Cargando…

Infection Prophylaxis for Breast Implant Surgery: Could We Do Better?

Objective: Infective complications following breast implant surgery may result in implant removal. This causes patient distress and is costly to treat. A range of precautions is undertaken at the time of surgery to reduce infection, with varying levels of supporting evidence. This study aimed to det...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henderson, Julia R., Kandola, Sandhir, Hignett, Susan P., Teasdale, Rebecca L., Topps, Ashley R., Pennick, Mandana, Hwang, Meiju, Barnes, Nicola, Kirwan, Cliona C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Open Science Company, LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5475307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28663774
_version_ 1783244537975537664
author Henderson, Julia R.
Kandola, Sandhir
Hignett, Susan P.
Teasdale, Rebecca L.
Topps, Ashley R.
Pennick, Mandana
Hwang, Meiju
Barnes, Nicola
Kirwan, Cliona C.
author_facet Henderson, Julia R.
Kandola, Sandhir
Hignett, Susan P.
Teasdale, Rebecca L.
Topps, Ashley R.
Pennick, Mandana
Hwang, Meiju
Barnes, Nicola
Kirwan, Cliona C.
author_sort Henderson, Julia R.
collection PubMed
description Objective: Infective complications following breast implant surgery may result in implant removal. This causes patient distress and is costly to treat. A range of precautions is undertaken at the time of surgery to reduce infection, with varying levels of supporting evidence. This study aimed to determine how frequently and consistently infection prevention precautions are used during breast implant surgery. Methods: Multicenter observational study of surgical practice with real-time data collection during breast implant surgery. Results: From 7 NHS breast units, 121 implant procedures were assessed in 94 patients under the care of 22 consultant surgeons. The commonest procedure was immediate reconstruction (58%; 70/121). All patients were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (but not methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus) screened. Antibiotics were given at surgery in all cases; 92% (85/94) received postoperative antibiotics. Other precautions included closed glove technique (67%; 63/94), door signs to reduce theater traffic (72%; 68/94), glove changing prior to implant handling (98%; 119/121), laminar air flow theaters (55%; 52/94), disposable drapes (94%; 88/94) and gowns (74%; 70/94), and cavity washing (89%; 108/121). Among the 14 consultants evaluated on more than 1 procedure (range, 2-22; median = 5), only 1 consistently used exactly the same precautions when siting an implant. Conclusion: Despite national guidance, infection prevention measures are not applied consistently during breast implant surgery, with variability between surgeons and within individual surgeon's practice. The introduction of an infection prevention checklist for all breast implant procedures could improve the reliability with which these precautions are undertaken.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5475307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Open Science Company, LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54753072017-06-29 Infection Prophylaxis for Breast Implant Surgery: Could We Do Better? Henderson, Julia R. Kandola, Sandhir Hignett, Susan P. Teasdale, Rebecca L. Topps, Ashley R. Pennick, Mandana Hwang, Meiju Barnes, Nicola Kirwan, Cliona C. Eplasty Journal Article Objective: Infective complications following breast implant surgery may result in implant removal. This causes patient distress and is costly to treat. A range of precautions is undertaken at the time of surgery to reduce infection, with varying levels of supporting evidence. This study aimed to determine how frequently and consistently infection prevention precautions are used during breast implant surgery. Methods: Multicenter observational study of surgical practice with real-time data collection during breast implant surgery. Results: From 7 NHS breast units, 121 implant procedures were assessed in 94 patients under the care of 22 consultant surgeons. The commonest procedure was immediate reconstruction (58%; 70/121). All patients were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (but not methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus) screened. Antibiotics were given at surgery in all cases; 92% (85/94) received postoperative antibiotics. Other precautions included closed glove technique (67%; 63/94), door signs to reduce theater traffic (72%; 68/94), glove changing prior to implant handling (98%; 119/121), laminar air flow theaters (55%; 52/94), disposable drapes (94%; 88/94) and gowns (74%; 70/94), and cavity washing (89%; 108/121). Among the 14 consultants evaluated on more than 1 procedure (range, 2-22; median = 5), only 1 consistently used exactly the same precautions when siting an implant. Conclusion: Despite national guidance, infection prevention measures are not applied consistently during breast implant surgery, with variability between surgeons and within individual surgeon's practice. The introduction of an infection prevention checklist for all breast implant procedures could improve the reliability with which these precautions are undertaken. Open Science Company, LLC 2017-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5475307/ /pubmed/28663774 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article whereby the authors retain copyright of the work. The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Journal Article
Henderson, Julia R.
Kandola, Sandhir
Hignett, Susan P.
Teasdale, Rebecca L.
Topps, Ashley R.
Pennick, Mandana
Hwang, Meiju
Barnes, Nicola
Kirwan, Cliona C.
Infection Prophylaxis for Breast Implant Surgery: Could We Do Better?
title Infection Prophylaxis for Breast Implant Surgery: Could We Do Better?
title_full Infection Prophylaxis for Breast Implant Surgery: Could We Do Better?
title_fullStr Infection Prophylaxis for Breast Implant Surgery: Could We Do Better?
title_full_unstemmed Infection Prophylaxis for Breast Implant Surgery: Could We Do Better?
title_short Infection Prophylaxis for Breast Implant Surgery: Could We Do Better?
title_sort infection prophylaxis for breast implant surgery: could we do better?
topic Journal Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5475307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28663774
work_keys_str_mv AT hendersonjuliar infectionprophylaxisforbreastimplantsurgerycouldwedobetter
AT kandolasandhir infectionprophylaxisforbreastimplantsurgerycouldwedobetter
AT hignettsusanp infectionprophylaxisforbreastimplantsurgerycouldwedobetter
AT teasdalerebeccal infectionprophylaxisforbreastimplantsurgerycouldwedobetter
AT toppsashleyr infectionprophylaxisforbreastimplantsurgerycouldwedobetter
AT pennickmandana infectionprophylaxisforbreastimplantsurgerycouldwedobetter
AT hwangmeiju infectionprophylaxisforbreastimplantsurgerycouldwedobetter
AT barnesnicola infectionprophylaxisforbreastimplantsurgerycouldwedobetter
AT kirwanclionac infectionprophylaxisforbreastimplantsurgerycouldwedobetter