Cargando…

ECMO in major burn patients: feasibility and considerations when multiple modes of mechanical ventilation fail

BACKGROUND: We report two cases of acute respiratory distress syndrome in burn patients who were successfully managed with good outcomes with extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) after failing multiple conventional modes of ventilation, and review the relevant literature. CASE PRESENTATION: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kennedy, Jason D., Thayer, Wesley, Beuno, Reuben, Kohorst, Kelly, Kumar, Avinash B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5477428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28649575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41038-017-0085-9
_version_ 1783244790323740672
author Kennedy, Jason D.
Thayer, Wesley
Beuno, Reuben
Kohorst, Kelly
Kumar, Avinash B.
author_facet Kennedy, Jason D.
Thayer, Wesley
Beuno, Reuben
Kohorst, Kelly
Kumar, Avinash B.
author_sort Kennedy, Jason D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We report two cases of acute respiratory distress syndrome in burn patients who were successfully managed with good outcomes with extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) after failing multiple conventional modes of ventilation, and review the relevant literature. CASE PRESENTATION: The two patients were a 39-year-old male and 53-year-old male with modified Baux Scores of 79 and 78, respectively, with no known inhalation injury. After the initial modified Parkland-based fluid resuscitation and partial escharotomy, both patients developed worsening hypoxemia and acute respiratory distress syndrome. The hypoxemia continued to worsen on multiple modes of ventilation including volume control, pressure regulated volume control, pressure control, airway pressure release ventilation and volumetric diffusive ventilation. In both cases, the PaO(2) ≤ 50 mm Hg on a FiO(2) 100% during the trial of mechanical ventilation. The deterioration was rapid (<12 h since onset of worsening oxygenation) in both cases. A decision was made to trial the patients on ECMO. Veno-Venous ECMO (V-V ECMO) was successfully initiated following cannulation-under transesophgeal echo guidance—with the dual lumen Avalon® (Maquet, NJ, USA) cannula. ECMO support was maintained for 4 and 24 days, respectively. Both patients were successfully weaned off ECMO and were discharged to rehabilitation following their complex hospital course. CONCLUSION: Early ECMO for isolated respiratory failure in the setting on maintained hemodynamics resulted in a positive outcome in our two burn patients suffered from acute respiratory distress syndrome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5477428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54774282017-06-23 ECMO in major burn patients: feasibility and considerations when multiple modes of mechanical ventilation fail Kennedy, Jason D. Thayer, Wesley Beuno, Reuben Kohorst, Kelly Kumar, Avinash B. Burns Trauma Case Report BACKGROUND: We report two cases of acute respiratory distress syndrome in burn patients who were successfully managed with good outcomes with extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) after failing multiple conventional modes of ventilation, and review the relevant literature. CASE PRESENTATION: The two patients were a 39-year-old male and 53-year-old male with modified Baux Scores of 79 and 78, respectively, with no known inhalation injury. After the initial modified Parkland-based fluid resuscitation and partial escharotomy, both patients developed worsening hypoxemia and acute respiratory distress syndrome. The hypoxemia continued to worsen on multiple modes of ventilation including volume control, pressure regulated volume control, pressure control, airway pressure release ventilation and volumetric diffusive ventilation. In both cases, the PaO(2) ≤ 50 mm Hg on a FiO(2) 100% during the trial of mechanical ventilation. The deterioration was rapid (<12 h since onset of worsening oxygenation) in both cases. A decision was made to trial the patients on ECMO. Veno-Venous ECMO (V-V ECMO) was successfully initiated following cannulation-under transesophgeal echo guidance—with the dual lumen Avalon® (Maquet, NJ, USA) cannula. ECMO support was maintained for 4 and 24 days, respectively. Both patients were successfully weaned off ECMO and were discharged to rehabilitation following their complex hospital course. CONCLUSION: Early ECMO for isolated respiratory failure in the setting on maintained hemodynamics resulted in a positive outcome in our two burn patients suffered from acute respiratory distress syndrome. BioMed Central 2017-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5477428/ /pubmed/28649575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41038-017-0085-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Kennedy, Jason D.
Thayer, Wesley
Beuno, Reuben
Kohorst, Kelly
Kumar, Avinash B.
ECMO in major burn patients: feasibility and considerations when multiple modes of mechanical ventilation fail
title ECMO in major burn patients: feasibility and considerations when multiple modes of mechanical ventilation fail
title_full ECMO in major burn patients: feasibility and considerations when multiple modes of mechanical ventilation fail
title_fullStr ECMO in major burn patients: feasibility and considerations when multiple modes of mechanical ventilation fail
title_full_unstemmed ECMO in major burn patients: feasibility and considerations when multiple modes of mechanical ventilation fail
title_short ECMO in major burn patients: feasibility and considerations when multiple modes of mechanical ventilation fail
title_sort ecmo in major burn patients: feasibility and considerations when multiple modes of mechanical ventilation fail
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5477428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28649575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41038-017-0085-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kennedyjasond ecmoinmajorburnpatientsfeasibilityandconsiderationswhenmultiplemodesofmechanicalventilationfail
AT thayerwesley ecmoinmajorburnpatientsfeasibilityandconsiderationswhenmultiplemodesofmechanicalventilationfail
AT beunoreuben ecmoinmajorburnpatientsfeasibilityandconsiderationswhenmultiplemodesofmechanicalventilationfail
AT kohorstkelly ecmoinmajorburnpatientsfeasibilityandconsiderationswhenmultiplemodesofmechanicalventilationfail
AT kumaravinashb ecmoinmajorburnpatientsfeasibilityandconsiderationswhenmultiplemodesofmechanicalventilationfail