Cargando…
Infection Prophylaxis for Breast Implant Surgery: Could We Do Better?
Objective: Infective complications following breast implant surgery may result in implant removal. This causes patient distress and is costly to treat. A range of precautions is undertaken at the time of surgery to reduce infection, with varying levels of supporting evidence. This study aimed to det...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Open Science Company, LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5475307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28663774 |
_version_ | 1783244537975537664 |
---|---|
author | Henderson, Julia R. Kandola, Sandhir Hignett, Susan P. Teasdale, Rebecca L. Topps, Ashley R. Pennick, Mandana Hwang, Meiju Barnes, Nicola Kirwan, Cliona C. |
author_facet | Henderson, Julia R. Kandola, Sandhir Hignett, Susan P. Teasdale, Rebecca L. Topps, Ashley R. Pennick, Mandana Hwang, Meiju Barnes, Nicola Kirwan, Cliona C. |
author_sort | Henderson, Julia R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Infective complications following breast implant surgery may result in implant removal. This causes patient distress and is costly to treat. A range of precautions is undertaken at the time of surgery to reduce infection, with varying levels of supporting evidence. This study aimed to determine how frequently and consistently infection prevention precautions are used during breast implant surgery. Methods: Multicenter observational study of surgical practice with real-time data collection during breast implant surgery. Results: From 7 NHS breast units, 121 implant procedures were assessed in 94 patients under the care of 22 consultant surgeons. The commonest procedure was immediate reconstruction (58%; 70/121). All patients were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (but not methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus) screened. Antibiotics were given at surgery in all cases; 92% (85/94) received postoperative antibiotics. Other precautions included closed glove technique (67%; 63/94), door signs to reduce theater traffic (72%; 68/94), glove changing prior to implant handling (98%; 119/121), laminar air flow theaters (55%; 52/94), disposable drapes (94%; 88/94) and gowns (74%; 70/94), and cavity washing (89%; 108/121). Among the 14 consultants evaluated on more than 1 procedure (range, 2-22; median = 5), only 1 consistently used exactly the same precautions when siting an implant. Conclusion: Despite national guidance, infection prevention measures are not applied consistently during breast implant surgery, with variability between surgeons and within individual surgeon's practice. The introduction of an infection prevention checklist for all breast implant procedures could improve the reliability with which these precautions are undertaken. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5475307 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Open Science Company, LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54753072017-06-29 Infection Prophylaxis for Breast Implant Surgery: Could We Do Better? Henderson, Julia R. Kandola, Sandhir Hignett, Susan P. Teasdale, Rebecca L. Topps, Ashley R. Pennick, Mandana Hwang, Meiju Barnes, Nicola Kirwan, Cliona C. Eplasty Journal Article Objective: Infective complications following breast implant surgery may result in implant removal. This causes patient distress and is costly to treat. A range of precautions is undertaken at the time of surgery to reduce infection, with varying levels of supporting evidence. This study aimed to determine how frequently and consistently infection prevention precautions are used during breast implant surgery. Methods: Multicenter observational study of surgical practice with real-time data collection during breast implant surgery. Results: From 7 NHS breast units, 121 implant procedures were assessed in 94 patients under the care of 22 consultant surgeons. The commonest procedure was immediate reconstruction (58%; 70/121). All patients were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (but not methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus) screened. Antibiotics were given at surgery in all cases; 92% (85/94) received postoperative antibiotics. Other precautions included closed glove technique (67%; 63/94), door signs to reduce theater traffic (72%; 68/94), glove changing prior to implant handling (98%; 119/121), laminar air flow theaters (55%; 52/94), disposable drapes (94%; 88/94) and gowns (74%; 70/94), and cavity washing (89%; 108/121). Among the 14 consultants evaluated on more than 1 procedure (range, 2-22; median = 5), only 1 consistently used exactly the same precautions when siting an implant. Conclusion: Despite national guidance, infection prevention measures are not applied consistently during breast implant surgery, with variability between surgeons and within individual surgeon's practice. The introduction of an infection prevention checklist for all breast implant procedures could improve the reliability with which these precautions are undertaken. Open Science Company, LLC 2017-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5475307/ /pubmed/28663774 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article whereby the authors retain copyright of the work. The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Journal Article Henderson, Julia R. Kandola, Sandhir Hignett, Susan P. Teasdale, Rebecca L. Topps, Ashley R. Pennick, Mandana Hwang, Meiju Barnes, Nicola Kirwan, Cliona C. Infection Prophylaxis for Breast Implant Surgery: Could We Do Better? |
title | Infection Prophylaxis for Breast Implant Surgery: Could We Do Better? |
title_full | Infection Prophylaxis for Breast Implant Surgery: Could We Do Better? |
title_fullStr | Infection Prophylaxis for Breast Implant Surgery: Could We Do Better? |
title_full_unstemmed | Infection Prophylaxis for Breast Implant Surgery: Could We Do Better? |
title_short | Infection Prophylaxis for Breast Implant Surgery: Could We Do Better? |
title_sort | infection prophylaxis for breast implant surgery: could we do better? |
topic | Journal Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5475307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28663774 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hendersonjuliar infectionprophylaxisforbreastimplantsurgerycouldwedobetter AT kandolasandhir infectionprophylaxisforbreastimplantsurgerycouldwedobetter AT hignettsusanp infectionprophylaxisforbreastimplantsurgerycouldwedobetter AT teasdalerebeccal infectionprophylaxisforbreastimplantsurgerycouldwedobetter AT toppsashleyr infectionprophylaxisforbreastimplantsurgerycouldwedobetter AT pennickmandana infectionprophylaxisforbreastimplantsurgerycouldwedobetter AT hwangmeiju infectionprophylaxisforbreastimplantsurgerycouldwedobetter AT barnesnicola infectionprophylaxisforbreastimplantsurgerycouldwedobetter AT kirwanclionac infectionprophylaxisforbreastimplantsurgerycouldwedobetter |