Cargando…

Impact of storage environment on the efficacy of hermetic storage bags

Small hermetic bags (50 and 100 kg capacities) used by smallholder farmers in several African countries have proven to be a low-cost solution for preventing storage losses due to insects. The complexity of postharvest practices and the need for ideal drying conditions, especially in the Sub-Sahara,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lane, Brett, Woloshuk, Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5476195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28659648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2017.03.008
_version_ 1783244569960251392
author Lane, Brett
Woloshuk, Charles
author_facet Lane, Brett
Woloshuk, Charles
author_sort Lane, Brett
collection PubMed
description Small hermetic bags (50 and 100 kg capacities) used by smallholder farmers in several African countries have proven to be a low-cost solution for preventing storage losses due to insects. The complexity of postharvest practices and the need for ideal drying conditions, especially in the Sub-Sahara, has led to questions about the efficacy of the hermetic bags for controlling spoilage by fungi and the potential for mycotoxin accumulation. This study compared the effects of environmental temperature and relative humidity at two locations (Indiana and Arkansas) on dry maize (14% moisture content) in woven polypropylene bags and Purdue Improved Crop Storage (PICS) hermetic bags. Temperature and relative humidity data loggers placed in the middle of each bag provided profiles of environmental influences on stored grain at the two locations. The results indicated that the PICS bags prevented moisture penetration over the three-month storage period. In contrast, maize in the woven bags increased in moisture content. For both bag types, no evidence was obtained indicating the spread of Aspergillus flavus from colonized maize to adjacent non-colonized maize. However, other storage fungi did increase during storage. The number of infected kernels did not increase in the PICS bags, but the numbers in the woven bags increased significantly. The warmer environment in Arkansas resulted in significantly higher insect populations in the woven bags than in Indiana. Insects in the PICS bags remained low at both locations. This study demonstrates that the PICS hermetic bags are effective at blocking the effects of external humidity fluctuations as well as the spread of fungi to non-infected kernels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5476195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54761952017-06-26 Impact of storage environment on the efficacy of hermetic storage bags Lane, Brett Woloshuk, Charles J Stored Prod Res Article Small hermetic bags (50 and 100 kg capacities) used by smallholder farmers in several African countries have proven to be a low-cost solution for preventing storage losses due to insects. The complexity of postharvest practices and the need for ideal drying conditions, especially in the Sub-Sahara, has led to questions about the efficacy of the hermetic bags for controlling spoilage by fungi and the potential for mycotoxin accumulation. This study compared the effects of environmental temperature and relative humidity at two locations (Indiana and Arkansas) on dry maize (14% moisture content) in woven polypropylene bags and Purdue Improved Crop Storage (PICS) hermetic bags. Temperature and relative humidity data loggers placed in the middle of each bag provided profiles of environmental influences on stored grain at the two locations. The results indicated that the PICS bags prevented moisture penetration over the three-month storage period. In contrast, maize in the woven bags increased in moisture content. For both bag types, no evidence was obtained indicating the spread of Aspergillus flavus from colonized maize to adjacent non-colonized maize. However, other storage fungi did increase during storage. The number of infected kernels did not increase in the PICS bags, but the numbers in the woven bags increased significantly. The warmer environment in Arkansas resulted in significantly higher insect populations in the woven bags than in Indiana. Insects in the PICS bags remained low at both locations. This study demonstrates that the PICS hermetic bags are effective at blocking the effects of external humidity fluctuations as well as the spread of fungi to non-infected kernels. Elsevier 2017-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5476195/ /pubmed/28659648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2017.03.008 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lane, Brett
Woloshuk, Charles
Impact of storage environment on the efficacy of hermetic storage bags
title Impact of storage environment on the efficacy of hermetic storage bags
title_full Impact of storage environment on the efficacy of hermetic storage bags
title_fullStr Impact of storage environment on the efficacy of hermetic storage bags
title_full_unstemmed Impact of storage environment on the efficacy of hermetic storage bags
title_short Impact of storage environment on the efficacy of hermetic storage bags
title_sort impact of storage environment on the efficacy of hermetic storage bags
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5476195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28659648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2017.03.008
work_keys_str_mv AT lanebrett impactofstorageenvironmentontheefficacyofhermeticstoragebags
AT woloshukcharles impactofstorageenvironmentontheefficacyofhermeticstoragebags