Cargando…

Laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese gastric cancer patients: a comparative study with non-obese patients and evaluation of difference in laparoscopic methods

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a growing epidemic around the world, and obese patients are generally regarded as high risk for surgery compared with normal weight patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of obesity on the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Ke, Pan, Yu, Zhai, Shu-ting, Cai, Jia-qin, Chen, Qi-long, Chen, Ding-wei, Zhu, Yi-ping, Zhang, Yu, Zhang, Ya-ping, Maher, Hendi, Wang, Xian-fa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5477413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28629379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0638-1
_version_ 1783244788283211776
author Chen, Ke
Pan, Yu
Zhai, Shu-ting
Cai, Jia-qin
Chen, Qi-long
Chen, Ding-wei
Zhu, Yi-ping
Zhang, Yu
Zhang, Ya-ping
Maher, Hendi
Wang, Xian-fa
author_facet Chen, Ke
Pan, Yu
Zhai, Shu-ting
Cai, Jia-qin
Chen, Qi-long
Chen, Ding-wei
Zhu, Yi-ping
Zhang, Yu
Zhang, Ya-ping
Maher, Hendi
Wang, Xian-fa
author_sort Chen, Ke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Obesity is a growing epidemic around the world, and obese patients are generally regarded as high risk for surgery compared with normal weight patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of obesity on the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer. METHODS: We reviewed data for all patients undergoing LG for gastric cancer at our institute between October 2004 and December 2016. Patients were divided into non-obese and obese groups and the perioperative outcomes were compared. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate which of the two commonly used methods of LG, laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) and totally laparoscopic gastrectomy (TLG), is more suitable for obese patients. RESULTS: A total of 1691 patients, 1255 non-obese and 436 obese or overweight patients, underwent LG during the study period. The mean operation time was significantly longer in the obese group than in the non-obese group (209.9 ± 29.7 vs. 227.2 ± 25.7 min, P < 0.01), and intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the non-obese group (113.4 ± 34.1 vs. 136.9 ± 36.7 ml, P < 0.01). Time to first flatus, time to oral intake, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the non-obese group than in the obese group (3.3 ± 0.8 vs. 3.6 ± 0.9 days; 4.3 ± 1.0 vs. 4.6 ± 1.0 days; and 9.0 ± 2.2 vs. 9.6 ± 2.2 days, respectively; P < 0.01). 119 (9.5%) of the non-obese patients had postoperative complications as compared to 44 (10.1%) of the obese patients (P = 0.71). In the subgroup analysis of all patients, TLG showed improved results for early surgical outcomes compared to LAG, mainly due to its advantages in obese patients. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is associated with long operation time, increased blood loss, and slow recovery after laparoscopic gastric resection but does not affect intraoperative security or effectiveness. TLG may have less negative results in obese patients than LAG due to a variety of reasons. Our analysis shows that TLG is more advantageous, with regard to early surgical outcomes, for obese patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5477413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54774132017-06-23 Laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese gastric cancer patients: a comparative study with non-obese patients and evaluation of difference in laparoscopic methods Chen, Ke Pan, Yu Zhai, Shu-ting Cai, Jia-qin Chen, Qi-long Chen, Ding-wei Zhu, Yi-ping Zhang, Yu Zhang, Ya-ping Maher, Hendi Wang, Xian-fa BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Obesity is a growing epidemic around the world, and obese patients are generally regarded as high risk for surgery compared with normal weight patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of obesity on the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer. METHODS: We reviewed data for all patients undergoing LG for gastric cancer at our institute between October 2004 and December 2016. Patients were divided into non-obese and obese groups and the perioperative outcomes were compared. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate which of the two commonly used methods of LG, laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) and totally laparoscopic gastrectomy (TLG), is more suitable for obese patients. RESULTS: A total of 1691 patients, 1255 non-obese and 436 obese or overweight patients, underwent LG during the study period. The mean operation time was significantly longer in the obese group than in the non-obese group (209.9 ± 29.7 vs. 227.2 ± 25.7 min, P < 0.01), and intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the non-obese group (113.4 ± 34.1 vs. 136.9 ± 36.7 ml, P < 0.01). Time to first flatus, time to oral intake, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the non-obese group than in the obese group (3.3 ± 0.8 vs. 3.6 ± 0.9 days; 4.3 ± 1.0 vs. 4.6 ± 1.0 days; and 9.0 ± 2.2 vs. 9.6 ± 2.2 days, respectively; P < 0.01). 119 (9.5%) of the non-obese patients had postoperative complications as compared to 44 (10.1%) of the obese patients (P = 0.71). In the subgroup analysis of all patients, TLG showed improved results for early surgical outcomes compared to LAG, mainly due to its advantages in obese patients. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is associated with long operation time, increased blood loss, and slow recovery after laparoscopic gastric resection but does not affect intraoperative security or effectiveness. TLG may have less negative results in obese patients than LAG due to a variety of reasons. Our analysis shows that TLG is more advantageous, with regard to early surgical outcomes, for obese patients. BioMed Central 2017-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5477413/ /pubmed/28629379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0638-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Ke
Pan, Yu
Zhai, Shu-ting
Cai, Jia-qin
Chen, Qi-long
Chen, Ding-wei
Zhu, Yi-ping
Zhang, Yu
Zhang, Ya-ping
Maher, Hendi
Wang, Xian-fa
Laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese gastric cancer patients: a comparative study with non-obese patients and evaluation of difference in laparoscopic methods
title Laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese gastric cancer patients: a comparative study with non-obese patients and evaluation of difference in laparoscopic methods
title_full Laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese gastric cancer patients: a comparative study with non-obese patients and evaluation of difference in laparoscopic methods
title_fullStr Laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese gastric cancer patients: a comparative study with non-obese patients and evaluation of difference in laparoscopic methods
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese gastric cancer patients: a comparative study with non-obese patients and evaluation of difference in laparoscopic methods
title_short Laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese gastric cancer patients: a comparative study with non-obese patients and evaluation of difference in laparoscopic methods
title_sort laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese gastric cancer patients: a comparative study with non-obese patients and evaluation of difference in laparoscopic methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5477413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28629379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0638-1
work_keys_str_mv AT chenke laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods
AT panyu laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods
AT zhaishuting laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods
AT caijiaqin laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods
AT chenqilong laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods
AT chendingwei laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods
AT zhuyiping laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods
AT zhangyu laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods
AT zhangyaping laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods
AT maherhendi laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods
AT wangxianfa laparoscopicgastrectomyinobesegastriccancerpatientsacomparativestudywithnonobesepatientsandevaluationofdifferenceinlaparoscopicmethods