Cargando…
Extremely low-frame-rate digital fluoroscopy in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A comparison of 2 versus 4 frame rate
Despite the technological advance in 3-dimensional (3D) mapping, radiation exposure during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) continues to be a major concern in both patients and physicians. Previous studies reported substantial radiation exposure (7369–8690 cGy cm(2)) during AF catheter...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5478349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28614264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007200 |
_version_ | 1783244947633209344 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Ji Hyun Kim, Jun Kim, Minsu Hwang, Jongmin Hwang, You Mi Kang, Joon-Won Nam, Gi-Byoung Choi, Kee-Joon Kim, You-Ho |
author_facet | Lee, Ji Hyun Kim, Jun Kim, Minsu Hwang, Jongmin Hwang, You Mi Kang, Joon-Won Nam, Gi-Byoung Choi, Kee-Joon Kim, You-Ho |
author_sort | Lee, Ji Hyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite the technological advance in 3-dimensional (3D) mapping, radiation exposure during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) continues to be a major concern in both patients and physicians. Previous studies reported substantial radiation exposure (7369–8690 cGy cm(2)) during AF catheter ablation with fluoroscopic settings of 7.5 frames per second (FPS) under 3D mapping system guidance. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a low-frame-rate fluoroscopy protocol for catheter ablation for AF. Retrospective analysis of data on 133 patients who underwent AF catheter ablation with 3-D electro-anatomic mapping at our institute from January 2014 to May 2015 was performed. Since January 2014, fluoroscopy frame rate of 4-FPS was implemented at our institute, which was further decreased to 2-FPS in September 2014. We compared the radiation exposure quantified as dose area product (DAP) and effective dose (ED) between the 4-FPS (n = 57) and 2-FPS (n = 76) groups. The 4-FPS group showed higher median DAP (599.9 cGy cm(2); interquartile range [IR], 371.4–1337.5 cGy cm(2) vs. 392.0 cGy cm(2); IR, 289.7–591.4 cGy cm(2); P < .01), longer median fluoroscopic time (24.4 min; IR, 17.5–34.9 min vs. 15.1 min; IR, 10.7–20.1 min; P < .01), and higher median ED (1.1 mSv; IR, 0.7–2.5 mSv vs. 0.7 mSv; IR, 0.6–1.1 mSv; P < .01) compared with the 2-FPS group. No major procedure-related complications such as cardiac tamponade were observed in either group. Over follow-up durations of 331 ± 197 days, atrial tachyarrhythmia recurred in 20 patients (35.1%) in the 4-FPS group and in 27 patients (35.5%) in the 2-FPS group (P = .96). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed no significant different between the 2 groups (log rank, P = .25). In conclusion, both the 4-FPS and 2-FPS settings were feasible and emitted a relatively low level of radiation compared with that historically reported for DAP in a conventional fluoroscopy setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5478349 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54783492017-06-26 Extremely low-frame-rate digital fluoroscopy in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A comparison of 2 versus 4 frame rate Lee, Ji Hyun Kim, Jun Kim, Minsu Hwang, Jongmin Hwang, You Mi Kang, Joon-Won Nam, Gi-Byoung Choi, Kee-Joon Kim, You-Ho Medicine (Baltimore) 3400 Despite the technological advance in 3-dimensional (3D) mapping, radiation exposure during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) continues to be a major concern in both patients and physicians. Previous studies reported substantial radiation exposure (7369–8690 cGy cm(2)) during AF catheter ablation with fluoroscopic settings of 7.5 frames per second (FPS) under 3D mapping system guidance. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a low-frame-rate fluoroscopy protocol for catheter ablation for AF. Retrospective analysis of data on 133 patients who underwent AF catheter ablation with 3-D electro-anatomic mapping at our institute from January 2014 to May 2015 was performed. Since January 2014, fluoroscopy frame rate of 4-FPS was implemented at our institute, which was further decreased to 2-FPS in September 2014. We compared the radiation exposure quantified as dose area product (DAP) and effective dose (ED) between the 4-FPS (n = 57) and 2-FPS (n = 76) groups. The 4-FPS group showed higher median DAP (599.9 cGy cm(2); interquartile range [IR], 371.4–1337.5 cGy cm(2) vs. 392.0 cGy cm(2); IR, 289.7–591.4 cGy cm(2); P < .01), longer median fluoroscopic time (24.4 min; IR, 17.5–34.9 min vs. 15.1 min; IR, 10.7–20.1 min; P < .01), and higher median ED (1.1 mSv; IR, 0.7–2.5 mSv vs. 0.7 mSv; IR, 0.6–1.1 mSv; P < .01) compared with the 2-FPS group. No major procedure-related complications such as cardiac tamponade were observed in either group. Over follow-up durations of 331 ± 197 days, atrial tachyarrhythmia recurred in 20 patients (35.1%) in the 4-FPS group and in 27 patients (35.5%) in the 2-FPS group (P = .96). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed no significant different between the 2 groups (log rank, P = .25). In conclusion, both the 4-FPS and 2-FPS settings were feasible and emitted a relatively low level of radiation compared with that historically reported for DAP in a conventional fluoroscopy setting. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5478349/ /pubmed/28614264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007200 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 3400 Lee, Ji Hyun Kim, Jun Kim, Minsu Hwang, Jongmin Hwang, You Mi Kang, Joon-Won Nam, Gi-Byoung Choi, Kee-Joon Kim, You-Ho Extremely low-frame-rate digital fluoroscopy in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A comparison of 2 versus 4 frame rate |
title | Extremely low-frame-rate digital fluoroscopy in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A comparison of 2 versus 4 frame rate |
title_full | Extremely low-frame-rate digital fluoroscopy in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A comparison of 2 versus 4 frame rate |
title_fullStr | Extremely low-frame-rate digital fluoroscopy in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A comparison of 2 versus 4 frame rate |
title_full_unstemmed | Extremely low-frame-rate digital fluoroscopy in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A comparison of 2 versus 4 frame rate |
title_short | Extremely low-frame-rate digital fluoroscopy in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A comparison of 2 versus 4 frame rate |
title_sort | extremely low-frame-rate digital fluoroscopy in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a comparison of 2 versus 4 frame rate |
topic | 3400 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5478349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28614264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007200 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejihyun extremelylowframeratedigitalfluoroscopyincatheterablationofatrialfibrillationacomparisonof2versus4framerate AT kimjun extremelylowframeratedigitalfluoroscopyincatheterablationofatrialfibrillationacomparisonof2versus4framerate AT kimminsu extremelylowframeratedigitalfluoroscopyincatheterablationofatrialfibrillationacomparisonof2versus4framerate AT hwangjongmin extremelylowframeratedigitalfluoroscopyincatheterablationofatrialfibrillationacomparisonof2versus4framerate AT hwangyoumi extremelylowframeratedigitalfluoroscopyincatheterablationofatrialfibrillationacomparisonof2versus4framerate AT kangjoonwon extremelylowframeratedigitalfluoroscopyincatheterablationofatrialfibrillationacomparisonof2versus4framerate AT namgibyoung extremelylowframeratedigitalfluoroscopyincatheterablationofatrialfibrillationacomparisonof2versus4framerate AT choikeejoon extremelylowframeratedigitalfluoroscopyincatheterablationofatrialfibrillationacomparisonof2versus4framerate AT kimyouho extremelylowframeratedigitalfluoroscopyincatheterablationofatrialfibrillationacomparisonof2versus4framerate |