Cargando…

Initiating a participatory action research process in the Agincourt health and socio–demographic surveillance site

BACKGROUND: Despite progressive health policy, disease burdens in South Africa remain patterned by deeply entrenched social inequalities. Accounting for the relationships between context, health and risk can provide important information for equitable service delivery. The aims of the research were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wariri, Oghenebrume, D’Ambruoso, Lucia, Twine, Rhian, Ngobeni, Sizzy, van der Merwe, Maria, Spies, Barry, Kahn, Kathleen, Tollman, Stephen, Wagner, Ryan G, Byass, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Edinburgh University Global Health Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5475314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28685035
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.07.010413
_version_ 1783244539685765120
author Wariri, Oghenebrume
D’Ambruoso, Lucia
Twine, Rhian
Ngobeni, Sizzy
van der Merwe, Maria
Spies, Barry
Kahn, Kathleen
Tollman, Stephen
Wagner, Ryan G
Byass, Peter
author_facet Wariri, Oghenebrume
D’Ambruoso, Lucia
Twine, Rhian
Ngobeni, Sizzy
van der Merwe, Maria
Spies, Barry
Kahn, Kathleen
Tollman, Stephen
Wagner, Ryan G
Byass, Peter
author_sort Wariri, Oghenebrume
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite progressive health policy, disease burdens in South Africa remain patterned by deeply entrenched social inequalities. Accounting for the relationships between context, health and risk can provide important information for equitable service delivery. The aims of the research were to initiate a participatory research process with communities in a low income setting and produce evidence of practical relevance. METHODS: We initiated a participatory action research (PAR) process in the Agincourt health and socio–demographic surveillance site (HDSS) in rural north–east South Africa. Three village–based discussion groups were convened and consulted about conditions to examine, one of which was under–5 mortality. A series of discussions followed in which routine HDSS data were presented and participants’ subjective perspectives were elicited and systematized into collective forms of knowledge using ranking, diagramming and participatory photography. The process concluded with a priority setting exercise. Visual and narrative data were thematically analyzed to complement the participants’ analysis. RESULTS: A range of social and structural root causes of under–5 mortality were identified: poverty, unemployment, inadequate housing, unsafe environments and shortages of clean water. Despite these constraints, single mothers were often viewed as negligent. A series of mid–level contributory factors in clinics were also identified: overcrowding, poor staffing, delays in treatment and shortages of medications. In a similar sense, pronounced blame and negativity were directed toward clinic nurses in spite of the systems constraints identified. Actions to address these issues were prioritized as: expanding clinics, improving accountability and responsiveness of health workers, improving employment, providing clean water, and expanding community engagement for health promotion. CONCLUSIONS: We initiated a PAR process to gain local knowledge and prioritize actions. The process was acceptable to those involved, and there was willingness and commitment to continue. The study provided a basis from which to gain support to develop fuller forms of participatory research in this setting. The next steps are to build deeper involvement of participants in the process, expand to include the perspectives of those most marginalized, and engage in the health system at different levels to move toward an ongoing process of action and learning from action.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5475314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Edinburgh University Global Health Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54753142017-07-06 Initiating a participatory action research process in the Agincourt health and socio–demographic surveillance site Wariri, Oghenebrume D’Ambruoso, Lucia Twine, Rhian Ngobeni, Sizzy van der Merwe, Maria Spies, Barry Kahn, Kathleen Tollman, Stephen Wagner, Ryan G Byass, Peter J Glob Health Articles BACKGROUND: Despite progressive health policy, disease burdens in South Africa remain patterned by deeply entrenched social inequalities. Accounting for the relationships between context, health and risk can provide important information for equitable service delivery. The aims of the research were to initiate a participatory research process with communities in a low income setting and produce evidence of practical relevance. METHODS: We initiated a participatory action research (PAR) process in the Agincourt health and socio–demographic surveillance site (HDSS) in rural north–east South Africa. Three village–based discussion groups were convened and consulted about conditions to examine, one of which was under–5 mortality. A series of discussions followed in which routine HDSS data were presented and participants’ subjective perspectives were elicited and systematized into collective forms of knowledge using ranking, diagramming and participatory photography. The process concluded with a priority setting exercise. Visual and narrative data were thematically analyzed to complement the participants’ analysis. RESULTS: A range of social and structural root causes of under–5 mortality were identified: poverty, unemployment, inadequate housing, unsafe environments and shortages of clean water. Despite these constraints, single mothers were often viewed as negligent. A series of mid–level contributory factors in clinics were also identified: overcrowding, poor staffing, delays in treatment and shortages of medications. In a similar sense, pronounced blame and negativity were directed toward clinic nurses in spite of the systems constraints identified. Actions to address these issues were prioritized as: expanding clinics, improving accountability and responsiveness of health workers, improving employment, providing clean water, and expanding community engagement for health promotion. CONCLUSIONS: We initiated a PAR process to gain local knowledge and prioritize actions. The process was acceptable to those involved, and there was willingness and commitment to continue. The study provided a basis from which to gain support to develop fuller forms of participatory research in this setting. The next steps are to build deeper involvement of participants in the process, expand to include the perspectives of those most marginalized, and engage in the health system at different levels to move toward an ongoing process of action and learning from action. Edinburgh University Global Health Society 2017-06 2017-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5475314/ /pubmed/28685035 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.07.010413 Text en Copyright © 2017 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Articles
Wariri, Oghenebrume
D’Ambruoso, Lucia
Twine, Rhian
Ngobeni, Sizzy
van der Merwe, Maria
Spies, Barry
Kahn, Kathleen
Tollman, Stephen
Wagner, Ryan G
Byass, Peter
Initiating a participatory action research process in the Agincourt health and socio–demographic surveillance site
title Initiating a participatory action research process in the Agincourt health and socio–demographic surveillance site
title_full Initiating a participatory action research process in the Agincourt health and socio–demographic surveillance site
title_fullStr Initiating a participatory action research process in the Agincourt health and socio–demographic surveillance site
title_full_unstemmed Initiating a participatory action research process in the Agincourt health and socio–demographic surveillance site
title_short Initiating a participatory action research process in the Agincourt health and socio–demographic surveillance site
title_sort initiating a participatory action research process in the agincourt health and socio–demographic surveillance site
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5475314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28685035
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.07.010413
work_keys_str_mv AT waririoghenebrume initiatingaparticipatoryactionresearchprocessintheagincourthealthandsociodemographicsurveillancesite
AT dambruosolucia initiatingaparticipatoryactionresearchprocessintheagincourthealthandsociodemographicsurveillancesite
AT twinerhian initiatingaparticipatoryactionresearchprocessintheagincourthealthandsociodemographicsurveillancesite
AT ngobenisizzy initiatingaparticipatoryactionresearchprocessintheagincourthealthandsociodemographicsurveillancesite
AT vandermerwemaria initiatingaparticipatoryactionresearchprocessintheagincourthealthandsociodemographicsurveillancesite
AT spiesbarry initiatingaparticipatoryactionresearchprocessintheagincourthealthandsociodemographicsurveillancesite
AT kahnkathleen initiatingaparticipatoryactionresearchprocessintheagincourthealthandsociodemographicsurveillancesite
AT tollmanstephen initiatingaparticipatoryactionresearchprocessintheagincourthealthandsociodemographicsurveillancesite
AT wagnerryang initiatingaparticipatoryactionresearchprocessintheagincourthealthandsociodemographicsurveillancesite
AT byasspeter initiatingaparticipatoryactionresearchprocessintheagincourthealthandsociodemographicsurveillancesite