Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness research: what to do when experts disagree about risks

BACKGROUND: Ethical issues related to comparative effectiveness research, or research that compares existing standards of care, have recently received considerable attention. In this paper we focus on how Ethics Review Committees (ERCs) should evaluate the risks of comparative effectiveness research...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Lie, Reidar K., Chan, Francis K.L., Grady, Christine, Ng, Vincent H., Wendler, David
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2017
Materias:	Debate
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5477349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28629343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0202-0

Ejemplares similares

What counts as reliable evidence for public health policy: the case of circumcision for preventing HIV infection
por: Lie, Reidar K, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Health, human rights and mobilization of resources for health
por: Lie, Reidar K
Publicado: (2004)

Following the giant’s paces-governance issues and bioethical reflections in China
por: Wang, Zhaochen, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Obligations of low income countries in ensuring equity in global health financing
por: Barugahare, John, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

What is presumed when we presume consent?
por: Pierscionek, Barbara K
Publicado: (2008)

When experts disagree: interviews with public health experts on health outcomes in the UK 2010–2020
por: Hiam, Lucinda, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

What to do when patients and physicians disagree? Qualitative research among physicians with different working experiences
por: van Bruchem-Visser, Rozemarijn Lidewij, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree?
por: Tripp, John H, et al.
Publicado: (1995)

Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree?
por: Hotopf, Matthew
Publicado: (1995)

Public values and plurality in health priority setting: What to do when people disagree and why we should care about reasons as well as choices
por: Baker, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A child of two mothers: what about the father? Italian overview
por: Montanari Vergallo, Gianluca
Publicado: (2019)

Physical activity recommendations for health: what should Europe do?
por: Oja, Pekka, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

What else can we do to prevent diabetic retinopathy?
por: Simó, Rafael, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Disagreeing on Whether Agreement Is Persuasive: Perceptions of Expert Group Decisions
por: Votruba, Ashley M., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Do we understand the intervention? What complex intervention research can teach us for the evaluation of clinical ethics support services (CESS)
por: Schildmann, Jan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

In Defense of Best Interests: When Parents and Clinicians Disagree
por: Coulson-Smith, Peta, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree with Each Other?
por: Foster, Claire
Publicado: (1995)

Exogenous surfactant therapy in 2013: what is next? who, when and how should we treat newborn infants in the future?
por: Lopez, Emmanuel, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Sports-based recreation as a means to address social inequity in health: why, when, where, who, what, and how
por: Elsborg, Peter, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Patient delay in cancer diagnosis: what do we really mean and can we be more specific?
por: Dobson, Christina Mary, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Beyond NIMBYs and NOOMBYs: what can wind farm controversies teach us about public involvement in hospital closures?
por: Stewart, Ellen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

An ethical analysis of clinical triage protocols and decision-making frameworks: what do the principles of justice, freedom, and a disability rights approach demand of us?
por: Zhu, Jane, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Disagreeing in context
por: Marques, Teresa
Publicado: (2015)

Doctors Disagree
Publicado: (1920)

Doctors Disagree
Publicado: (1886)

Doctors Disagree
Publicado: (1887)

Doctors Disagree
por: Jennings, Ella A.
Publicado: (1892)

When patients and surgeons disagree about surgical outcome: investigating patient factors and chart note communication
por: Schwartz, Carolyn E., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Ethics review of big data research: What should stay and what should be reformed?
por: Ferretti, Agata, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Autonomy and couples’ joint decision-making in healthcare
por: Osamor, Pauline E., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Integrative oncology for breast cancer patients: introduction of an expert-based model
por: Dobos, Gustav J, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Can a ‘consent to contact’ community help research teams overcome barriers to recruitment? The development and impact of the ‘Research for the Future’ community
por: Grady, Katherine, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

What do we have to know from migrants' past exposures to understand their health status? a life course approach
por: Spallek, Jacob, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Ethics preparedness: facilitating ethics review during outbreaks - recommendations from an expert panel
por: Saxena, Abha, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

We need to think about data governance for dementia research in a digital era
por: Milne, Richard, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Bisphosphonate use in the horse: what is good and what is not?
por: Mitchell, Alexis, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Implementing clinical ethics committees as a complex intervention: presentation of a feasibility study in community care
por: Magelssen, Morten, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A genetic researcher’s devil’s dilemma: Warn relatives about their genetic risk or respect confidentiality agreements with research participants?
por: van den Heuvel, Lieke M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Evidence-based ethics – What it should be and what it shouldn't
por: Strech, Daniel
Publicado: (2008)

Ethical issues in denial of church wedding based on couple’s hemoglobin genotype in Enugu, south eastern Nigeria
por: Ezugwu, Euzebus C., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_uoe5knqhvo8dn1edf20a6v5702