oral S.L. 2017-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5474334/ /pubmed/28638555 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.53602 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Natekar, Madhukar Raghuveer, Hosahallli-Puttaiah Rayapati, Dilip-Kumar Shobha, Eshwara-Singh Prashanth, Nagesh-Tavane Rangan, Vinod Panicker, Archana G A comparative evaluation: Oral leukoplakia surgical management using diode laser, CO2 laser, and cryosurgery |
title | A comparative evaluation: Oral leukoplakia surgical management
using diode laser, CO2 laser, and cryosurgery |
title_full | A comparative evaluation: Oral leukoplakia surgical management
using diode laser, CO2 laser, and cryosurgery |
title_fullStr | A comparative evaluation: Oral leukoplakia surgical management
using diode laser, CO2 laser, and cryosurgery |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative evaluation: Oral leukoplakia surgical management
using diode laser, CO2 laser, and cryosurgery |
title_short | A comparative evaluation: Oral leukoplakia surgical management
using diode laser, CO2 laser, and cryosurgery |
title_sort | comparative evaluation: oral leukoplakia surgical management
using diode laser, co2 laser, and cryosurgery |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5474334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28638555 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.53602 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT natekarmadhukar acomparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery AT raghuveerhosahallliputtaiah acomparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery AT rayapatidilipkumar acomparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery AT shobhaeshwarasingh acomparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery AT prashanthnageshtavane acomparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery AT ranganvinod acomparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery AT panickerarchanag acomparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery AT natekarmadhukar comparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery AT raghuveerhosahallliputtaiah comparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery AT rayapatidilipkumar comparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery AT shobhaeshwarasingh comparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery AT prashanthnageshtavane comparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery AT ranganvinod comparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery AT panickerarchanag comparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery |