Cargando…

A concise revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index as a valid prognostic instrument in a large cohort of 801 multiple myeloma patients

With growing numbers of elderly multiple myeloma patients, reliable tools to assess their vulnerability are required. The objective of the analysis herein was to develop and validate an easy to use myeloma risk score (revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index) that allows for risk prediction of overall surv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Engelhardt, Monika, Domm, Anne-Saskia, Dold, Sandra Maria, Ihorst, Gabriele, Reinhardt, Heike, Zober, Alexander, Hieke, Stefanie, Baayen, Corine, Müller, Stefan Jürgen, Einsele, Hermann, Sonneveld, Pieter, Landgren, Ola, Schumacher, Martin, Wäsch, Ralph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ferrata Storti Foundation 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5477610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28154088
http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2016.162693
_version_ 1783244825287458816
author Engelhardt, Monika
Domm, Anne-Saskia
Dold, Sandra Maria
Ihorst, Gabriele
Reinhardt, Heike
Zober, Alexander
Hieke, Stefanie
Baayen, Corine
Müller, Stefan Jürgen
Einsele, Hermann
Sonneveld, Pieter
Landgren, Ola
Schumacher, Martin
Wäsch, Ralph
author_facet Engelhardt, Monika
Domm, Anne-Saskia
Dold, Sandra Maria
Ihorst, Gabriele
Reinhardt, Heike
Zober, Alexander
Hieke, Stefanie
Baayen, Corine
Müller, Stefan Jürgen
Einsele, Hermann
Sonneveld, Pieter
Landgren, Ola
Schumacher, Martin
Wäsch, Ralph
author_sort Engelhardt, Monika
collection PubMed
description With growing numbers of elderly multiple myeloma patients, reliable tools to assess their vulnerability are required. The objective of the analysis herein was to develop and validate an easy to use myeloma risk score (revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index) that allows for risk prediction of overall survival and progression-free survival differences in a large patient cohort. We conducted a comprehensive comorbidity, frailty and disability evaluation in 801 consecutive myeloma patients, including comorbidity risks obtained at diagnosis. The cohort was examined within a training and validation set. Multivariate analysis determined renal, lung and Karnofsky Performance Status impairment, frailty and age as significant risks for overall survival. These were combined in a weighted revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index, allowing for the identification of fit (revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index ≤3 [n=247, 30.8%]), intermediate-fit (revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index 4–6 [n=446, 55.7%]) and frail patients (revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index >6 [n=108, 13.5%]): these subgroups, confirmed via validation analysis, showed median overall survival rates of 10.1, 4.4 and 1.2 years, respectively. The revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index was compared to other commonly used comorbidity indices (Charlson Comorbidity Index, Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Specific Comorbidity Index, Kaplan-Feinstein Index): if each were divided in risk groups based on 25% and 75% quartiles, highest hazard ratios, best prediction and Brier scores were achieved with the revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index. The advantages of the revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index include its accurate assessment of patients’ physical conditions and simple clinical applicability. We propose the revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index to be tested with the “reference” International Myeloma Working Group frailty score in multicenter analyses and future clinical trials. The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-00003868).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5477610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Ferrata Storti Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54776102017-06-28 A concise revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index as a valid prognostic instrument in a large cohort of 801 multiple myeloma patients Engelhardt, Monika Domm, Anne-Saskia Dold, Sandra Maria Ihorst, Gabriele Reinhardt, Heike Zober, Alexander Hieke, Stefanie Baayen, Corine Müller, Stefan Jürgen Einsele, Hermann Sonneveld, Pieter Landgren, Ola Schumacher, Martin Wäsch, Ralph Haematologica Articles With growing numbers of elderly multiple myeloma patients, reliable tools to assess their vulnerability are required. The objective of the analysis herein was to develop and validate an easy to use myeloma risk score (revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index) that allows for risk prediction of overall survival and progression-free survival differences in a large patient cohort. We conducted a comprehensive comorbidity, frailty and disability evaluation in 801 consecutive myeloma patients, including comorbidity risks obtained at diagnosis. The cohort was examined within a training and validation set. Multivariate analysis determined renal, lung and Karnofsky Performance Status impairment, frailty and age as significant risks for overall survival. These were combined in a weighted revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index, allowing for the identification of fit (revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index ≤3 [n=247, 30.8%]), intermediate-fit (revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index 4–6 [n=446, 55.7%]) and frail patients (revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index >6 [n=108, 13.5%]): these subgroups, confirmed via validation analysis, showed median overall survival rates of 10.1, 4.4 and 1.2 years, respectively. The revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index was compared to other commonly used comorbidity indices (Charlson Comorbidity Index, Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Specific Comorbidity Index, Kaplan-Feinstein Index): if each were divided in risk groups based on 25% and 75% quartiles, highest hazard ratios, best prediction and Brier scores were achieved with the revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index. The advantages of the revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index include its accurate assessment of patients’ physical conditions and simple clinical applicability. We propose the revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index to be tested with the “reference” International Myeloma Working Group frailty score in multicenter analyses and future clinical trials. The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-00003868). Ferrata Storti Foundation 2017-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5477610/ /pubmed/28154088 http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2016.162693 Text en Copyright© Ferrata Storti Foundation Material published in Haematologica is covered by copyright. All rights are reserved to the Ferrata Storti Foundation. Use of published material is allowed under the following terms and conditions: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode. Copies of published material are allowed for personal or internal use. Sharing published material for non-commercial purposes is subject to the following conditions: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode, sect. 3. Reproducing and sharing published material for commercial purposes is not allowed without permission in writing from the publisher.
spellingShingle Articles
Engelhardt, Monika
Domm, Anne-Saskia
Dold, Sandra Maria
Ihorst, Gabriele
Reinhardt, Heike
Zober, Alexander
Hieke, Stefanie
Baayen, Corine
Müller, Stefan Jürgen
Einsele, Hermann
Sonneveld, Pieter
Landgren, Ola
Schumacher, Martin
Wäsch, Ralph
A concise revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index as a valid prognostic instrument in a large cohort of 801 multiple myeloma patients
title A concise revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index as a valid prognostic instrument in a large cohort of 801 multiple myeloma patients
title_full A concise revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index as a valid prognostic instrument in a large cohort of 801 multiple myeloma patients
title_fullStr A concise revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index as a valid prognostic instrument in a large cohort of 801 multiple myeloma patients
title_full_unstemmed A concise revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index as a valid prognostic instrument in a large cohort of 801 multiple myeloma patients
title_short A concise revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index as a valid prognostic instrument in a large cohort of 801 multiple myeloma patients
title_sort concise revised myeloma comorbidity index as a valid prognostic instrument in a large cohort of 801 multiple myeloma patients
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5477610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28154088
http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2016.162693
work_keys_str_mv AT engelhardtmonika aconciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT dommannesaskia aconciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT doldsandramaria aconciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT ihorstgabriele aconciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT reinhardtheike aconciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT zoberalexander aconciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT hiekestefanie aconciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT baayencorine aconciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT mullerstefanjurgen aconciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT einselehermann aconciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT sonneveldpieter aconciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT landgrenola aconciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT schumachermartin aconciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT waschralph aconciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT engelhardtmonika conciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT dommannesaskia conciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT doldsandramaria conciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT ihorstgabriele conciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT reinhardtheike conciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT zoberalexander conciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT hiekestefanie conciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT baayencorine conciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT mullerstefanjurgen conciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT einselehermann conciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT sonneveldpieter conciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT landgrenola conciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT schumachermartin conciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients
AT waschralph conciserevisedmyelomacomorbidityindexasavalidprognosticinstrumentinalargecohortof801multiplemyelomapatients