Cargando…

A comparative evaluation: Oral leukoplakia surgical management using diode laser, CO2 laser, and cryosurgery

BACKGROUND: The comparatively evaluate the three surgical treatment modalities namely cryosurgery, diode and CO2 laser surgery in terms of healing outcomes on the day of surgery, first and second week post operatively and recurrence at the end of 18 months was assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Natekar, Madhukar, Raghuveer, Hosahallli-Puttaiah, Rayapati, Dilip-Kumar, Shobha, Eshwara-Singh, Prashanth, Nagesh-Tavane, Rangan, Vinod, Panicker, Archana G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5474334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28638555
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.53602
_version_ 1783244427946360832
author Natekar, Madhukar
Raghuveer, Hosahallli-Puttaiah
Rayapati, Dilip-Kumar
Shobha, Eshwara-Singh
Prashanth, Nagesh-Tavane
Rangan, Vinod
Panicker, Archana G
author_facet Natekar, Madhukar
Raghuveer, Hosahallli-Puttaiah
Rayapati, Dilip-Kumar
Shobha, Eshwara-Singh
Prashanth, Nagesh-Tavane
Rangan, Vinod
Panicker, Archana G
author_sort Natekar, Madhukar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The comparatively evaluate the three surgical treatment modalities namely cryosurgery, diode and CO2 laser surgery in terms of healing outcomes on the day of surgery, first and second week post operatively and recurrence at the end of 18 months was assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty selected patients were divided randomly into three groups. Each group comprising of ten patients were subjected to one of the three modalities of treatment namely cryosurgery, diode laser or CO2 laser surgery for ablation of OL. Obtained data was analyzed using mainly using Chi-square and Anova tests. RESULTS: Study showed statistical significant differences (p > 0.05) for evaluation parameters like pain, edema and scar. The parameters like infection, recurrence, bleeding showed no statistical significance. Pain was significantly higher in CO2 laser surgery group as compared with diode laser group. There was no recurrence observed at the end of the 6 months follow up period in all the three study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Observations from the study highlights that all three surgical modalities used in this study were effective for treatment of OL, and the overall summation of the results of the study showed that laser therapy (CO2 and Diode) seems to offer better clinically significant results than cryotherapy. Key words:Oral premalignant lesion, leukoplakia, cryosurgery, CO2 laser surgery, diode laser surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5474334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54743342017-06-21 A comparative evaluation: Oral leukoplakia surgical management using diode laser, CO2 laser, and cryosurgery Natekar, Madhukar Raghuveer, Hosahallli-Puttaiah Rayapati, Dilip-Kumar Shobha, Eshwara-Singh Prashanth, Nagesh-Tavane Rangan, Vinod Panicker, Archana G J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: The comparatively evaluate the three surgical treatment modalities namely cryosurgery, diode and CO2 laser surgery in terms of healing outcomes on the day of surgery, first and second week post operatively and recurrence at the end of 18 months was assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty selected patients were divided randomly into three groups. Each group comprising of ten patients were subjected to one of the three modalities of treatment namely cryosurgery, diode laser or CO2 laser surgery for ablation of OL. Obtained data was analyzed using mainly using Chi-square and Anova tests. RESULTS: Study showed statistical significant differences (p > 0.05) for evaluation parameters like pain, edema and scar. The parameters like infection, recurrence, bleeding showed no statistical significance. Pain was significantly higher in CO2 laser surgery group as compared with diode laser group. There was no recurrence observed at the end of the 6 months follow up period in all the three study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Observations from the study highlights that all three surgical modalities used in this study were effective for treatment of OL, and the overall summation of the results of the study showed that laser therapy (CO2 and Diode) seems to offer better clinically significant results than cryotherapy. Key words:Oral premalignant lesion, leukoplakia, cryosurgery, CO2 laser surgery, diode laser surgery. Medicina Oral S.L. 2017-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5474334/ /pubmed/28638555 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.53602 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Natekar, Madhukar
Raghuveer, Hosahallli-Puttaiah
Rayapati, Dilip-Kumar
Shobha, Eshwara-Singh
Prashanth, Nagesh-Tavane
Rangan, Vinod
Panicker, Archana G
A comparative evaluation: Oral leukoplakia surgical management using diode laser, CO2 laser, and cryosurgery
title A comparative evaluation: Oral leukoplakia surgical management using diode laser, CO2 laser, and cryosurgery
title_full A comparative evaluation: Oral leukoplakia surgical management using diode laser, CO2 laser, and cryosurgery
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation: Oral leukoplakia surgical management using diode laser, CO2 laser, and cryosurgery
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation: Oral leukoplakia surgical management using diode laser, CO2 laser, and cryosurgery
title_short A comparative evaluation: Oral leukoplakia surgical management using diode laser, CO2 laser, and cryosurgery
title_sort comparative evaluation: oral leukoplakia surgical management using diode laser, co2 laser, and cryosurgery
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5474334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28638555
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.53602
work_keys_str_mv AT natekarmadhukar acomparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery
AT raghuveerhosahallliputtaiah acomparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery
AT rayapatidilipkumar acomparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery
AT shobhaeshwarasingh acomparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery
AT prashanthnageshtavane acomparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery
AT ranganvinod acomparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery
AT panickerarchanag acomparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery
AT natekarmadhukar comparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery
AT raghuveerhosahallliputtaiah comparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery
AT rayapatidilipkumar comparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery
AT shobhaeshwarasingh comparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery
AT prashanthnageshtavane comparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery
AT ranganvinod comparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery
AT panickerarchanag comparativeevaluationoralleukoplakiasurgicalmanagementusingdiodelaserco2laserandcryosurgery