Cargando…
Repeatability and Reproducibility of Intraocular Pressure and Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters Assessed by the Corvis ST
PURPOSE: To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of dynamic corneal response parameters measured by the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). METHODS: One eye randomly selected from 32 healthy volunteers was examined by the Corvis ST. Three different devices were used in an alternated random...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5476874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28676837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8515742 |
_version_ | 1783244683278811136 |
---|---|
author | Lopes, Bernardo T. Roberts, Cynthia J. Elsheikh, Ahmed Vinciguerra, Riccardo Vinciguerra, Paolo Reisdorf, Sven Berger, Stefanie Koprowski, Robert Ambrósio, Renato |
author_facet | Lopes, Bernardo T. Roberts, Cynthia J. Elsheikh, Ahmed Vinciguerra, Riccardo Vinciguerra, Paolo Reisdorf, Sven Berger, Stefanie Koprowski, Robert Ambrósio, Renato |
author_sort | Lopes, Bernardo T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of dynamic corneal response parameters measured by the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). METHODS: One eye randomly selected from 32 healthy volunteers was examined by the Corvis ST. Three different devices were used in an alternated random order for taking three measurements at each device in each subject. Standard intraocular pressure (IOP), the biomechanical-compensated IOP (bIOP), and DCR parameters were evaluated. The within-subject standard deviation (ζw) and coefficient of variation (CV) were assessed. RESULTS: Regarding pressure indices, the ζw was below 1 mmHg for repeatability (0.98 for IOP and 0.89 for bIOP) and the CV was 6.6% for IOP and 6.1% for bIOP. For reproducibility, the ζw was around 1 mmHg (1.12 for IOP and 1.05 for bIOP) and the CV was 7.6% for IOP and 7.1% for bIOP. Most of DCR indices presented CV for repeatability below 4%. For reproducibility, the CV of most of the indices were below 6%. The deformation amplitude (DA) ratio in 1 mm and integrated radius were below 4% (1.2% and 3.8%, resp.). CONCLUSIONS: The Corvis ST showed good precision (repeatability and reproducibility) for IOP measurements and for DCR in healthy eyes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5476874 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54768742017-07-04 Repeatability and Reproducibility of Intraocular Pressure and Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters Assessed by the Corvis ST Lopes, Bernardo T. Roberts, Cynthia J. Elsheikh, Ahmed Vinciguerra, Riccardo Vinciguerra, Paolo Reisdorf, Sven Berger, Stefanie Koprowski, Robert Ambrósio, Renato J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of dynamic corneal response parameters measured by the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). METHODS: One eye randomly selected from 32 healthy volunteers was examined by the Corvis ST. Three different devices were used in an alternated random order for taking three measurements at each device in each subject. Standard intraocular pressure (IOP), the biomechanical-compensated IOP (bIOP), and DCR parameters were evaluated. The within-subject standard deviation (ζw) and coefficient of variation (CV) were assessed. RESULTS: Regarding pressure indices, the ζw was below 1 mmHg for repeatability (0.98 for IOP and 0.89 for bIOP) and the CV was 6.6% for IOP and 6.1% for bIOP. For reproducibility, the ζw was around 1 mmHg (1.12 for IOP and 1.05 for bIOP) and the CV was 7.6% for IOP and 7.1% for bIOP. Most of DCR indices presented CV for repeatability below 4%. For reproducibility, the CV of most of the indices were below 6%. The deformation amplitude (DA) ratio in 1 mm and integrated radius were below 4% (1.2% and 3.8%, resp.). CONCLUSIONS: The Corvis ST showed good precision (repeatability and reproducibility) for IOP measurements and for DCR in healthy eyes. Hindawi 2017 2017-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5476874/ /pubmed/28676837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8515742 Text en Copyright © 2017 Bernardo T. Lopes et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lopes, Bernardo T. Roberts, Cynthia J. Elsheikh, Ahmed Vinciguerra, Riccardo Vinciguerra, Paolo Reisdorf, Sven Berger, Stefanie Koprowski, Robert Ambrósio, Renato Repeatability and Reproducibility of Intraocular Pressure and Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters Assessed by the Corvis ST |
title | Repeatability and Reproducibility of Intraocular Pressure and Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters Assessed by the Corvis ST |
title_full | Repeatability and Reproducibility of Intraocular Pressure and Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters Assessed by the Corvis ST |
title_fullStr | Repeatability and Reproducibility of Intraocular Pressure and Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters Assessed by the Corvis ST |
title_full_unstemmed | Repeatability and Reproducibility of Intraocular Pressure and Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters Assessed by the Corvis ST |
title_short | Repeatability and Reproducibility of Intraocular Pressure and Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters Assessed by the Corvis ST |
title_sort | repeatability and reproducibility of intraocular pressure and dynamic corneal response parameters assessed by the corvis st |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5476874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28676837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8515742 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lopesbernardot repeatabilityandreproducibilityofintraocularpressureanddynamiccornealresponseparametersassessedbythecorvisst AT robertscynthiaj repeatabilityandreproducibilityofintraocularpressureanddynamiccornealresponseparametersassessedbythecorvisst AT elsheikhahmed repeatabilityandreproducibilityofintraocularpressureanddynamiccornealresponseparametersassessedbythecorvisst AT vinciguerrariccardo repeatabilityandreproducibilityofintraocularpressureanddynamiccornealresponseparametersassessedbythecorvisst AT vinciguerrapaolo repeatabilityandreproducibilityofintraocularpressureanddynamiccornealresponseparametersassessedbythecorvisst AT reisdorfsven repeatabilityandreproducibilityofintraocularpressureanddynamiccornealresponseparametersassessedbythecorvisst AT bergerstefanie repeatabilityandreproducibilityofintraocularpressureanddynamiccornealresponseparametersassessedbythecorvisst AT koprowskirobert repeatabilityandreproducibilityofintraocularpressureanddynamiccornealresponseparametersassessedbythecorvisst AT ambrosiorenato repeatabilityandreproducibilityofintraocularpressureanddynamiccornealresponseparametersassessedbythecorvisst |