Cargando…

Repeatability and Reproducibility of Intraocular Pressure and Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters Assessed by the Corvis ST

PURPOSE: To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of dynamic corneal response parameters measured by the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). METHODS: One eye randomly selected from 32 healthy volunteers was examined by the Corvis ST. Three different devices were used in an alternated random...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lopes, Bernardo T., Roberts, Cynthia J., Elsheikh, Ahmed, Vinciguerra, Riccardo, Vinciguerra, Paolo, Reisdorf, Sven, Berger, Stefanie, Koprowski, Robert, Ambrósio, Renato
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5476874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28676837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8515742
_version_ 1783244683278811136
author Lopes, Bernardo T.
Roberts, Cynthia J.
Elsheikh, Ahmed
Vinciguerra, Riccardo
Vinciguerra, Paolo
Reisdorf, Sven
Berger, Stefanie
Koprowski, Robert
Ambrósio, Renato
author_facet Lopes, Bernardo T.
Roberts, Cynthia J.
Elsheikh, Ahmed
Vinciguerra, Riccardo
Vinciguerra, Paolo
Reisdorf, Sven
Berger, Stefanie
Koprowski, Robert
Ambrósio, Renato
author_sort Lopes, Bernardo T.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of dynamic corneal response parameters measured by the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). METHODS: One eye randomly selected from 32 healthy volunteers was examined by the Corvis ST. Three different devices were used in an alternated random order for taking three measurements at each device in each subject. Standard intraocular pressure (IOP), the biomechanical-compensated IOP (bIOP), and DCR parameters were evaluated. The within-subject standard deviation (ζw) and coefficient of variation (CV) were assessed. RESULTS: Regarding pressure indices, the ζw was below 1 mmHg for repeatability (0.98 for IOP and 0.89 for bIOP) and the CV was 6.6% for IOP and 6.1% for bIOP. For reproducibility, the ζw was around 1 mmHg (1.12 for IOP and 1.05 for bIOP) and the CV was 7.6% for IOP and 7.1% for bIOP. Most of DCR indices presented CV for repeatability below 4%. For reproducibility, the CV of most of the indices were below 6%. The deformation amplitude (DA) ratio in 1 mm and integrated radius were below 4% (1.2% and 3.8%, resp.). CONCLUSIONS: The Corvis ST showed good precision (repeatability and reproducibility) for IOP measurements and for DCR in healthy eyes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5476874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54768742017-07-04 Repeatability and Reproducibility of Intraocular Pressure and Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters Assessed by the Corvis ST Lopes, Bernardo T. Roberts, Cynthia J. Elsheikh, Ahmed Vinciguerra, Riccardo Vinciguerra, Paolo Reisdorf, Sven Berger, Stefanie Koprowski, Robert Ambrósio, Renato J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of dynamic corneal response parameters measured by the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). METHODS: One eye randomly selected from 32 healthy volunteers was examined by the Corvis ST. Three different devices were used in an alternated random order for taking three measurements at each device in each subject. Standard intraocular pressure (IOP), the biomechanical-compensated IOP (bIOP), and DCR parameters were evaluated. The within-subject standard deviation (ζw) and coefficient of variation (CV) were assessed. RESULTS: Regarding pressure indices, the ζw was below 1 mmHg for repeatability (0.98 for IOP and 0.89 for bIOP) and the CV was 6.6% for IOP and 6.1% for bIOP. For reproducibility, the ζw was around 1 mmHg (1.12 for IOP and 1.05 for bIOP) and the CV was 7.6% for IOP and 7.1% for bIOP. Most of DCR indices presented CV for repeatability below 4%. For reproducibility, the CV of most of the indices were below 6%. The deformation amplitude (DA) ratio in 1 mm and integrated radius were below 4% (1.2% and 3.8%, resp.). CONCLUSIONS: The Corvis ST showed good precision (repeatability and reproducibility) for IOP measurements and for DCR in healthy eyes. Hindawi 2017 2017-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5476874/ /pubmed/28676837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8515742 Text en Copyright © 2017 Bernardo T. Lopes et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lopes, Bernardo T.
Roberts, Cynthia J.
Elsheikh, Ahmed
Vinciguerra, Riccardo
Vinciguerra, Paolo
Reisdorf, Sven
Berger, Stefanie
Koprowski, Robert
Ambrósio, Renato
Repeatability and Reproducibility of Intraocular Pressure and Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters Assessed by the Corvis ST
title Repeatability and Reproducibility of Intraocular Pressure and Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters Assessed by the Corvis ST
title_full Repeatability and Reproducibility of Intraocular Pressure and Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters Assessed by the Corvis ST
title_fullStr Repeatability and Reproducibility of Intraocular Pressure and Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters Assessed by the Corvis ST
title_full_unstemmed Repeatability and Reproducibility of Intraocular Pressure and Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters Assessed by the Corvis ST
title_short Repeatability and Reproducibility of Intraocular Pressure and Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters Assessed by the Corvis ST
title_sort repeatability and reproducibility of intraocular pressure and dynamic corneal response parameters assessed by the corvis st
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5476874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28676837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8515742
work_keys_str_mv AT lopesbernardot repeatabilityandreproducibilityofintraocularpressureanddynamiccornealresponseparametersassessedbythecorvisst
AT robertscynthiaj repeatabilityandreproducibilityofintraocularpressureanddynamiccornealresponseparametersassessedbythecorvisst
AT elsheikhahmed repeatabilityandreproducibilityofintraocularpressureanddynamiccornealresponseparametersassessedbythecorvisst
AT vinciguerrariccardo repeatabilityandreproducibilityofintraocularpressureanddynamiccornealresponseparametersassessedbythecorvisst
AT vinciguerrapaolo repeatabilityandreproducibilityofintraocularpressureanddynamiccornealresponseparametersassessedbythecorvisst
AT reisdorfsven repeatabilityandreproducibilityofintraocularpressureanddynamiccornealresponseparametersassessedbythecorvisst
AT bergerstefanie repeatabilityandreproducibilityofintraocularpressureanddynamiccornealresponseparametersassessedbythecorvisst
AT koprowskirobert repeatabilityandreproducibilityofintraocularpressureanddynamiccornealresponseparametersassessedbythecorvisst
AT ambrosiorenato repeatabilityandreproducibilityofintraocularpressureanddynamiccornealresponseparametersassessedbythecorvisst