Cargando…
A scoping review of intimate partner violence assistance programmes within health care settings
Background: The lifetime prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) for women presenting to health care settings is estimated to be 38–59%. With the goal of providing help to victims of abuse, numerous IPV assistance programmes have been developed and evaluated across multiple health care setting...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5475351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28649297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2017.1314159 |
_version_ | 1783244548422500352 |
---|---|
author | Sprague, Sheila Scott, Taryn Garibaldi, Alisha Bzovsky, Sofia Slobogean, Gerard P. McKay, Paula Spurr, Hayley Arseneau, Erika Memon, Muzammil Bhandari, Mohit Swaminathan, Aparna |
author_facet | Sprague, Sheila Scott, Taryn Garibaldi, Alisha Bzovsky, Sofia Slobogean, Gerard P. McKay, Paula Spurr, Hayley Arseneau, Erika Memon, Muzammil Bhandari, Mohit Swaminathan, Aparna |
author_sort | Sprague, Sheila |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The lifetime prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) for women presenting to health care settings is estimated to be 38–59%. With the goal of providing help to victims of abuse, numerous IPV assistance programmes have been developed and evaluated across multiple health care settings. Objective: Our scoping review provides an overview of this literature to identify key areas for potential evidence-based recommendations and to focus research priorities. Methods: We conducted a search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and psycINFO. We used broad eligibility criteria to identify studies that evaluated the effectiveness of IPV assistance programmes delivered within health care settings. We completed all screening and data extraction independently and in duplicate. We used descriptive statistics to summarize all data. Results: Forty-three studies met all eligibility criteria and were included in our scoping review. Nine categories of assistance programmes were identified: counselling/advocacy, safety assessment/planning, referral, providing IPV resources, home visitation, case management, videos, provider cueing, and system changes. Characteristics of programmes amongst studies frequently reporting positive results included those in which one type of active assistance was used (77.8% of studies reported positive results), a counsellor, community worker, or case manager provided the intervention (83.3% of studies reported positive results), and programmes that were delivered over more than five sessions (100.0% of studies reported positive results). Conclusions: IPV assistance programmes are heterogeneous with regards to the types of assistance they include and how they are delivered and evaluated. This heterogeneity creates challenges in identifying which IPV assistance programmes, and which aspects of these programmes, are effective. However, it appears that many different types of IPV assistance programmes can have positive impacts on women. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5475351 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54753512017-06-23 A scoping review of intimate partner violence assistance programmes within health care settings Sprague, Sheila Scott, Taryn Garibaldi, Alisha Bzovsky, Sofia Slobogean, Gerard P. McKay, Paula Spurr, Hayley Arseneau, Erika Memon, Muzammil Bhandari, Mohit Swaminathan, Aparna Eur J Psychotraumatol Review Article Background: The lifetime prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) for women presenting to health care settings is estimated to be 38–59%. With the goal of providing help to victims of abuse, numerous IPV assistance programmes have been developed and evaluated across multiple health care settings. Objective: Our scoping review provides an overview of this literature to identify key areas for potential evidence-based recommendations and to focus research priorities. Methods: We conducted a search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and psycINFO. We used broad eligibility criteria to identify studies that evaluated the effectiveness of IPV assistance programmes delivered within health care settings. We completed all screening and data extraction independently and in duplicate. We used descriptive statistics to summarize all data. Results: Forty-three studies met all eligibility criteria and were included in our scoping review. Nine categories of assistance programmes were identified: counselling/advocacy, safety assessment/planning, referral, providing IPV resources, home visitation, case management, videos, provider cueing, and system changes. Characteristics of programmes amongst studies frequently reporting positive results included those in which one type of active assistance was used (77.8% of studies reported positive results), a counsellor, community worker, or case manager provided the intervention (83.3% of studies reported positive results), and programmes that were delivered over more than five sessions (100.0% of studies reported positive results). Conclusions: IPV assistance programmes are heterogeneous with regards to the types of assistance they include and how they are delivered and evaluated. This heterogeneity creates challenges in identifying which IPV assistance programmes, and which aspects of these programmes, are effective. However, it appears that many different types of IPV assistance programmes can have positive impacts on women. Taylor & Francis 2017-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5475351/ /pubmed/28649297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2017.1314159 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Sprague, Sheila Scott, Taryn Garibaldi, Alisha Bzovsky, Sofia Slobogean, Gerard P. McKay, Paula Spurr, Hayley Arseneau, Erika Memon, Muzammil Bhandari, Mohit Swaminathan, Aparna A scoping review of intimate partner violence assistance programmes within health care settings |
title | A scoping review of intimate partner violence assistance programmes within health care settings |
title_full | A scoping review of intimate partner violence assistance programmes within health care settings |
title_fullStr | A scoping review of intimate partner violence assistance programmes within health care settings |
title_full_unstemmed | A scoping review of intimate partner violence assistance programmes within health care settings |
title_short | A scoping review of intimate partner violence assistance programmes within health care settings |
title_sort | scoping review of intimate partner violence assistance programmes within health care settings |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5475351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28649297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2017.1314159 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spraguesheila ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings AT scotttaryn ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings AT garibaldialisha ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings AT bzovskysofia ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings AT slobogeangerardp ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings AT mckaypaula ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings AT spurrhayley ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings AT arseneauerika ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings AT memonmuzammil ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings AT bhandarimohit ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings AT swaminathanaparna ascopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings AT spraguesheila scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings AT scotttaryn scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings AT garibaldialisha scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings AT bzovskysofia scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings AT slobogeangerardp scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings AT mckaypaula scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings AT spurrhayley scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings AT arseneauerika scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings AT memonmuzammil scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings AT bhandarimohit scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings AT swaminathanaparna scopingreviewofintimatepartnerviolenceassistanceprogrammeswithinhealthcaresettings |