Cargando…
Stereotactic body radiotherapy or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus surgery for patients with T1-3N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has been reported to be a comparable alternative therapy to surgery for patients with T1-3N0M0 non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it has not been clarified whether SBRT/SABR is as effective as su...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5476770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28652770 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S138701 |
_version_ | 1783244660739670016 |
---|---|
author | Li, Ming Yang, Xiaodong Chen, Yuhan Yang, Xinyu Dai, Xiyu Sun, Fenghao Zhang, Li Zhan, Cheng Feng, Mingxiang Wang, Qun |
author_facet | Li, Ming Yang, Xiaodong Chen, Yuhan Yang, Xinyu Dai, Xiyu Sun, Fenghao Zhang, Li Zhan, Cheng Feng, Mingxiang Wang, Qun |
author_sort | Li, Ming |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has been reported to be a comparable alternative therapy to surgery for patients with T1-3N0M0 non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it has not been clarified whether SBRT/SABR is as effective as surgery. We conducted this study to compare the efficacy of SBRT/SABR and surgery in the treatment of T1-3N0M0 NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic and a manual search of the literature was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Wiley Online Library in all published data before January 1, 2017. The pooled data included overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and locoregional/distant recurrence rate. Hazard ratio (HR) of OS (SBRT/SABR vs surgery) was used as the measure of differential effects. RESULTS: Fifteen studies, including 7,810 patients with T1-3N0M0 NSCLC, 2,986 patients in the SBRT/SABR group, and 4,824 patients in the surgery group, were pooled for the meta-analysis. Results showed that patients with SBRT/SABR had a significantly worse 5-year survival rate (HR =1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21, 1.61; P<0.01), and RFS rate (HR =1.84; 95% CI: 1.26, 2.68; P=0.002). Meanwhile, the locoregional recurrence rate (HR =1.17; 95% CI: 0.68, 1.98; P=0.57), and distant recurrence rate (HR =1.36; 95% CI: 0.77, 2.39; P=0.29) were also lower in the surgery group although results were not statistically significant. In subgroup analyses, SBRT/SABR had a significantly lower rate of 5-year survival (HR =1.46; 95% CI: 1.03, 2.06; P=0.03) compared with lobectomy. Similarly, significant differences of OS exist in comparisons of SBRT/SABR versus sublobectomy (HR =1.40; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.80; P=0.008), and wedge resection (HR =1.48; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.16; P=0.04). CONCLUSION: Surgery, both lobectomy and sublobectomy, might be superior to SBRT/SABR with regard to survival of patients with T1-3N0M0 NSCLC. Patients with T1-3N0M0 NSCLC should preferably be treated surgically prior to SBRT/SABR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5476770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54767702017-06-26 Stereotactic body radiotherapy or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus surgery for patients with T1-3N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Li, Ming Yang, Xiaodong Chen, Yuhan Yang, Xinyu Dai, Xiyu Sun, Fenghao Zhang, Li Zhan, Cheng Feng, Mingxiang Wang, Qun Onco Targets Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has been reported to be a comparable alternative therapy to surgery for patients with T1-3N0M0 non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it has not been clarified whether SBRT/SABR is as effective as surgery. We conducted this study to compare the efficacy of SBRT/SABR and surgery in the treatment of T1-3N0M0 NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic and a manual search of the literature was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Wiley Online Library in all published data before January 1, 2017. The pooled data included overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and locoregional/distant recurrence rate. Hazard ratio (HR) of OS (SBRT/SABR vs surgery) was used as the measure of differential effects. RESULTS: Fifteen studies, including 7,810 patients with T1-3N0M0 NSCLC, 2,986 patients in the SBRT/SABR group, and 4,824 patients in the surgery group, were pooled for the meta-analysis. Results showed that patients with SBRT/SABR had a significantly worse 5-year survival rate (HR =1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21, 1.61; P<0.01), and RFS rate (HR =1.84; 95% CI: 1.26, 2.68; P=0.002). Meanwhile, the locoregional recurrence rate (HR =1.17; 95% CI: 0.68, 1.98; P=0.57), and distant recurrence rate (HR =1.36; 95% CI: 0.77, 2.39; P=0.29) were also lower in the surgery group although results were not statistically significant. In subgroup analyses, SBRT/SABR had a significantly lower rate of 5-year survival (HR =1.46; 95% CI: 1.03, 2.06; P=0.03) compared with lobectomy. Similarly, significant differences of OS exist in comparisons of SBRT/SABR versus sublobectomy (HR =1.40; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.80; P=0.008), and wedge resection (HR =1.48; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.16; P=0.04). CONCLUSION: Surgery, both lobectomy and sublobectomy, might be superior to SBRT/SABR with regard to survival of patients with T1-3N0M0 NSCLC. Patients with T1-3N0M0 NSCLC should preferably be treated surgically prior to SBRT/SABR. Dove Medical Press 2017-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5476770/ /pubmed/28652770 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S138701 Text en © 2017 Li et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Li, Ming Yang, Xiaodong Chen, Yuhan Yang, Xinyu Dai, Xiyu Sun, Fenghao Zhang, Li Zhan, Cheng Feng, Mingxiang Wang, Qun Stereotactic body radiotherapy or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus surgery for patients with T1-3N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Stereotactic body radiotherapy or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus surgery for patients with T1-3N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Stereotactic body radiotherapy or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus surgery for patients with T1-3N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Stereotactic body radiotherapy or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus surgery for patients with T1-3N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Stereotactic body radiotherapy or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus surgery for patients with T1-3N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Stereotactic body radiotherapy or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus surgery for patients with T1-3N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | stereotactic body radiotherapy or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus surgery for patients with t1-3n0m0 non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5476770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28652770 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S138701 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liming stereotacticbodyradiotherapyorstereotacticablativeradiotherapyversussurgeryforpatientswitht13n0m0nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yangxiaodong stereotacticbodyradiotherapyorstereotacticablativeradiotherapyversussurgeryforpatientswitht13n0m0nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenyuhan stereotacticbodyradiotherapyorstereotacticablativeradiotherapyversussurgeryforpatientswitht13n0m0nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yangxinyu stereotacticbodyradiotherapyorstereotacticablativeradiotherapyversussurgeryforpatientswitht13n0m0nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT daixiyu stereotacticbodyradiotherapyorstereotacticablativeradiotherapyversussurgeryforpatientswitht13n0m0nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sunfenghao stereotacticbodyradiotherapyorstereotacticablativeradiotherapyversussurgeryforpatientswitht13n0m0nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangli stereotacticbodyradiotherapyorstereotacticablativeradiotherapyversussurgeryforpatientswitht13n0m0nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhancheng stereotacticbodyradiotherapyorstereotacticablativeradiotherapyversussurgeryforpatientswitht13n0m0nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fengmingxiang stereotacticbodyradiotherapyorstereotacticablativeradiotherapyversussurgeryforpatientswitht13n0m0nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangqun stereotacticbodyradiotherapyorstereotacticablativeradiotherapyversussurgeryforpatientswitht13n0m0nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |