Cargando…
Laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese gastric cancer patients: a comparative study with non-obese patients and evaluation of difference in laparoscopic methods
BACKGROUND: Obesity is a growing epidemic around the world, and obese patients are generally regarded as high risk for surgery compared with normal weight patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of obesity on the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5477413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28629379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0638-1 |
_version_ | 1783244788283211776 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Ke Pan, Yu Zhai, Shu-ting Cai, Jia-qin Chen, Qi-long Chen, Ding-wei Zhu, Yi-ping Zhang, Yu Zhang, Ya-ping Maher, Hendi Wang, Xian-fa |
author_facet | Chen, Ke Pan, Yu Zhai, Shu-ting Cai, Jia-qin Chen, Qi-long Chen, Ding-wei Zhu, Yi-ping Zhang, Yu Zhang, Ya-ping Maher, Hendi Wang, Xian-fa |
author_sort | Chen, Ke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Obesity is a growing epidemic around the world, and obese patients are generally regarded as high risk for surgery compared with normal weight patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of obesity on the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer. METHODS: We reviewed data for all patients undergoing LG for gastric cancer at our institute between October 2004 and December 2016. Patients were divided into non-obese and obese groups and the perioperative outcomes were compared. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate which of the two commonly used methods of LG, laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) and totally laparoscopic gastrectomy (TLG), is more suitable for obese patients. RESULTS: A total of 1691 patients, 1255 non-obese and 436 obese or overweight patients, underwent LG during the study period. The mean operation time was significantly longer in the obese group than in the non-obese group (209.9 ± 29.7 vs. 227.2 ± 25.7 min, P < 0.01), and intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the non-obese group (113.4 ± 34.1 vs. 136.9 ± 36.7 ml, P < 0.01). Time to first flatus, time to oral intake, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the non-obese group than in the obese group (3.3 ± 0.8 vs. 3.6 ± 0.9 days; 4.3 ± 1.0 vs. 4.6 ± 1.0 days; and 9.0 ± 2.2 vs. 9.6 ± 2.2 days, respectively; P < 0.01). 119 (9.5%) of the non-obese patients had postoperative complications as compared to 44 (10.1%) of the obese patients (P = 0.71). In the subgroup analysis of all patients, TLG showed improved results for early surgical outcomes compared to LAG, mainly due to its advantages in obese patients. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is associated with long operation time, increased blood loss, and slow recovery after laparoscopic gastric resection but does not affect intraoperative security or effectiveness. TLG may have less negative results in obese patients than LAG due to a variety of reasons. Our analysis shows that TLG is more advantageous, with regard to early surgical outcomes, for obese patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5477413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54774132017-06-23 Laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese gastric cancer patients: a comparative study with non-obese patients and evaluation of difference in laparoscopic methods Chen, Ke Pan, Yu Zhai, Shu-ting Cai, Jia-qin Chen, Qi-long Chen, Ding-wei Zhu, Yi-ping Zhang, Yu Zhang, Ya-ping Maher, Hendi Wang, Xian-fa BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Obesity is a growing epidemic around the world, and obese patients are generally regarded as high risk for surgery compared with normal weight patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of obesity on the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer. METHODS: We reviewed data for all patients undergoing LG for gastric cancer at our institute between October 2004 and December 2016. Patients were divided into non-obese and obese groups and the perioperative outcomes were compared. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate which of the two commonly used methods of LG, laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) and totally laparoscopic gastrectomy (TLG), is more suitable for obese patients. RESULTS: A total of 1691 patients, 1255 non-obese and 436 obese or overweight patients, underwent LG during the study period. The mean operation time was significantly longer in the obese group than in the non-obese group (209.9 ± 29.7 vs. 227.2 ± 25.7 min, P < 0.01), and intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the non-obese group (113.4 ± 34.1 vs. 136.9 ± 36.7 ml, P < 0.01). Time to first flatus, time to oral intake, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the non-obese group than in the obese group (3.3 ± 0.8 vs. 3.6 ± 0.9 days; 4.3 ± 1.0 vs. 4.6 ± 1.0 days; and 9.0 ± 2.2 vs. 9.6 ± 2.2 days, respectively; P < 0.01). 119 (9.5%) of the non-obese patients had postoperative complications as compared to 44 (10.1%) of the obese patients (P = 0.71). In the subgroup analysis of all patients, TLG showed improved results for early surgical outcomes compared to LAG, mainly due to its advantages in obese patients. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is associated with long operation time, increased blood loss, and slow recovery after laparoscopic gastric resection but does not affect intraoperative security or effectiveness. TLG may have less negative results in obese patients than LAG due to a variety of reasons. Our analysis shows that TLG is more advantageous, with regard to early surgical outcomes, for obese patients. BioMed Central 2017-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5477413/ /pubmed/28629379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0638-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chen, Ke Pan, Yu Zhai, Shu-ting Cai, Jia-qin Chen, Qi-long Chen, Ding-wei Zhu, Yi-ping Zhang, Yu Zhang, Ya-ping Maher, Hendi Wang, Xian-fa Laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese gastric cancer patients: a comparative study with non-obese patients and evaluation of difference in laparoscopic methods |
title | Laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese gastric cancer patients: a comparative study with non-obese patients and evaluation of difference in laparoscopic methods |
title_full | Laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese gastric cancer patients: a comparative study with non-obese patients and evaluation of difference in laparoscopic methods |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese gastric cancer patients: a comparative study with non-obese patients and evaluation of difference in laparoscopic methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese gastric cancer patients: a comparative study with non-obese patients and evaluation of difference in laparoscopic methods |
title_short | Laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese gastric cancer patients: a comparative study with non-obese patients and evaluation of difference in laparoscopic methods |
title_sort | laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese gastric cancer patients: a comparative study with non-obese patients and evaluation of difference in laparoscopic methods |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5477413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28629379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0638-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenke laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods AT panyu laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods AT zhaishuting laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods AT caijiaqin laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods AT chenqilong laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods AT chendingwei laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods AT zhuyiping laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods AT zhangyu laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods AT zhangyaping laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods AT maherhendi laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods AT wangxianfa laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods |