Cargando…

Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study

BACKGROUND: The methodological quality and completeness of reporting of the systematic reviews (SRs) is fundamental to optimal implementation of evidence-based health care and the reduction of research waste. Methods exist to appraise SRs yet little is known about how they are used in SRs or where t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Pussegoda, Kusala, Turner, Lucy, Garritty, Chantelle, Mayhew, Alain, Skidmore, Becky, Stevens, Adrienne, Boutron, Isabelle, Sarkis-Onofre, Rafael, Bjerre, Lise M., Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn, Altman, Douglas G., Moher, David
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2017
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5477124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28629396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0507-6

Ejemplares similares

Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
por: Pussegoda, Kusala, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Screening for esophageal adenocarcinoma and precancerous conditions (dysplasia and Barrett’s esophagus) in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease with or without other risk factors: two systematic reviews and one overview of reviews to inform a guideline of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC)
por: Hamel, Candyce, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The effects of sign language on spoken language acquisition in children with hearing loss: a systematic review protocol
por: Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth M, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Effectiveness of brief interventions as part of the screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) model for reducing the non-medical use of psychoactive substances: a systematic review protocol
por: Young, Matthew M, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Reporting Methods of Blinding in Randomized Trials Assessing Nonpharmacological Treatments
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making: a descriptive analysis of processes and methods
por: Polisena, Julie, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The prevalence of patient engagement in published trials: a systematic review
por: Fergusson, Dean, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Effectiveness of Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Workers Caring for Patients with Filovirus Disease: A Rapid Review
por: Hersi, Mona, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Does journal endorsement of reporting guidelines influence the completeness of reporting of health research? A systematic review protocol
por: Shamseer, Larissa, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

An Evaluation of Epidemiological and Reporting Characteristics of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Systematic Reviews (SRs)
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Developing WHO rapid advice guidelines in the setting of a public health emergency
por: Garritty, Chantelle M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Assessing how information is packaged in rapid reviews for policy-makers and other stakeholders: a cross-sectional study
por: Garritty, Chantelle, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group to play a leading role in guiding the production of informed high-quality, timely research evidence syntheses
por: Garritty, Chantelle, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

An evaluation of the completeness of safety reporting in reports of complementary and alternative medicine trials
por: Turner, Lucy-Ann, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Paper 2: Performing rapid reviews
por: King, Valerie J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Updating Systematic Reviews: An International Survey
por: Garritty, Chantelle, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

The matching quality of experimental and control interventions in blinded pharmacological randomised clinical trials: a methodological systematic review
por: Bello, Segun, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review
por: Hamel, Candyce, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Effects of medical and non-medical cannabis use in older adults: protocol for a scoping review
por: Wolfe, Dianna, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Coding of adverse events of suicidality in clinical study reports of duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder: descriptive study
por: Maund, Emma, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Effectiveness of brief interventions as part of the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) model for reducing the nonmedical use of psychoactive substances: a systematic review
por: Young, Matthew M, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Assessing the format and content of journal published and non-journal published rapid review reports: A comparative study
por: Garritty, Chantelle, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Methods of Blinding in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing Pharmacologic Treatments: A Systematic Review
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews
por: Garritty, Chantelle, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols
por: Chan, An-Wen, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Promoting public access to clinical trial protocols: challenges and recommendations
por: Chan, An-Wen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Pain relief that matters to patients: systematic review of empirical studies assessing the minimum clinically important difference in acute pain
por: Olsen, Mette Frahm, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Who’s Using PDAs? Estimates of PDA Use by Health Care Providers: A Systematic Review of Surveys
por: Garritty, Chantelle, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Ghost Authorship in Industry-Initiated Randomised Trials
por: Gøtzsche, Peter C, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Safety of influenza vaccination during pregnancy: a systematic review
por: Wolfe, Dianna M, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Influence and management of conflicts of interest in randomised clinical trials: qualitative interview study
por: Østengaard, Lasse, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The effectiveness and safety of emergency department short stay units: a rapid review
por: Konnyu, Kristin J, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
por: Jørgensen, Lars, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals’ endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review
por: Stevens, Adrienne, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research
por: Blanco, David, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application
por: Peters, Micah D. J., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Acupuncture treatment for pain: systematic review of randomised clinical trials with acupuncture, placebo acupuncture, and no acupuncture groups
por: Madsen, Matias Vested, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Spontaneous improvement in randomised clinical trials: meta-analysis of three-armed trials comparing no treatment, placebo and active intervention
por: Krogsbøll, Lasse Theis, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Divine intervention? A Cochrane review on intercessory prayer gone beyond science and reason
por: Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_cao9q120s5rk6586jaba0v0c2c