Cargando…

The Word Composite Effect Depends on Abstract Lexical Representations But Not Surface Features Like Case and Font

Prior studies have shown that words show a composite effect: When readers perform a same-different matching task on a target-part of a word, performance is affected by the irrelevant part, whose influence is severely reduced when the two parts are misaligned. However, the locus of this word composit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ventura, Paulo, Fernandes, Tânia, Leite, Isabel, Almeida, Vítor B., Casqueiro, Inês, Wong, Alan C.-N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5476921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28676783
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01036
_version_ 1783244691367526400
author Ventura, Paulo
Fernandes, Tânia
Leite, Isabel
Almeida, Vítor B.
Casqueiro, Inês
Wong, Alan C.-N.
author_facet Ventura, Paulo
Fernandes, Tânia
Leite, Isabel
Almeida, Vítor B.
Casqueiro, Inês
Wong, Alan C.-N.
author_sort Ventura, Paulo
collection PubMed
description Prior studies have shown that words show a composite effect: When readers perform a same-different matching task on a target-part of a word, performance is affected by the irrelevant part, whose influence is severely reduced when the two parts are misaligned. However, the locus of this word composite effect is largely unknown. To enlighten it, in two experiments, Portuguese readers performed the composite task on letter strings: in Experiment 1, in written words varying in surface features (between-participants: courier, notera, alternating-cAsE), and in Experiment 2 in pseudowords. The word composite effect, signaled by a significant interaction between alignment of the two word parts and congruence between parts was found in the three conditions of Experiment 1, being unaffected by NoVeLtY of the configuration or by handwritten form. This effect seems to have a lexical locus, given that in Experiment 2 only the main effect of congruence between parts was significant and was not modulated by alignment. Indeed, the cross-experiment analysis showed that words presented stronger congruence effects than pseudowords only in the aligned condition, because when misaligned the whole lexical item configuration was disrupted. Therefore, the word composite effect strongly depends on abstract lexical representations, as it is unaffected by surface features and is specific to lexical items.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5476921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54769212017-07-04 The Word Composite Effect Depends on Abstract Lexical Representations But Not Surface Features Like Case and Font Ventura, Paulo Fernandes, Tânia Leite, Isabel Almeida, Vítor B. Casqueiro, Inês Wong, Alan C.-N. Front Psychol Psychology Prior studies have shown that words show a composite effect: When readers perform a same-different matching task on a target-part of a word, performance is affected by the irrelevant part, whose influence is severely reduced when the two parts are misaligned. However, the locus of this word composite effect is largely unknown. To enlighten it, in two experiments, Portuguese readers performed the composite task on letter strings: in Experiment 1, in written words varying in surface features (between-participants: courier, notera, alternating-cAsE), and in Experiment 2 in pseudowords. The word composite effect, signaled by a significant interaction between alignment of the two word parts and congruence between parts was found in the three conditions of Experiment 1, being unaffected by NoVeLtY of the configuration or by handwritten form. This effect seems to have a lexical locus, given that in Experiment 2 only the main effect of congruence between parts was significant and was not modulated by alignment. Indeed, the cross-experiment analysis showed that words presented stronger congruence effects than pseudowords only in the aligned condition, because when misaligned the whole lexical item configuration was disrupted. Therefore, the word composite effect strongly depends on abstract lexical representations, as it is unaffected by surface features and is specific to lexical items. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5476921/ /pubmed/28676783 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01036 Text en Copyright © 2017 Ventura, Fernandes, Leite, Almeida, Casqueiro and Wong. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Ventura, Paulo
Fernandes, Tânia
Leite, Isabel
Almeida, Vítor B.
Casqueiro, Inês
Wong, Alan C.-N.
The Word Composite Effect Depends on Abstract Lexical Representations But Not Surface Features Like Case and Font
title The Word Composite Effect Depends on Abstract Lexical Representations But Not Surface Features Like Case and Font
title_full The Word Composite Effect Depends on Abstract Lexical Representations But Not Surface Features Like Case and Font
title_fullStr The Word Composite Effect Depends on Abstract Lexical Representations But Not Surface Features Like Case and Font
title_full_unstemmed The Word Composite Effect Depends on Abstract Lexical Representations But Not Surface Features Like Case and Font
title_short The Word Composite Effect Depends on Abstract Lexical Representations But Not Surface Features Like Case and Font
title_sort word composite effect depends on abstract lexical representations but not surface features like case and font
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5476921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28676783
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01036
work_keys_str_mv AT venturapaulo thewordcompositeeffectdependsonabstractlexicalrepresentationsbutnotsurfacefeatureslikecaseandfont
AT fernandestania thewordcompositeeffectdependsonabstractlexicalrepresentationsbutnotsurfacefeatureslikecaseandfont
AT leiteisabel thewordcompositeeffectdependsonabstractlexicalrepresentationsbutnotsurfacefeatureslikecaseandfont
AT almeidavitorb thewordcompositeeffectdependsonabstractlexicalrepresentationsbutnotsurfacefeatureslikecaseandfont
AT casqueiroines thewordcompositeeffectdependsonabstractlexicalrepresentationsbutnotsurfacefeatureslikecaseandfont
AT wongalancn thewordcompositeeffectdependsonabstractlexicalrepresentationsbutnotsurfacefeatureslikecaseandfont
AT venturapaulo wordcompositeeffectdependsonabstractlexicalrepresentationsbutnotsurfacefeatureslikecaseandfont
AT fernandestania wordcompositeeffectdependsonabstractlexicalrepresentationsbutnotsurfacefeatureslikecaseandfont
AT leiteisabel wordcompositeeffectdependsonabstractlexicalrepresentationsbutnotsurfacefeatureslikecaseandfont
AT almeidavitorb wordcompositeeffectdependsonabstractlexicalrepresentationsbutnotsurfacefeatureslikecaseandfont
AT casqueiroines wordcompositeeffectdependsonabstractlexicalrepresentationsbutnotsurfacefeatureslikecaseandfont
AT wongalancn wordcompositeeffectdependsonabstractlexicalrepresentationsbutnotsurfacefeatureslikecaseandfont