Cargando…
Word Recognition and Learning: Effects of Hearing Loss and Amplification Feature
Two amplification features were examined using auditory tasks that varied in stimulus familiarity. It was expected that the benefits of certain amplification features would increase as the familiarity with the stimuli decreased. A total of 20 children and 15 adults with normal hearing as well as 21...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5476321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29169314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216517709597 |
_version_ | 1783244587995758592 |
---|---|
author | Pittman, Andrea L. Stewart, Elizabeth C. Willman, Amanda P. Odgear, Ian S. |
author_facet | Pittman, Andrea L. Stewart, Elizabeth C. Willman, Amanda P. Odgear, Ian S. |
author_sort | Pittman, Andrea L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Two amplification features were examined using auditory tasks that varied in stimulus familiarity. It was expected that the benefits of certain amplification features would increase as the familiarity with the stimuli decreased. A total of 20 children and 15 adults with normal hearing as well as 21 children and 17 adults with mild to severe hearing loss participated. Three models of ear-level devices were selected based on the quality of the high-frequency amplification or the digital noise reduction (DNR) they provided. The devices were fitted to each participant and used during testing only. Participants completed three tasks: (a) word recognition, (b) repetition and lexical decision of real and nonsense words, and (c) novel word learning. Performance improved significantly with amplification for both the children and the adults with hearing loss. Performance improved further with wideband amplification for the children more than for the adults. In steady-state noise and multitalker babble, performance decreased for both groups with little to no benefit from amplification or from the use of DNR. When compared with the listeners with normal hearing, significantly poorer performance was observed for both the children and adults with hearing loss on all tasks with few exceptions. Finally, analysis of across-task performance confirmed the hypothesis that benefit increased as the familiarity of the stimuli decreased for wideband amplification but not for DNR. However, users who prefer DNR for listening comfort are not likely to jeopardize their ability to detect and learn new information when using this feature. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5476321 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54763212017-06-28 Word Recognition and Learning: Effects of Hearing Loss and Amplification Feature Pittman, Andrea L. Stewart, Elizabeth C. Willman, Amanda P. Odgear, Ian S. Trends Hear Original Articles Two amplification features were examined using auditory tasks that varied in stimulus familiarity. It was expected that the benefits of certain amplification features would increase as the familiarity with the stimuli decreased. A total of 20 children and 15 adults with normal hearing as well as 21 children and 17 adults with mild to severe hearing loss participated. Three models of ear-level devices were selected based on the quality of the high-frequency amplification or the digital noise reduction (DNR) they provided. The devices were fitted to each participant and used during testing only. Participants completed three tasks: (a) word recognition, (b) repetition and lexical decision of real and nonsense words, and (c) novel word learning. Performance improved significantly with amplification for both the children and the adults with hearing loss. Performance improved further with wideband amplification for the children more than for the adults. In steady-state noise and multitalker babble, performance decreased for both groups with little to no benefit from amplification or from the use of DNR. When compared with the listeners with normal hearing, significantly poorer performance was observed for both the children and adults with hearing loss on all tasks with few exceptions. Finally, analysis of across-task performance confirmed the hypothesis that benefit increased as the familiarity of the stimuli decreased for wideband amplification but not for DNR. However, users who prefer DNR for listening comfort are not likely to jeopardize their ability to detect and learn new information when using this feature. SAGE Publications 2017-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5476321/ /pubmed/29169314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216517709597 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Pittman, Andrea L. Stewart, Elizabeth C. Willman, Amanda P. Odgear, Ian S. Word Recognition and Learning: Effects of Hearing Loss and Amplification Feature |
title | Word Recognition and Learning: Effects of Hearing Loss and Amplification Feature |
title_full | Word Recognition and Learning: Effects of Hearing Loss and Amplification Feature |
title_fullStr | Word Recognition and Learning: Effects of Hearing Loss and Amplification Feature |
title_full_unstemmed | Word Recognition and Learning: Effects of Hearing Loss and Amplification Feature |
title_short | Word Recognition and Learning: Effects of Hearing Loss and Amplification Feature |
title_sort | word recognition and learning: effects of hearing loss and amplification feature |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5476321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29169314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216517709597 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pittmanandreal wordrecognitionandlearningeffectsofhearinglossandamplificationfeature AT stewartelizabethc wordrecognitionandlearningeffectsofhearinglossandamplificationfeature AT willmanamandap wordrecognitionandlearningeffectsofhearinglossandamplificationfeature AT odgearians wordrecognitionandlearningeffectsofhearinglossandamplificationfeature |