Cargando…

Multicenter Phase 2 Study about the Safety of No Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Use in Low-Risk Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma (KSWEET-01 Study)

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown a lower risk of surgical site infections (SSI) after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared to open surgery. This is a phase 2 study aiming to determine the incidence of SSI after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy without using antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP). M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeong, Oh, Jung, Mi Ran, Ryu, Seong Yeob, Park, Young-Kyu, Kim, Min Chan, Kim, Ki Han, Ryu, Seung Wan, Kwon, In Gyu, Son, Young Gil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5474554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28656047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8928353
_version_ 1783244468250476544
author Jeong, Oh
Jung, Mi Ran
Ryu, Seong Yeob
Park, Young-Kyu
Kim, Min Chan
Kim, Ki Han
Ryu, Seung Wan
Kwon, In Gyu
Son, Young Gil
author_facet Jeong, Oh
Jung, Mi Ran
Ryu, Seong Yeob
Park, Young-Kyu
Kim, Min Chan
Kim, Ki Han
Ryu, Seung Wan
Kwon, In Gyu
Son, Young Gil
author_sort Jeong, Oh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown a lower risk of surgical site infections (SSI) after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared to open surgery. This is a phase 2 study aiming to determine the incidence of SSI after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy without using antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP). METHODS: cT1N0 gastric cancers that were subject to laparoscopic distal gastrectomy were enrolled. Based on the unacceptable SSI incidence of ≥12.5% and the target SSI incidence of ≤5%, 105 patients were enrolled with an α of 0.05 and a power of 80% (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02200315). RESULTS: In intention-to-treat analysis, patients did not reach the target SSI rate (12.4%, 95% confidence  interval = 6.8%–19.8%). Of patients, 44 patients had a protocol violation, such as extended lymph node dissection (LND) or inappropriate nonpharmacological SSI prevention measures. Per-protocol analysis excluding these patients (n = 61) showed a SSI rate of 4.9%, which was within the target SSI range. Multivariate analysis revealed that extracorporeal anastomosis and extended LND were independent risk factors for SSI. CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to reach the target SSI rate without using AMP. However, per-protocol analysis suggests that no AMP might be feasible when limited LND and adequate SSI prevention measures were performed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5474554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54745542017-06-27 Multicenter Phase 2 Study about the Safety of No Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Use in Low-Risk Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma (KSWEET-01 Study) Jeong, Oh Jung, Mi Ran Ryu, Seong Yeob Park, Young-Kyu Kim, Min Chan Kim, Ki Han Ryu, Seung Wan Kwon, In Gyu Son, Young Gil Gastroenterol Res Pract Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown a lower risk of surgical site infections (SSI) after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared to open surgery. This is a phase 2 study aiming to determine the incidence of SSI after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy without using antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP). METHODS: cT1N0 gastric cancers that were subject to laparoscopic distal gastrectomy were enrolled. Based on the unacceptable SSI incidence of ≥12.5% and the target SSI incidence of ≤5%, 105 patients were enrolled with an α of 0.05 and a power of 80% (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02200315). RESULTS: In intention-to-treat analysis, patients did not reach the target SSI rate (12.4%, 95% confidence  interval = 6.8%–19.8%). Of patients, 44 patients had a protocol violation, such as extended lymph node dissection (LND) or inappropriate nonpharmacological SSI prevention measures. Per-protocol analysis excluding these patients (n = 61) showed a SSI rate of 4.9%, which was within the target SSI range. Multivariate analysis revealed that extracorporeal anastomosis and extended LND were independent risk factors for SSI. CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to reach the target SSI rate without using AMP. However, per-protocol analysis suggests that no AMP might be feasible when limited LND and adequate SSI prevention measures were performed. Hindawi 2017 2017-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5474554/ /pubmed/28656047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8928353 Text en Copyright © 2017 Oh Jeong et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Jeong, Oh
Jung, Mi Ran
Ryu, Seong Yeob
Park, Young-Kyu
Kim, Min Chan
Kim, Ki Han
Ryu, Seung Wan
Kwon, In Gyu
Son, Young Gil
Multicenter Phase 2 Study about the Safety of No Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Use in Low-Risk Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma (KSWEET-01 Study)
title Multicenter Phase 2 Study about the Safety of No Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Use in Low-Risk Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma (KSWEET-01 Study)
title_full Multicenter Phase 2 Study about the Safety of No Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Use in Low-Risk Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma (KSWEET-01 Study)
title_fullStr Multicenter Phase 2 Study about the Safety of No Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Use in Low-Risk Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma (KSWEET-01 Study)
title_full_unstemmed Multicenter Phase 2 Study about the Safety of No Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Use in Low-Risk Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma (KSWEET-01 Study)
title_short Multicenter Phase 2 Study about the Safety of No Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Use in Low-Risk Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma (KSWEET-01 Study)
title_sort multicenter phase 2 study about the safety of no antimicrobial prophylaxis use in low-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma (ksweet-01 study)
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5474554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28656047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8928353
work_keys_str_mv AT jeongoh multicenterphase2studyaboutthesafetyofnoantimicrobialprophylaxisuseinlowriskpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicdistalgastrectomyforgastriccarcinomaksweet01study
AT jungmiran multicenterphase2studyaboutthesafetyofnoantimicrobialprophylaxisuseinlowriskpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicdistalgastrectomyforgastriccarcinomaksweet01study
AT ryuseongyeob multicenterphase2studyaboutthesafetyofnoantimicrobialprophylaxisuseinlowriskpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicdistalgastrectomyforgastriccarcinomaksweet01study
AT parkyoungkyu multicenterphase2studyaboutthesafetyofnoantimicrobialprophylaxisuseinlowriskpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicdistalgastrectomyforgastriccarcinomaksweet01study
AT kimminchan multicenterphase2studyaboutthesafetyofnoantimicrobialprophylaxisuseinlowriskpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicdistalgastrectomyforgastriccarcinomaksweet01study
AT kimkihan multicenterphase2studyaboutthesafetyofnoantimicrobialprophylaxisuseinlowriskpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicdistalgastrectomyforgastriccarcinomaksweet01study
AT ryuseungwan multicenterphase2studyaboutthesafetyofnoantimicrobialprophylaxisuseinlowriskpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicdistalgastrectomyforgastriccarcinomaksweet01study
AT kwoningyu multicenterphase2studyaboutthesafetyofnoantimicrobialprophylaxisuseinlowriskpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicdistalgastrectomyforgastriccarcinomaksweet01study
AT sonyounggil multicenterphase2studyaboutthesafetyofnoantimicrobialprophylaxisuseinlowriskpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicdistalgastrectomyforgastriccarcinomaksweet01study