Cargando…

Emergency treatment with levetiracetam or phenytoin in status epilepticus in children—the EcLiPSE study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is the most common life-threatening neurological emergency in childhood. These children are also at risk of significant morbidity, with acute and chronic impact on the family and the health and social care systems. The current recommended first-choice,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lyttle, Mark D., Gamble, Carrol, Messahel, Shrouk, Hickey, Helen, Iyer, Anand, Woolfall, Kerry, Humphreys, Amy, Bacon, Naomi E. A., Roper, Louise, Babl, Franz E., Dalziel, Stuart R., Ryan, Mary, Appleton, Richard E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5477100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28629473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2010-8
_version_ 1783244723643744256
author Lyttle, Mark D.
Gamble, Carrol
Messahel, Shrouk
Hickey, Helen
Iyer, Anand
Woolfall, Kerry
Humphreys, Amy
Bacon, Naomi E. A.
Roper, Louise
Babl, Franz E.
Dalziel, Stuart R.
Ryan, Mary
Appleton, Richard E.
author_facet Lyttle, Mark D.
Gamble, Carrol
Messahel, Shrouk
Hickey, Helen
Iyer, Anand
Woolfall, Kerry
Humphreys, Amy
Bacon, Naomi E. A.
Roper, Louise
Babl, Franz E.
Dalziel, Stuart R.
Ryan, Mary
Appleton, Richard E.
author_sort Lyttle, Mark D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is the most common life-threatening neurological emergency in childhood. These children are also at risk of significant morbidity, with acute and chronic impact on the family and the health and social care systems. The current recommended first-choice, second-line treatment in children aged 6 months and above is intravenous phenytoin (fosphenytoin in the USA), although there is a lack of evidence for its use and it is associated with significant side effects. Emerging evidence suggests that intravenous levetiracetam may be effective as a second-line agent for CSE, and fewer adverse effects have been described. This trial therefore aims to determine whether intravenous phenytoin or levetiracetam is more effective, and safer, in treating childhood CSE. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a phase IV, multi-centre, parallel group, randomised controlled, open-label trial. Following treatment for CSE with first-line treatment, children with ongoing seizures are randomised to receive either phenytoin (20 mg/kg, maximum 2 g) or levetiracetam (40 mg/kg, maximum 2.5 g) intravenously. The primary outcome measure is the cessation of all visible signs of CSE as determined by the treating clinician. Secondary outcome measures include the need for further anti-seizure medications or rapid sequence induction for ongoing CSE, admission to critical care areas, and serious adverse reactions. Patients are recruited without prior consent, with deferred consent sought at an appropriate time for the family. The primary analysis will be by intention-to-treat. The primary outcome is a time to event outcome and a sample size of 140 participants in each group will have 80% power to detect an increase in CSE cessation rates from 60% to 75%. Our total sample size of 308 randomised and treated participants will allow for 10% loss to follow-up. DISCUSSION: This clinical trial will determine whether phenytoin or levetiracetam is more effective as an intravenous second-line agent for CSE, and provide evidence for management recommendations. In addition, this trial will also provide data on which of these therapies is safer in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN identifier, ISRCTN22567894. Registered on 27 August 2015 EudraCT identifier, 2014-002188-13. Registered on 21 May 2014 NIHR HTA Grant: 12/127/134 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2010-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5477100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54771002017-06-22 Emergency treatment with levetiracetam or phenytoin in status epilepticus in children—the EcLiPSE study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Lyttle, Mark D. Gamble, Carrol Messahel, Shrouk Hickey, Helen Iyer, Anand Woolfall, Kerry Humphreys, Amy Bacon, Naomi E. A. Roper, Louise Babl, Franz E. Dalziel, Stuart R. Ryan, Mary Appleton, Richard E. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is the most common life-threatening neurological emergency in childhood. These children are also at risk of significant morbidity, with acute and chronic impact on the family and the health and social care systems. The current recommended first-choice, second-line treatment in children aged 6 months and above is intravenous phenytoin (fosphenytoin in the USA), although there is a lack of evidence for its use and it is associated with significant side effects. Emerging evidence suggests that intravenous levetiracetam may be effective as a second-line agent for CSE, and fewer adverse effects have been described. This trial therefore aims to determine whether intravenous phenytoin or levetiracetam is more effective, and safer, in treating childhood CSE. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a phase IV, multi-centre, parallel group, randomised controlled, open-label trial. Following treatment for CSE with first-line treatment, children with ongoing seizures are randomised to receive either phenytoin (20 mg/kg, maximum 2 g) or levetiracetam (40 mg/kg, maximum 2.5 g) intravenously. The primary outcome measure is the cessation of all visible signs of CSE as determined by the treating clinician. Secondary outcome measures include the need for further anti-seizure medications or rapid sequence induction for ongoing CSE, admission to critical care areas, and serious adverse reactions. Patients are recruited without prior consent, with deferred consent sought at an appropriate time for the family. The primary analysis will be by intention-to-treat. The primary outcome is a time to event outcome and a sample size of 140 participants in each group will have 80% power to detect an increase in CSE cessation rates from 60% to 75%. Our total sample size of 308 randomised and treated participants will allow for 10% loss to follow-up. DISCUSSION: This clinical trial will determine whether phenytoin or levetiracetam is more effective as an intravenous second-line agent for CSE, and provide evidence for management recommendations. In addition, this trial will also provide data on which of these therapies is safer in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN identifier, ISRCTN22567894. Registered on 27 August 2015 EudraCT identifier, 2014-002188-13. Registered on 21 May 2014 NIHR HTA Grant: 12/127/134 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2010-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5477100/ /pubmed/28629473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2010-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Lyttle, Mark D.
Gamble, Carrol
Messahel, Shrouk
Hickey, Helen
Iyer, Anand
Woolfall, Kerry
Humphreys, Amy
Bacon, Naomi E. A.
Roper, Louise
Babl, Franz E.
Dalziel, Stuart R.
Ryan, Mary
Appleton, Richard E.
Emergency treatment with levetiracetam or phenytoin in status epilepticus in children—the EcLiPSE study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Emergency treatment with levetiracetam or phenytoin in status epilepticus in children—the EcLiPSE study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Emergency treatment with levetiracetam or phenytoin in status epilepticus in children—the EcLiPSE study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Emergency treatment with levetiracetam or phenytoin in status epilepticus in children—the EcLiPSE study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Emergency treatment with levetiracetam or phenytoin in status epilepticus in children—the EcLiPSE study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Emergency treatment with levetiracetam or phenytoin in status epilepticus in children—the EcLiPSE study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort emergency treatment with levetiracetam or phenytoin in status epilepticus in children—the eclipse study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5477100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28629473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2010-8
work_keys_str_mv AT lyttlemarkd emergencytreatmentwithlevetiracetamorphenytoininstatusepilepticusinchildrentheeclipsestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gamblecarrol emergencytreatmentwithlevetiracetamorphenytoininstatusepilepticusinchildrentheeclipsestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT messahelshrouk emergencytreatmentwithlevetiracetamorphenytoininstatusepilepticusinchildrentheeclipsestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hickeyhelen emergencytreatmentwithlevetiracetamorphenytoininstatusepilepticusinchildrentheeclipsestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT iyeranand emergencytreatmentwithlevetiracetamorphenytoininstatusepilepticusinchildrentheeclipsestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT woolfallkerry emergencytreatmentwithlevetiracetamorphenytoininstatusepilepticusinchildrentheeclipsestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT humphreysamy emergencytreatmentwithlevetiracetamorphenytoininstatusepilepticusinchildrentheeclipsestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT baconnaomiea emergencytreatmentwithlevetiracetamorphenytoininstatusepilepticusinchildrentheeclipsestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT roperlouise emergencytreatmentwithlevetiracetamorphenytoininstatusepilepticusinchildrentheeclipsestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bablfranze emergencytreatmentwithlevetiracetamorphenytoininstatusepilepticusinchildrentheeclipsestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dalzielstuartr emergencytreatmentwithlevetiracetamorphenytoininstatusepilepticusinchildrentheeclipsestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ryanmary emergencytreatmentwithlevetiracetamorphenytoininstatusepilepticusinchildrentheeclipsestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT appletonricharde emergencytreatmentwithlevetiracetamorphenytoininstatusepilepticusinchildrentheeclipsestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT emergencytreatmentwithlevetiracetamorphenytoininstatusepilepticusinchildrentheeclipsestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial