Cargando…

Word Recognition and Learning: Effects of Hearing Loss and Amplification Feature

Two amplification features were examined using auditory tasks that varied in stimulus familiarity. It was expected that the benefits of certain amplification features would increase as the familiarity with the stimuli decreased. A total of 20 children and 15 adults with normal hearing as well as 21...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pittman, Andrea L., Stewart, Elizabeth C., Willman, Amanda P., Odgear, Ian S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5476321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29169314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216517709597
_version_ 1783244587995758592
author Pittman, Andrea L.
Stewart, Elizabeth C.
Willman, Amanda P.
Odgear, Ian S.
author_facet Pittman, Andrea L.
Stewart, Elizabeth C.
Willman, Amanda P.
Odgear, Ian S.
author_sort Pittman, Andrea L.
collection PubMed
description Two amplification features were examined using auditory tasks that varied in stimulus familiarity. It was expected that the benefits of certain amplification features would increase as the familiarity with the stimuli decreased. A total of 20 children and 15 adults with normal hearing as well as 21 children and 17 adults with mild to severe hearing loss participated. Three models of ear-level devices were selected based on the quality of the high-frequency amplification or the digital noise reduction (DNR) they provided. The devices were fitted to each participant and used during testing only. Participants completed three tasks: (a) word recognition, (b) repetition and lexical decision of real and nonsense words, and (c) novel word learning. Performance improved significantly with amplification for both the children and the adults with hearing loss. Performance improved further with wideband amplification for the children more than for the adults. In steady-state noise and multitalker babble, performance decreased for both groups with little to no benefit from amplification or from the use of DNR. When compared with the listeners with normal hearing, significantly poorer performance was observed for both the children and adults with hearing loss on all tasks with few exceptions. Finally, analysis of across-task performance confirmed the hypothesis that benefit increased as the familiarity of the stimuli decreased for wideband amplification but not for DNR. However, users who prefer DNR for listening comfort are not likely to jeopardize their ability to detect and learn new information when using this feature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5476321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54763212017-06-28 Word Recognition and Learning: Effects of Hearing Loss and Amplification Feature Pittman, Andrea L. Stewart, Elizabeth C. Willman, Amanda P. Odgear, Ian S. Trends Hear Original Articles Two amplification features were examined using auditory tasks that varied in stimulus familiarity. It was expected that the benefits of certain amplification features would increase as the familiarity with the stimuli decreased. A total of 20 children and 15 adults with normal hearing as well as 21 children and 17 adults with mild to severe hearing loss participated. Three models of ear-level devices were selected based on the quality of the high-frequency amplification or the digital noise reduction (DNR) they provided. The devices were fitted to each participant and used during testing only. Participants completed three tasks: (a) word recognition, (b) repetition and lexical decision of real and nonsense words, and (c) novel word learning. Performance improved significantly with amplification for both the children and the adults with hearing loss. Performance improved further with wideband amplification for the children more than for the adults. In steady-state noise and multitalker babble, performance decreased for both groups with little to no benefit from amplification or from the use of DNR. When compared with the listeners with normal hearing, significantly poorer performance was observed for both the children and adults with hearing loss on all tasks with few exceptions. Finally, analysis of across-task performance confirmed the hypothesis that benefit increased as the familiarity of the stimuli decreased for wideband amplification but not for DNR. However, users who prefer DNR for listening comfort are not likely to jeopardize their ability to detect and learn new information when using this feature. SAGE Publications 2017-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5476321/ /pubmed/29169314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216517709597 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Pittman, Andrea L.
Stewart, Elizabeth C.
Willman, Amanda P.
Odgear, Ian S.
Word Recognition and Learning: Effects of Hearing Loss and Amplification Feature
title Word Recognition and Learning: Effects of Hearing Loss and Amplification Feature
title_full Word Recognition and Learning: Effects of Hearing Loss and Amplification Feature
title_fullStr Word Recognition and Learning: Effects of Hearing Loss and Amplification Feature
title_full_unstemmed Word Recognition and Learning: Effects of Hearing Loss and Amplification Feature
title_short Word Recognition and Learning: Effects of Hearing Loss and Amplification Feature
title_sort word recognition and learning: effects of hearing loss and amplification feature
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5476321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29169314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216517709597
work_keys_str_mv AT pittmanandreal wordrecognitionandlearningeffectsofhearinglossandamplificationfeature
AT stewartelizabethc wordrecognitionandlearningeffectsofhearinglossandamplificationfeature
AT willmanamandap wordrecognitionandlearningeffectsofhearinglossandamplificationfeature
AT odgearians wordrecognitionandlearningeffectsofhearinglossandamplificationfeature