Cargando…

Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics

BACKGROUND: The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is a commonly used improvement process in health care settings, although its documented use in pragmatic clinical research is rare. A recent pragmatic clinical research study, called the Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Popu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coury, Jennifer, Schneider, Jennifer L., Rivelli, Jennifer S., Petrik, Amanda F., Seibel, Evelyn, D’Agostini, Brieshon, Taplin, Stephen H., Green, Beverly B., Coronado, Gloria D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5477281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28629348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2364-3
_version_ 1783244759579492352
author Coury, Jennifer
Schneider, Jennifer L.
Rivelli, Jennifer S.
Petrik, Amanda F.
Seibel, Evelyn
D’Agostini, Brieshon
Taplin, Stephen H.
Green, Beverly B.
Coronado, Gloria D.
author_facet Coury, Jennifer
Schneider, Jennifer L.
Rivelli, Jennifer S.
Petrik, Amanda F.
Seibel, Evelyn
D’Agostini, Brieshon
Taplin, Stephen H.
Green, Beverly B.
Coronado, Gloria D.
author_sort Coury, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is a commonly used improvement process in health care settings, although its documented use in pragmatic clinical research is rare. A recent pragmatic clinical research study, called the Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations (STOP CRC), used this process to optimize the research implementation of an automated colon cancer screening outreach program in intervention clinics. We describe the process of using this PDSA approach, the selection of PDSA topics by clinic leaders, and project leaders’ reactions to using PDSA in pragmatic research. METHODS: STOP CRC is a cluster-randomized pragmatic study that aims to test the effectiveness of a direct-mail fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) program involving eight Federally Qualified Health Centers in Oregon and California. We and a practice improvement specialist trained in the PDSA process delivered structured presentations to leaders of these centers; the presentations addressed how to apply the PDSA process to improve implementation of a mailed outreach program offering colorectal cancer screening through FIT tests. Center leaders submitted PDSA plans and delivered reports via webinar at quarterly meetings of the project’s advisory board. Project staff conducted one-on-one, 45-min interviews with project leads from each health center to assess the reaction to and value of the PDSA process in supporting the implementation of STOP CRC. RESULTS: Clinic-selected PDSA activities included refining the intervention staffing model, improving outreach materials, and changing workflow steps. Common benefits of using PDSA cycles in pragmatic research were that it provided a structure for staff to focus on improving the program and it allowed staff to test the change they wanted to see. A commonly reported challenge was measuring the success of the PDSA process with the available electronic medical record tools. CONCLUSION: Understanding how the PDSA process can be applied to pragmatic trials and the reaction of clinic staff to their use may help clinics integrate evidence-based interventions into their everyday care processes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01742065. Registered October 31, 2013.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5477281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54772812017-06-23 Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics Coury, Jennifer Schneider, Jennifer L. Rivelli, Jennifer S. Petrik, Amanda F. Seibel, Evelyn D’Agostini, Brieshon Taplin, Stephen H. Green, Beverly B. Coronado, Gloria D. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is a commonly used improvement process in health care settings, although its documented use in pragmatic clinical research is rare. A recent pragmatic clinical research study, called the Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations (STOP CRC), used this process to optimize the research implementation of an automated colon cancer screening outreach program in intervention clinics. We describe the process of using this PDSA approach, the selection of PDSA topics by clinic leaders, and project leaders’ reactions to using PDSA in pragmatic research. METHODS: STOP CRC is a cluster-randomized pragmatic study that aims to test the effectiveness of a direct-mail fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) program involving eight Federally Qualified Health Centers in Oregon and California. We and a practice improvement specialist trained in the PDSA process delivered structured presentations to leaders of these centers; the presentations addressed how to apply the PDSA process to improve implementation of a mailed outreach program offering colorectal cancer screening through FIT tests. Center leaders submitted PDSA plans and delivered reports via webinar at quarterly meetings of the project’s advisory board. Project staff conducted one-on-one, 45-min interviews with project leads from each health center to assess the reaction to and value of the PDSA process in supporting the implementation of STOP CRC. RESULTS: Clinic-selected PDSA activities included refining the intervention staffing model, improving outreach materials, and changing workflow steps. Common benefits of using PDSA cycles in pragmatic research were that it provided a structure for staff to focus on improving the program and it allowed staff to test the change they wanted to see. A commonly reported challenge was measuring the success of the PDSA process with the available electronic medical record tools. CONCLUSION: Understanding how the PDSA process can be applied to pragmatic trials and the reaction of clinic staff to their use may help clinics integrate evidence-based interventions into their everyday care processes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01742065. Registered October 31, 2013. BioMed Central 2017-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5477281/ /pubmed/28629348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2364-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Coury, Jennifer
Schneider, Jennifer L.
Rivelli, Jennifer S.
Petrik, Amanda F.
Seibel, Evelyn
D’Agostini, Brieshon
Taplin, Stephen H.
Green, Beverly B.
Coronado, Gloria D.
Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics
title Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics
title_full Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics
title_fullStr Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics
title_full_unstemmed Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics
title_short Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics
title_sort applying the plan-do-study-act (pdsa) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5477281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28629348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2364-3
work_keys_str_mv AT couryjennifer applyingtheplandostudyactpdsaapproachtoalargepragmaticstudyinvolvingsafetynetclinics
AT schneiderjenniferl applyingtheplandostudyactpdsaapproachtoalargepragmaticstudyinvolvingsafetynetclinics
AT rivellijennifers applyingtheplandostudyactpdsaapproachtoalargepragmaticstudyinvolvingsafetynetclinics
AT petrikamandaf applyingtheplandostudyactpdsaapproachtoalargepragmaticstudyinvolvingsafetynetclinics
AT seibelevelyn applyingtheplandostudyactpdsaapproachtoalargepragmaticstudyinvolvingsafetynetclinics
AT dagostinibrieshon applyingtheplandostudyactpdsaapproachtoalargepragmaticstudyinvolvingsafetynetclinics
AT taplinstephenh applyingtheplandostudyactpdsaapproachtoalargepragmaticstudyinvolvingsafetynetclinics
AT greenbeverlyb applyingtheplandostudyactpdsaapproachtoalargepragmaticstudyinvolvingsafetynetclinics
AT coronadogloriad applyingtheplandostudyactpdsaapproachtoalargepragmaticstudyinvolvingsafetynetclinics