Cargando…
A pendant proton shuttle on [Fe(4)N(CO)(12)](–) alters product selectivity in formate vs. H(2) production via the hydride [H–Fe(4)N(CO)(12)](–)
Proton relays are known to increase reaction rates for H(2) evolution and lower overpotentials in electrocatalytic reactions. In this report we describe two electrocatalysts, [Fe(4)N(CO)(11)(PPh(3))](–) (1(–)) which has no proton relay, and hydroxyl-containing [Fe(4)N(CO)(11)(Ph(2)P(CH(2))(2)OH)](–)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal Society of Chemistry
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5477009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28660048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c5sc03169a |
Sumario: | Proton relays are known to increase reaction rates for H(2) evolution and lower overpotentials in electrocatalytic reactions. In this report we describe two electrocatalysts, [Fe(4)N(CO)(11)(PPh(3))](–) (1(–)) which has no proton relay, and hydroxyl-containing [Fe(4)N(CO)(11)(Ph(2)P(CH(2))(2)OH)](–) (2(–)). Solid state structures indicate that these phosphine-substituted clusters are direct analogs of [Fe(4)N(CO)(12)](–) where one CO ligand has been replaced by a phosphine. We show that the proton relay changes the selectivity of reactions: CO(2) is reduced selectively to formate by 1(–) in the absence of a relay, and protons are reduced to H(2) under a CO(2) atmosphere by 2(–). These results implicate a hydride intermediate in the mechanism of the reactions and demonstrate the importance of controlling proton delivery to control product selectivity. Thermochemical measurements performed using infrared spectroelectrochemistry provided pK(a) and hydricity values for [HFe(4)N(CO)(11)(PPh(3))](–), which are 23.7, and 45.5 kcal mol(–1), respectively. The pK(a) of the hydroxyl group in 2(–) was determined to fall between 29 and 41, and this suggests that the proximity of the proton relay to the active catalytic site plays a significant role in the product selectivity observed, since the acidity alone does not account for the observed results. More generally, this work emphasizes the importance of substrate delivery kinetics in determining the selectivity of CO(2) reduction reactions that proceed through metal–hydride intermediates. |
---|