Cargando…

A scoping review of intimate partner violence assistance programmes within health care settings

Background: The lifetime prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) for women presenting to health care settings is estimated to be 38–59%. With the goal of providing help to victims of abuse, numerous IPV assistance programmes have been developed and evaluated across multiple health care setting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sprague, Sheila, Scott, Taryn, Garibaldi, Alisha, Bzovsky, Sofia, Slobogean, Gerard P., McKay, Paula, Spurr, Hayley, Arseneau, Erika, Memon, Muzammil, Bhandari, Mohit, Swaminathan, Aparna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5475351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28649297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2017.1314159
_version_ 1783244548422500352
author Sprague, Sheila
Scott, Taryn
Garibaldi, Alisha
Bzovsky, Sofia
Slobogean, Gerard P.
McKay, Paula
Spurr, Hayley
Arseneau, Erika
Memon, Muzammil
Bhandari, Mohit
Swaminathan, Aparna
author_facet Sprague, Sheila
Scott, Taryn
Garibaldi, Alisha
Bzovsky, Sofia
Slobogean, Gerard P.
McKay, Paula
Spurr, Hayley
Arseneau, Erika
Memon, Muzammil
Bhandari, Mohit
Swaminathan, Aparna
author_sort Sprague, Sheila
collection PubMed
description Background: The lifetime prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) for women presenting to health care settings is estimated to be 38–59%. With the goal of providing help to victims of abuse, numerous IPV assistance programmes have been developed and evaluated across multiple health care settings. Objective: Our scoping review provides an overview of this literature to identify key areas for potential evidence-based recommendations and to focus research priorities. Methods: We conducted a search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and psycINFO. We used broad eligibility criteria to identify studies that evaluated the effectiveness of IPV assistance programmes delivered within health care settings. We completed all screening and data extraction independently and in duplicate. We used descriptive statistics to summarize all data. Results: Forty-three studies met all eligibility criteria and were included in our scoping review. Nine categories of assistance programmes were identified: counselling/advocacy, safety assessment/planning, referral, providing IPV resources, home visitation, case management, videos, provider cueing, and system changes. Characteristics of programmes amongst studies frequently reporting positive results included those in which one type of active assistance was used (77.8% of studies reported positive results), a counsellor, community worker, or case manager provided the intervention (83.3% of studies reported positive results), and programmes that were delivered over more than five sessions (100.0% of studies reported positive results). Conclusions: IPV assistance programmes are heterogeneous with regards to the types of assistance they include and how they are delivered and evaluated. This heterogeneity creates challenges in identifying which IPV assistance programmes, and which aspects of these programmes, are effective. However, it appears that many different types of IPV assistance programmes can have positive impacts on women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5475351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54753512017-06-23 A scoping review of intimate partner violence assistance programmes within health care settings Sprague, Sheila Scott, Taryn Garibaldi, Alisha Bzovsky, Sofia Slobogean, Gerard P. McKay, Paula Spurr, Hayley Arseneau, Erika Memon, Muzammil Bhandari, Mohit Swaminathan, Aparna Eur J Psychotraumatol Review Article Background: The lifetime prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) for women presenting to health care settings is estimated to be 38–59%. With the goal of providing help to victims of abuse, numerous IPV assistance programmes have been developed and evaluated across multiple health care settings. Objective: Our scoping review provides an overview of this literature to identify key areas for potential evidence-based recommendations and to focus research priorities. Methods: We conducted a search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and psycINFO. We used broad eligibility criteria to identify studies that evaluated the effectiveness of IPV assistance programmes delivered within health care settings. We completed all screening and data extraction independently and in duplicate. We used descriptive statistics to summarize all data. Results: Forty-three studies met all eligibility criteria and were included in our scoping review. Nine categories of assistance programmes were identified: counselling/advocacy, safety assessment/planning, referral, providing IPV resources, home visitation, case management, videos, provider cueing, and system changes. Characteristics of programmes amongst studies frequently reporting positive results included those in which one type of active assistance was used (77.8% of studies reported positive results), a counsellor, community worker, or case manager provided the intervention (83.3% of studies reported positive results), and programmes that were delivered over more than five sessions (100.0% of studies reported positive results). Conclusions: IPV assistance programmes are heterogeneous with regards to the types of assistance they include and how they are delivered and evaluated. This heterogeneity creates challenges in identifying which IPV assistance programmes, and which aspects of these programmes, are effective. However, it appears that many different types of IPV assistance programmes can have positive impacts on women. Taylor & Francis 2017-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5475351/ /pubmed/28649297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2017.1314159 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Sprague, Sheila
Scott, Taryn
Garibaldi, Alisha
Bzovsky, Sofia
Slobogean, Gerard P.
McKay, Paula
Spurr, Hayley
Arseneau, Erika
Memon, Muzammil
Bhandari, Mohit
Swaminathan, Aparna
A scoping review of intimate partner violence assistance programmes within health care settings
title A scoping review of intimate partner violence assistance programmes within health care settings
title_full A scoping review of intimate partner violence assistance programmes within health care settings
title_fullStr A scoping review of intimate partner violence assistance programmes within health care settings
title_full_unstemmed A scoping review of intimate partner violence assistance programmes within health care settings
title_short A scoping review of intimate partner violence assistance programmes within health care settings
title_sort scoping review of intimate partner violence assistance programmes within health care settings
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5475351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28649297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2017.1314159
work_keys_str_mv AT spraguesheila ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings
AT scotttaryn ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings
AT garibaldialisha ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings
AT bzovskysofia ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings
AT slobogeangerardp ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings
AT mckaypaula ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings
AT spurrhayley ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings
AT arseneauerika ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings
AT memonmuzammil ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings
AT bhandarimohit ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings
AT swaminathanaparna ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings
AT spraguesheila scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings
AT scotttaryn scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings
AT garibaldialisha scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings
AT bzovskysofia scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings
AT slobogeangerardp scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings
AT mckaypaula scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings
AT spurrhayley scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings
AT arseneauerika scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings
AT memonmuzammil scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings
AT bhandarimohit scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings
AT swaminathanaparna scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings