Cargando…

Attitudes Toward the Ethics of Research Using Social Media: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Although primarily used for social networking and often used for social support and dissemination, data on social media platforms are increasingly being used to facilitate research. However, the ethical challenges in conducting social media research remain of great concern. Although much...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Golder, Su, Ahmed, Shahd, Norman, Gill, Booth, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5478799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28588006
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7082
_version_ 1783245026745122816
author Golder, Su
Ahmed, Shahd
Norman, Gill
Booth, Andrew
author_facet Golder, Su
Ahmed, Shahd
Norman, Gill
Booth, Andrew
author_sort Golder, Su
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although primarily used for social networking and often used for social support and dissemination, data on social media platforms are increasingly being used to facilitate research. However, the ethical challenges in conducting social media research remain of great concern. Although much debated in the literature, it is the views of the public that are most pertinent to inform future practice. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to ascertain attitudes on the ethical considerations of using social media as a data source for research as expressed by social media users and researchers. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted, wherein 16 databases and 2 Internet search engines were searched in addition to handsearching, reference checking, citation searching, and contacting authors and experts. Studies that conducted any qualitative methods to collect data on attitudes on the ethical implications of research using social media were included. Quality assessment was conducted using the quality of reporting tool (QuaRT) and findings analyzed using inductive thematic synthesis. RESULTS: In total, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. Attitudes varied from overly positive with people expressing the views about the essential nature of such research for the public good, to very concerned with views that social media research should not happen. Underlying reasons for this variation related to issues such as the purpose and quality of the research, the researcher affiliation, and the potential harms. The methods used to conduct the research were also important. Many respondents were positive about social media research while adding caveats such as the need for informed consent or use restricted to public platforms only. CONCLUSIONS: Many conflicting issues contribute to the complexity of good ethical practice in social media research. However, this should not deter researchers from conducting social media research. Each Internet research project requires an individual assessment of its own ethical issues. Guidelines on ethical conduct should be based on current evidence and standardized to avoid discrepancies between, and duplication across, different institutions, taking into consideration different jurisdictions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5478799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54787992017-06-29 Attitudes Toward the Ethics of Research Using Social Media: A Systematic Review Golder, Su Ahmed, Shahd Norman, Gill Booth, Andrew J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Although primarily used for social networking and often used for social support and dissemination, data on social media platforms are increasingly being used to facilitate research. However, the ethical challenges in conducting social media research remain of great concern. Although much debated in the literature, it is the views of the public that are most pertinent to inform future practice. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to ascertain attitudes on the ethical considerations of using social media as a data source for research as expressed by social media users and researchers. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted, wherein 16 databases and 2 Internet search engines were searched in addition to handsearching, reference checking, citation searching, and contacting authors and experts. Studies that conducted any qualitative methods to collect data on attitudes on the ethical implications of research using social media were included. Quality assessment was conducted using the quality of reporting tool (QuaRT) and findings analyzed using inductive thematic synthesis. RESULTS: In total, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. Attitudes varied from overly positive with people expressing the views about the essential nature of such research for the public good, to very concerned with views that social media research should not happen. Underlying reasons for this variation related to issues such as the purpose and quality of the research, the researcher affiliation, and the potential harms. The methods used to conduct the research were also important. Many respondents were positive about social media research while adding caveats such as the need for informed consent or use restricted to public platforms only. CONCLUSIONS: Many conflicting issues contribute to the complexity of good ethical practice in social media research. However, this should not deter researchers from conducting social media research. Each Internet research project requires an individual assessment of its own ethical issues. Guidelines on ethical conduct should be based on current evidence and standardized to avoid discrepancies between, and duplication across, different institutions, taking into consideration different jurisdictions. JMIR Publications 2017-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5478799/ /pubmed/28588006 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7082 Text en ©Su Golder, Shahd Ahmed, Gill Norman, Andrew Booth. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 06.06.2017. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Golder, Su
Ahmed, Shahd
Norman, Gill
Booth, Andrew
Attitudes Toward the Ethics of Research Using Social Media: A Systematic Review
title Attitudes Toward the Ethics of Research Using Social Media: A Systematic Review
title_full Attitudes Toward the Ethics of Research Using Social Media: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Attitudes Toward the Ethics of Research Using Social Media: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes Toward the Ethics of Research Using Social Media: A Systematic Review
title_short Attitudes Toward the Ethics of Research Using Social Media: A Systematic Review
title_sort attitudes toward the ethics of research using social media: a systematic review
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5478799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28588006
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7082
work_keys_str_mv AT goldersu attitudestowardtheethicsofresearchusingsocialmediaasystematicreview
AT ahmedshahd attitudestowardtheethicsofresearchusingsocialmediaasystematicreview
AT normangill attitudestowardtheethicsofresearchusingsocialmediaasystematicreview
AT boothandrew attitudestowardtheethicsofresearchusingsocialmediaasystematicreview