Cargando…

Results of the first interim analysis of the RAPPER II trial in patients with spinal cord injury: ambulation and functional exercise programs in the REX powered walking aid

BACKGROUND: The RAPPER II study investigates the feasibility, safety and acceptability of using the REX self-stabilising robotic exoskeleton in people with spinal cord injury (SCI) who are obligatory wheelchair users. Feasibility is assessed by the completion of transfer into the REX device, compete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Birch, Nick, Graham, Jon, Priestley, Tom, Heywood, Chris, Sakel, Mohamed, Gall, Angela, Nunn, Andrew, Signal, Nada
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5477376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28629390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0274-6
_version_ 1783244779131240448
author Birch, Nick
Graham, Jon
Priestley, Tom
Heywood, Chris
Sakel, Mohamed
Gall, Angela
Nunn, Andrew
Signal, Nada
author_facet Birch, Nick
Graham, Jon
Priestley, Tom
Heywood, Chris
Sakel, Mohamed
Gall, Angela
Nunn, Andrew
Signal, Nada
author_sort Birch, Nick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The RAPPER II study investigates the feasibility, safety and acceptability of using the REX self-stabilising robotic exoskeleton in people with spinal cord injury (SCI) who are obligatory wheelchair users. Feasibility is assessed by the completion of transfer into the REX device, competency in achieving autonomous control and completion of upper body exercise in an upright position in the REX device. Safety is measured by the occurrence of serious adverse events. Device acceptability is assessed with a user questionnaire. METHODS: RAPPER II is a prospective, multi-centre, open label, non-randomised, non-comparative cohort study in people with SCI recruited from neurological rehabilitation centres in the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. This is the planned interim report of the first 20 participants. Each completed a transfer into the REX, were trained to achieve machine control and completed Timed Up and Go (TUG) tests as well as upper body exercises in standing in a single first time session. The time to achieve each task as well as the amount of assistance required was recorded. After finishing the trial tasks a User Experience questionnaire, exploring device acceptability, was completed. RESULTS: All participants could transfer into the REX. The mean transfer time was 439 s. Nineteen completed the exercise regime. Eighteen could achieve autonomous control of the REX, 17 of whom needed either no assistance or the help of just one therapist. Eighteen participants completed at least one TUG test in a mean time of 313 s, 15 with the assistance of just one therapist. The questionnaire demonstrated high levels of acceptability amongst users. There were no Serious Adverse Events. CONCLUSIONS: This first interim analysis of RAPPER II shows that it is feasible and safe for people with SCI to use the REX powered assisted walking device to ambulate and exercise in. Participants with tetraplegia and paraplegia could walk and perform a functional exercise program when standing needing only modest levels of assistance in most cases. User acceptability was high. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02417532. Registered 11 April 2015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5477376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54773762017-06-23 Results of the first interim analysis of the RAPPER II trial in patients with spinal cord injury: ambulation and functional exercise programs in the REX powered walking aid Birch, Nick Graham, Jon Priestley, Tom Heywood, Chris Sakel, Mohamed Gall, Angela Nunn, Andrew Signal, Nada J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: The RAPPER II study investigates the feasibility, safety and acceptability of using the REX self-stabilising robotic exoskeleton in people with spinal cord injury (SCI) who are obligatory wheelchair users. Feasibility is assessed by the completion of transfer into the REX device, competency in achieving autonomous control and completion of upper body exercise in an upright position in the REX device. Safety is measured by the occurrence of serious adverse events. Device acceptability is assessed with a user questionnaire. METHODS: RAPPER II is a prospective, multi-centre, open label, non-randomised, non-comparative cohort study in people with SCI recruited from neurological rehabilitation centres in the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. This is the planned interim report of the first 20 participants. Each completed a transfer into the REX, were trained to achieve machine control and completed Timed Up and Go (TUG) tests as well as upper body exercises in standing in a single first time session. The time to achieve each task as well as the amount of assistance required was recorded. After finishing the trial tasks a User Experience questionnaire, exploring device acceptability, was completed. RESULTS: All participants could transfer into the REX. The mean transfer time was 439 s. Nineteen completed the exercise regime. Eighteen could achieve autonomous control of the REX, 17 of whom needed either no assistance or the help of just one therapist. Eighteen participants completed at least one TUG test in a mean time of 313 s, 15 with the assistance of just one therapist. The questionnaire demonstrated high levels of acceptability amongst users. There were no Serious Adverse Events. CONCLUSIONS: This first interim analysis of RAPPER II shows that it is feasible and safe for people with SCI to use the REX powered assisted walking device to ambulate and exercise in. Participants with tetraplegia and paraplegia could walk and perform a functional exercise program when standing needing only modest levels of assistance in most cases. User acceptability was high. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02417532. Registered 11 April 2015. BioMed Central 2017-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5477376/ /pubmed/28629390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0274-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Birch, Nick
Graham, Jon
Priestley, Tom
Heywood, Chris
Sakel, Mohamed
Gall, Angela
Nunn, Andrew
Signal, Nada
Results of the first interim analysis of the RAPPER II trial in patients with spinal cord injury: ambulation and functional exercise programs in the REX powered walking aid
title Results of the first interim analysis of the RAPPER II trial in patients with spinal cord injury: ambulation and functional exercise programs in the REX powered walking aid
title_full Results of the first interim analysis of the RAPPER II trial in patients with spinal cord injury: ambulation and functional exercise programs in the REX powered walking aid
title_fullStr Results of the first interim analysis of the RAPPER II trial in patients with spinal cord injury: ambulation and functional exercise programs in the REX powered walking aid
title_full_unstemmed Results of the first interim analysis of the RAPPER II trial in patients with spinal cord injury: ambulation and functional exercise programs in the REX powered walking aid
title_short Results of the first interim analysis of the RAPPER II trial in patients with spinal cord injury: ambulation and functional exercise programs in the REX powered walking aid
title_sort results of the first interim analysis of the rapper ii trial in patients with spinal cord injury: ambulation and functional exercise programs in the rex powered walking aid
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5477376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28629390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0274-6
work_keys_str_mv AT birchnick resultsofthefirstinterimanalysisoftherapperiitrialinpatientswithspinalcordinjuryambulationandfunctionalexerciseprogramsintherexpoweredwalkingaid
AT grahamjon resultsofthefirstinterimanalysisoftherapperiitrialinpatientswithspinalcordinjuryambulationandfunctionalexerciseprogramsintherexpoweredwalkingaid
AT priestleytom resultsofthefirstinterimanalysisoftherapperiitrialinpatientswithspinalcordinjuryambulationandfunctionalexerciseprogramsintherexpoweredwalkingaid
AT heywoodchris resultsofthefirstinterimanalysisoftherapperiitrialinpatientswithspinalcordinjuryambulationandfunctionalexerciseprogramsintherexpoweredwalkingaid
AT sakelmohamed resultsofthefirstinterimanalysisoftherapperiitrialinpatientswithspinalcordinjuryambulationandfunctionalexerciseprogramsintherexpoweredwalkingaid
AT gallangela resultsofthefirstinterimanalysisoftherapperiitrialinpatientswithspinalcordinjuryambulationandfunctionalexerciseprogramsintherexpoweredwalkingaid
AT nunnandrew resultsofthefirstinterimanalysisoftherapperiitrialinpatientswithspinalcordinjuryambulationandfunctionalexerciseprogramsintherexpoweredwalkingaid
AT signalnada resultsofthefirstinterimanalysisoftherapperiitrialinpatientswithspinalcordinjuryambulationandfunctionalexerciseprogramsintherexpoweredwalkingaid