Cargando…

Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology–American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the optimal negative margin width for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated with breast-conserving surgery and whole-breast irradiation (WBRT). METHODS: A multidisciplinary consensus panel used a meta-analysis of margin width and ipsilateral breast tumor re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morrow, Monica, Van Zee, Kimberly J., Solin, Lawrence J., Houssami, Nehmat, Chavez-MacGregor, Mariana, Harris, Jay R., Horton, Janet, Hwang, Shelley, Johnson, Peggy L., Marinovich, M. Luke, Schnitt, Stuart J., Wapnir, Irene, Moran, Meena S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5477830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27528719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.68.3573
_version_ 1783244853186920448
author Morrow, Monica
Van Zee, Kimberly J.
Solin, Lawrence J.
Houssami, Nehmat
Chavez-MacGregor, Mariana
Harris, Jay R.
Horton, Janet
Hwang, Shelley
Johnson, Peggy L.
Marinovich, M. Luke
Schnitt, Stuart J.
Wapnir, Irene
Moran, Meena S.
author_facet Morrow, Monica
Van Zee, Kimberly J.
Solin, Lawrence J.
Houssami, Nehmat
Chavez-MacGregor, Mariana
Harris, Jay R.
Horton, Janet
Hwang, Shelley
Johnson, Peggy L.
Marinovich, M. Luke
Schnitt, Stuart J.
Wapnir, Irene
Moran, Meena S.
author_sort Morrow, Monica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the optimal negative margin width for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated with breast-conserving surgery and whole-breast irradiation (WBRT). METHODS: A multidisciplinary consensus panel used a meta-analysis of margin width and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) from a systematic review of 20 studies including 7883 patients and other published literature as the evidence base for consensus. RESULTS: Negative margins halve the risk of IBTR compared with positive margins defined as ink on DCIS. A 2 mm margin minimizes the risk of IBTR compared with smaller negative margins. More widely clear margins do not significantly decrease IBTR compared with 2 mm margins. Negative margins less than 2 mm alone are not an indication for mastectomy, and factors known to impact rates of IBTR should be considered in determining the need for re-excision. CONCLUSION: The use of a 2 mm margin as the standard for an adequate margin in DCIS treated with WBRT is associated with low rates of IBTR and has the potential to decrease re-excision rates, improve cosmetic outcome, and decrease health care costs. Clinical judgment should be used in determining the need for further surgery in patients with negative margins < 2 mm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5477830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54778302017-06-29 Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology–American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Morrow, Monica Van Zee, Kimberly J. Solin, Lawrence J. Houssami, Nehmat Chavez-MacGregor, Mariana Harris, Jay R. Horton, Janet Hwang, Shelley Johnson, Peggy L. Marinovich, M. Luke Schnitt, Stuart J. Wapnir, Irene Moran, Meena S. J Clin Oncol ASCO Special Article BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the optimal negative margin width for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated with breast-conserving surgery and whole-breast irradiation (WBRT). METHODS: A multidisciplinary consensus panel used a meta-analysis of margin width and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) from a systematic review of 20 studies including 7883 patients and other published literature as the evidence base for consensus. RESULTS: Negative margins halve the risk of IBTR compared with positive margins defined as ink on DCIS. A 2 mm margin minimizes the risk of IBTR compared with smaller negative margins. More widely clear margins do not significantly decrease IBTR compared with 2 mm margins. Negative margins less than 2 mm alone are not an indication for mastectomy, and factors known to impact rates of IBTR should be considered in determining the need for re-excision. CONCLUSION: The use of a 2 mm margin as the standard for an adequate margin in DCIS treated with WBRT is associated with low rates of IBTR and has the potential to decrease re-excision rates, improve cosmetic outcome, and decrease health care costs. Clinical judgment should be used in determining the need for further surgery in patients with negative margins < 2 mm. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2016-11-20 2016-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5477830/ /pubmed/27528719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.68.3573 Text en © 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Society of Surgical Oncology, and American Society for Radiation Oncology Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle ASCO Special Article
Morrow, Monica
Van Zee, Kimberly J.
Solin, Lawrence J.
Houssami, Nehmat
Chavez-MacGregor, Mariana
Harris, Jay R.
Horton, Janet
Hwang, Shelley
Johnson, Peggy L.
Marinovich, M. Luke
Schnitt, Stuart J.
Wapnir, Irene
Moran, Meena S.
Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology–American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
title Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology–American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
title_full Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology–American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
title_fullStr Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology–American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
title_full_unstemmed Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology–American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
title_short Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology–American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
title_sort society of surgical oncology–american society for radiation oncology–american society of clinical oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ
topic ASCO Special Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5477830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27528719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.68.3573
work_keys_str_mv AT morrowmonica societyofsurgicaloncologyamericansocietyforradiationoncologyamericansocietyofclinicaloncologyconsensusguidelineonmarginsforbreastconservingsurgerywithwholebreastirradiationinductalcarcinomainsitu
AT vanzeekimberlyj societyofsurgicaloncologyamericansocietyforradiationoncologyamericansocietyofclinicaloncologyconsensusguidelineonmarginsforbreastconservingsurgerywithwholebreastirradiationinductalcarcinomainsitu
AT solinlawrencej societyofsurgicaloncologyamericansocietyforradiationoncologyamericansocietyofclinicaloncologyconsensusguidelineonmarginsforbreastconservingsurgerywithwholebreastirradiationinductalcarcinomainsitu
AT houssaminehmat societyofsurgicaloncologyamericansocietyforradiationoncologyamericansocietyofclinicaloncologyconsensusguidelineonmarginsforbreastconservingsurgerywithwholebreastirradiationinductalcarcinomainsitu
AT chavezmacgregormariana societyofsurgicaloncologyamericansocietyforradiationoncologyamericansocietyofclinicaloncologyconsensusguidelineonmarginsforbreastconservingsurgerywithwholebreastirradiationinductalcarcinomainsitu
AT harrisjayr societyofsurgicaloncologyamericansocietyforradiationoncologyamericansocietyofclinicaloncologyconsensusguidelineonmarginsforbreastconservingsurgerywithwholebreastirradiationinductalcarcinomainsitu
AT hortonjanet societyofsurgicaloncologyamericansocietyforradiationoncologyamericansocietyofclinicaloncologyconsensusguidelineonmarginsforbreastconservingsurgerywithwholebreastirradiationinductalcarcinomainsitu
AT hwangshelley societyofsurgicaloncologyamericansocietyforradiationoncologyamericansocietyofclinicaloncologyconsensusguidelineonmarginsforbreastconservingsurgerywithwholebreastirradiationinductalcarcinomainsitu
AT johnsonpeggyl societyofsurgicaloncologyamericansocietyforradiationoncologyamericansocietyofclinicaloncologyconsensusguidelineonmarginsforbreastconservingsurgerywithwholebreastirradiationinductalcarcinomainsitu
AT marinovichmluke societyofsurgicaloncologyamericansocietyforradiationoncologyamericansocietyofclinicaloncologyconsensusguidelineonmarginsforbreastconservingsurgerywithwholebreastirradiationinductalcarcinomainsitu
AT schnittstuartj societyofsurgicaloncologyamericansocietyforradiationoncologyamericansocietyofclinicaloncologyconsensusguidelineonmarginsforbreastconservingsurgerywithwholebreastirradiationinductalcarcinomainsitu
AT wapnirirene societyofsurgicaloncologyamericansocietyforradiationoncologyamericansocietyofclinicaloncologyconsensusguidelineonmarginsforbreastconservingsurgerywithwholebreastirradiationinductalcarcinomainsitu
AT moranmeenas societyofsurgicaloncologyamericansocietyforradiationoncologyamericansocietyofclinicaloncologyconsensusguidelineonmarginsforbreastconservingsurgerywithwholebreastirradiationinductalcarcinomainsitu